Adventure Projects is hiring a web engineer to join us in Boulder, CO
Mountain Project Logo

Routes in Poke-O-Moonshine Main Face

7 year itch T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Air Male S 5.11d 7a 24 VIII 25 E5 6a PG13
Ancient of Days T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b PG13
Arch Crack T 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Bastard T 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c R
Bloody Mary T 5.9+ 5c 17 VI 17 E1 5a
Borderline T 5.11 6c+ 23 VIII- 23 E4 5c
Bushido T 5.11c 6c+ 24 VIII- 24 E4 6a PG13
C-Tips S 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Calvary Hill S 5.12b 7b 26 VIII+ 26 E5 6b
Casual Observer T 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c
Certified Raw T 5.10 6b 20 VII- 19 E2 5b
Chik'n Garbonzo T 5.6 4c 14 V 12 S 4b
Cirrhosis T 5.9+ 5c 17 VI 17 E1 5a
Cooney-Norton T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Cosmopolitan Wall T 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b PG13
Earthly Night S 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
FM, The T 5.7+ 5a 15 V+ 13 MVS 4b R
Fastest Gun, The T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Firing Line T 5.11 6c+ 23 VIII- 23 E4 5c PG13
Foreplay T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Freedom Flight T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b PG13
Gamesmanship T 5.8+ 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Grapes of Wrath T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Great Dihedral, The T 5.9+ 5c 17 VI 17 E1 5a PG13
Green Onion T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Group Therapy T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Gun Control Now T 5.11d 7a 24 VIII 25 E5 6a
Hang 'Em High T 5.11c 6c+ 24 VIII- 24 E4 6a
Home Rule S 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
It Don't Come Easy T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b R
Junior Varsity T 5.5 4b 13 IV+ 11 MS 4a
Karmic Kickback T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
La Spirale T 5.11- 6c 22 VIII+ 22 E3 5c PG13
Ladder T 5.7 5a 15 V+ 13 MVS 4b PG13
Lost Chance aka The Natural T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Macho T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c R
Maestro T 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Mayflower T 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Menace To Sobriety S 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Morning Star T 5.10d 6b+ 21 VII+ 21 E3 5b
Munchky Microarete S 5.12a 7a+ 25 VIII+ 25 E5 6a
P.T. Pillar T 5.8+ 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Pandemonium T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Paralysis T 5.8+ 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c PG13
Phase III T 5.9+ 5c 17 VI 17 E1 5a
Pilgrim's Progress T 5.11+ 7a 24 VIII 24 E4 6a
Pillar T 5.7 5a 15 V+ 13 MVS 4b
Psalm 32 T 5.12a/b 7b 26 VIII+ 26 E5 6a A0
Psychosis T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Puppies on Edge T 5.6 4c 14 V 12 S 4b
Ragtime T 5.10+ 6b+ 21 VII+ 20 E3 5b PG13
Raindance T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Raptor's Scream S 5.12c 7b+ 27 IX- 27 E6 6b
Rapture, The T 5.12a 7a+ 25 VIII+ 25 E5 6a
Salad Days S 5.13a 7c+ 29 IX+ 29 E6 6c
Scallion T 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a PG13
Smear Campaign T 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c
Snake Slide T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Snake, The T 5.4 4a 12 IV 10 VD 3c PG13
Snatch, The T 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b PG13
Son of Slime T 5.10- 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a PG13
Son of a Mother T 5.10b/c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Southern Hospitality p1 T 5.11d 7a 24 VIII 25 E5 6a
Static Cling S 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Sting, The T 5.8+ 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Sunburst Arete T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c PG13
Thunderhead T 5.10d 6b+ 21 VII+ 21 E3 5b
Ukiah S 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Varsity T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c R
Order Wrong? Sort Routes
Type: Trad, 500 ft, 4 pitches, Grade III
FA: Geoff Smith and Dick Bushey, 1/77 (p.1 & 2) Jim Dunn, 1978 (p.3 & 4)
Page Views: 19,938 total · 149/month
Shared By: Chris Duca on Nov 10, 2007
Admins: Jim Lawyer

You & This Route

102 Opinions

Your To-Do List:

Add To-Do · View List

Your Star Rating:

     Clear Rating

Your Difficulty Rating:

-none- Change

Your Ticks:

Add New Tick
Access Issue: Peregrine closures and approach trail issues Details


As stated by Don Mellor in his comprehensive guidebook to the adirondacks: "Taken separately, each pitch of this route would be considered among Poke-O's best. Linked together they create an experience that seems to good to be in the East."

The Fastest Gun epitomizes all that climbing at Poke-O is about: In-your-face climbing from top to bottom with dizzying exposure, airy belay stances, and a short, but mandatory runout above small gear. This route is not only a classic Adirondack climb, but a route worthy of coast to coast notoriety.

Pitch 1:
Begin this route at a big right-facing flake with an off-width starting at about 15' off the ground. grunt your way up the layback flake, slam a #4 Camalot in the off-width and figure out how to get yourself to the top of the off-width below the first roof.

place a Camalot under the roof, undercling and jam your way around this strenuous section until some feet can be had off to your right. Take a quick rest, then finish up the jamming/layback section to the slung blocks. Step left and continue over to the left below the double crack system running vertically above you. (100')

Pitch 2:
Follow the seemingly endless twin cracks above you to a small roof. Pull this, then continue above the broken dike, climbing slightly to the left to a ledge. (140')

Pitch 3:
A bolt marks the third pitch. Climb off the ledge to a thin crack on your right. Pass the 1/4 inch bolt at a hard move, then place some small gear, and run it out (5.6ish, but heady) to the large left-facing corner capped by a roof. (160')

Pitch 4:
The roof move. A series of hard moves gets you to the base of the corner. Crank your way up and left over the roof past some loose flakes, and then climb up to the top of the cliff and anchor. (150')

Well done!


About 70 feet to the right of the Bloody Mary corner is a major right-facing flake/crack behind a tree. This is the first pitch.


A full rack with doubles in the mid-size range (green through yellow Camalots), plus a wealth of nuts including a good selection of RPs or brass nuts.
Derek Doucet
Derek Doucet  
P1 can be completely adaquately protected with nothing larger than a #3 camalot. Jun 9, 2010
Jeffrey Gagliano
Pennsburg, PA
Jeffrey Gagliano   Pennsburg, PA
One of the greatest routes you'll ever do. All four pitches are a must do, though the 2nd and fourth are especially memorable. The finger tip traverse under the giant roof on P4 is amazing! Aug 22, 2010
Andrew Mertens
Fort Collins
Andrew Mertens   Fort Collins
I though the spicy bit of pitch 3 was actually getting to the bolt, not the climbing after it. I remember some tricky 5.8-5.9 moves getting to the bolt protected by a small gear, added to the fact that you are right above the belay. The climbing after the crux move is 5.6 at most, and I actually found a fair amount of gear. But awesome route. Every pitch is great but make sure you get the lead on pitch 2 and 4. Oct 13, 2010
afh Horovitz
Portland, OR
afh Horovitz   Portland, OR
You can rappel off this route with one 70M rope. From the top of the last pitch scramble up 30 feet into the woods, go 150 feet climbers left above an obvious tree with rappel tat. Scramble down and 5 or six rappels will bring you to the ground. Aug 9, 2011
Nick W
Orford, NH
Nick W   Orford, NH
Good climb. 3rd pitch heady with questionable gear as I recall, but maybe easier climbing relative to the rest of the route. Nov 11, 2011
did'nt this route used to be 9+, I like that its 10b now. Jan 8, 2012
Just got through swinging leads on this one.

Each pitch has individual character and challenges every climbing skill...maintains grade for entire length. Protection is good...used everything from small brass stoppers to a Number 4 cam.

First pitch is amazing; second pitch is indescribable; third pitch is tech and if the three previous pitches were not enough...the fourth pitch is burly and delicate at the same time! I found that the undercling roof section on the fourth pitch was well protected and in fact, the easiest part of the entire route. Getting off the deck on the fourth pitch was just damn hard.

If the team is doing the entire route...don't stop at the belay/rap station at the end of the second pitch and freeze in the shade. Continue for another 20-30' up and left to a comfortable platform in the sun and with a bomber belay anchor and good visual access of the remaining route and climbing above.

A true Adirondack classic! Sep 17, 2012
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Just finished this yesterday - might even write a post about our experience in the general forum. Climbed the whole thing onsight with John Dawkins from Vermont and led pitches 1,3 and 4 with John bagging a clean follow of pitch 1 and clean lead of pitch 2. Really one of the most epic and exhausting experiences I have had lead climbing on trad. After probably 5 or 6 grueling hours (we were admittedly slow and without enough water), a few lost nuts and a dropped alien, we topped out at dusk yesterday and my 4 hour car ride back to Ottawa felt like a dream.

That said, John and I both felt pretty strongly about some things regarding this climb that I think need to be said most of which is positive however some of which is a bit critical regarding P3 (nothing personal towards anyone). Let's see, where do I start?

- This climb is probably the best multi-pitch, high-exposure 5.10 pure trad route you will find in the Northeast. Certainly longer routes are available on Cannon Cliff but Poke-O is steeper and arguably more intimidating to climb.

- Those 4 pitches really feel more like 5 or 6 compressed pitches with the rope lengths (130 ft P2, 160 ft P3, 150 ft P4). Definitely you feel the exposure by the time you get to P3 and P4. It tops out the highest section of the cliff at nearly 500 feet.

- Dare I call it the "Mini Grand Wall of the East"? Then again I haven't done the Grand Wall.

- Try bringing a purple big-bro for P1 and for the anchor below the final pillar on P4. It protects beautifully and wasn't a clunker to haul around like those giant cams.

On the other hand however...

- Is it really necessary to keep this line devoid of at least one more bolt on P3? If we are going to call this a "classic" and assume others who fancy themselves to be 5.10 climbers might try it, does it matter that in fact this pitch is borderline R rated? There was the 15+ foot run-out above thin gear (purple metolius) to a rusty 1/4 inch bolt with super awkward balance clip that I barely made - a fall clipping there would easily be 45 feet onto thin gear. Just a couple feet below this was an obvious stance where the bolt could have been clipped much more safely but it was eschewed by the bolt driller. After this came some more techie 10c moves (imo) and a couple more placements before the 40(?) foot 5.6 runout. The 5.6 runout section could really use a bolt. It's got nothing to do with difficulty but rather the fact that its a total choss pile up there with rotten holds and vegetation. I nearly slipped there when I grabbed a loose slab and was standing on vegetation - would have been a 50+ foot whipper onto a thin nut. Is this really necessary to experience? Even in the Gunks, the guidebook tells you up front what you are getting into at least on the danger side so yeah I felt pretty blind-sided by pitch 3 which was only marked as "PG" in the guidebook.

- Grades on the pitches in my humble opinion are...

P1 - 5.9++ (i.e. 10a)
P2 - 10b (the stellar **** pitch)
P3 - 10c PG-13/R
P4 - 10c PG-13 (sequence pulling around the roof is runout-sketch yet again)

Admittedly this may have something to do with the facts that I have relatively weaker legs and calves than upper body. FG requires a lot more leg strength than I suspect many (sport) climbers are used to (my calves were completely torched on top of P4). However, even those grades would be considered stiff in most areas and would probably line it up more with say Index (old stomping ground) or Yosemite. Calling it 10a is kind of a joke imo - my partner couldn't even do the crux move on the 3rd pitch (he pulled on gear, climbs up to 5.11+ sport in Vermont) and fell a couple more times on follow on pitch 4 and that was after he lead pitch 2 clean. Without adding at least another bolt I strongly suggest giving it the proper PG-13+ rating it deserves. There is serious fall potential on P3 and you've got no business being up there if you aren't a solid 5.10+ face climber. I wonder if there haven't been at least a few serious accidents on this line already but maybe those upper pitches don't get done as much.

Apart from the sketch factor I totally loved this line. Really its a testament to the First Ascentionist (Dunn?) and their vision/boldness.

Also if anyone would be so kind as to hold on to my dropped red alien (at the base of P4, stopped somewhere in the slabs) I would be grateful though I am not holding my breathe. Aug 26, 2013
Mark Trotta
Latham, NY
Mark Trotta   Latham, NY
I just did this route less than a month ago, led all 4 pitches. I must say I’m very surprised at Colin’s comments; I’ve met him before, he’s a strong climber and appears to know his trad leading pretty well. However those meetings were in the gym and at Spider’s web, both of which are very different from Poke-o. And sure enough P3 and P4 of The Gun is much more quintessential of Poke-o. Both are thin; P3 is face climbing on thin features w/ thin gear and P4 is dihedral climbing with good gear.

Regarding the climbing grades, I think they’re spot on. I believe Derek Doucet, an apparent regular poke-o climber has better verbiage than I do, but I agree with his stance that the style of climbing (particularly on P3 and P4) is sort of a lost art and therefore appears a little more difficult to those new to the crag. If you’re dehydrated or physically exhausted, well that’s a different story, and I’d advise all visitors to prepare. I tanked up on water before leaving the ground to deal with the extended 4 hour round trip pack-to-pack. If you’re not sure how you might measure up to the style of climbing up there, my suggestion is to get on some of the easier or single pitch climbs that might get you exposed to this stuff before committing to The Gun. I just got off of the Great Dihedral, sans the Houdini slot, that might give you a taste for the legs required for P4, although it’s admittedly easier. Home Rule and/or Lost Chance might be good options to simulate the type of face climbing on P3. Neither of those last two are spectacular climbing, but they’re thin. One of them also requires thin gear, which is a good segway to that topic…

For the gear ratings, I believe they too are spot on, or at least consistent with the rest of ADK Rock gear ratings. I didn’t have any big-bro’s and only had up to a #4 Camelot (P1 can be protected on the right wall; look for a small crack over there). At the peak difficulty of climbing on P3, I don’t remember a 15 ft run out. This might be in part to some RPs I always carry to poke-o. Yeah it gets worse as you get higher, but it really starts to ease up in difficulty and I never had mental trouble. In fact my biggest challenge was building a gear anchor at the top of P3. By the way, to save gear, sling trees at the top of P2 for an anchor. As for the roof traverse on P4, there’s enough gear, you just need to find the good rock.

So my recommendation to visiting climbers is to get used to poke-o climbing on smaller endeavors first, strengthen up the legs, sharpen the small gear placement skills and tank up or bring water up The Gun when you get on it. (my feeling is Colin’s experience was due to exhaustion/dehydration more than anything else) Aug 27, 2013
Matt Glue
Boulder, CO
  5.10b PG13
Matt Glue   Boulder, CO
  5.10b PG13
I led it the day before Colin (hey dude!) and pretty much agree with Mark. I had various RPs and doubles down to micro-cams, and P3 never felt that runout (got in 2 solid RPs ~10 ft below the bolt). Maybe on the 5.6 part, but that's pretty normal all across the northeast on a route 2+ grades harder.

And yeah, bring water! Should have been obvious on a 500-foot climb, but I ended up flailing all over the last pitch despite gliding up the rest and (IMO) knowing how to climb dihedrals. My toes were cramping later that night. D'oh!

P2 is just damn amazing. Hard to imagine better climbing in the Northeast. Overall it's just hard to believe this climb exists, that 4 pitches of this quality can follow each other. Aug 27, 2013
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Hey Matt and Mark - good to hear from both of you!

I appreciate the feedback and definitely take what I say with a grain of salt but don't completely discount it either. To play further Devils' Advocate to my own comments it was the first trad climb I've been on this season (only did one other 5.10 at the New back in April) and yeah, my legs are pretty whimpy. I don't even go running anymore...

However I did have three distinct "oh shit" experiences. The first was cliping the bolt on P3 where I recall pulling out of the slab rest onto a delicate lie-back crimp rail and clipping the bolt - I was off balance and the bolt was way above my last peice. Once I clipped it I recall doing another hard move into some finger lock thing with smeared feet. Above that I nearly slipped again on 5.6 terrain which would have sent me to the hospital - I grabbed a loose peice of rock and leaned back on it only to feel it slide while my feet (on grass) slid too. Granted I probably wandered off into the wrong section a bit but its pretty overgrown up there. The last experience was pulling past the roof on P4 when my calves were fried and I only had one decent peice (fixed gear) back under the roof plus a micro grey #00 tcu I wedged in somewhere. I remember thinking "please no more stemming!" only to find another 15 feet of awkward stemming and no handholds. A final desperate stretch to a jug just before the lip marked the end of the ordeal for me.

Truth be told I am not very comfortable running it out on low angle stuff without something to hold onto. That's probably why I feel more comfortable on big roof climbs in the Gunks than slabby stuff in the daks. However having spent 6 of my early years climbing out west, I've never fully adapted to grades in the Champlain Valley region (Daks and Vermont) and I suspect other visiting 5.10 climbers say from a place like Squamish would have similar troubles. I don't know really know what the best way is to communicate to Poke-O noobs not to underestimate the grades/runouts at Poke-O other than giving things appropriate danger ratings. Also train your legs on other stem routes as Mark suggests and bring enough H2O. That said, when you give a route 5 stars and claim its the best multipitch of its grade in the east, it gives it a sort of Carnival Ride appeal that's hard to resist - I sure didn't!

Again though amazing line and definiely IF you are feeling strong and capable you should do this climb....

PS - This route totally fits the bill for this article:… Aug 27, 2013
Matt Glue
Boulder, CO
  5.10b PG13
Matt Glue   Boulder, CO
  5.10b PG13
The climbing around the bolt and the clip itself didn't feel too insecure to me, but I did take my damn time to figure it out (or I just stumbled into the right beta). And for the roof on P4, I placed something next to the manky fixed cam, and then got in a solid small cam at the very end of the roof crack.

Okay, that's enough discussion and beta for anybody who wants to try this route! If anyone wants the climb to be adventurous, ignore the above four posts. Ha... Aug 28, 2013
I just did this route, led pitches one and three. What a great route!

I too am surprised by Colin's opinion of pitch three. I thought it was the easiest of the four pitches. It has two hard bits, both of which are above small gear. But the gear in my opinion is good.

I had three micro nuts below the bolt-- the highest of these was just 6 feet below the bolt. These were small but good nuts.

I had tons of gear after the bolt, all the way to the belay ledge. I'm talking regular Camalots and Aliens, medium nuts... no creative stuff, just plenty of gear. No runouts. And the rock is fine. Not loose (by Poke-O standards-- there are some loose bits in cracks here and there, like EVERYWHERE else on the cliff).

Colin, I think you went off route (too far left?) after the bolt. Sep 29, 2013
Owen Chapman
Owen Chapman  
Just did this route today. I think the scariest part was reading some of the comments above on the drive down from Montreal. To our great relief it was fantastic, with good pro pretty much everywhere you need it (with very small nuts/peanuts for the bottom of pitch 3). Bring water for sure, and an energy bar for the last pitch. The 70m rappel tip is spot on. So is the suggestion for the belay station 20' up from the rap station at the top of pitch 2. Gobsmackingly good times. Sep 29, 2013
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
I guess I must have missed all those RP placements. I was at least two to three full body lengths between my purple tcu and the bolt. I remember looking for a small nut placement below the bolt and concluding there were none. That's not to say it wasn't there - just that I didn't find it.

Nope, didn't go too far left.

Below the bolt, farther left looked perhaps a bit easier but off route imo.

Also - There 100% is a loose flake in the runout section. Just because you didn't grab it doesn't mean it isn't there. If it were my home crag I would do my best to dislodge it safely.

To be honest Seth, I am having a really hard time taking your comment about "gear being everywhere" at the end of P3 seriously. Read the description here on MP that clearly says there's a run out at the end. "Plenty of gear everywhere" you say? Does that include a 35 foot runout? I looked. I am sure others did as well.

PS - I am really trying not to come off as rude or anything. Sometimes its just luck of the draw the way these things play out and believe me, I have been climbing a long time and very much aware of this. I have been involved in 2 serious climbing accidents so I prefer to play it a bit safer than some. Sep 30, 2013
Hey Colin, I take no offense at your comments and I meant none by mine.

If we are debating the area around the bolt, I just disagree about the climbing and the gear. I think the bolt is perfectly placed because the 5.10 move comes right after it. (The move to get to the bolt seemed like 5.8 to me.) And there is gear for the 5.8 move if you like micronuts.

About the 5.6 alleged run out/crappy rock, I again think it is overhyped. Here is a photo I just pulled up on my phone. This is no great shot but it may help a little.

The photo shows much but not all of the easier climbing and some of my last few placements. You can see two placements clearly and there is a third one you can't really see a little higher than the yellow cam and on the other side of the ropes, clipped to the pink rope, obscured by a little bush. Anyway the distances aren't that clear from the photo but there is no 35 foot run out. The bushes in the foreground are less than ten feet from the belay ledge. I think from the context of many of the above comments that you are a far stronger climber than I am and I did not feel creeped out at all by the pro situation.

The other thing that the photo demonstrates is that the rock at the end there is generally solid slab. There are a few bushes and cracks with loose crap but that is Poke-O, it isn't unusual. If you wander to either side you might find yourself standing on a bush and pulling on loose stuff-- and it has happened to me more than once!-- but it isn't necessary. My main concern about the bushes was that I thought some of that stuff might be poison ivy. But I didn't get a rash so I guess not. Oct 1, 2013
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Hey Seth,

Thanks for posting that pic. It actually clarifies completely both of our points. Turns out I didn't finish the way you did and its actually fairly easy to explain from the photo I have edited from your photo (the red arrow is where I went). I went to the right of the bushes in the left of the photo - that's where the loose flake is. I got suckered into it because, as you can see its a low angled ramp there and it seemed easier and more mellow. I figured I would go that way and just flick the rope over the bushes once I was at the top. However once I pulled on the loose flake and almost slipped (literally within centimeters), I traversed back left again (I did not down climb) thus I completely missed where you put your gear. That's not to say I would have placed anything where you did though I will take your word for it that it is solid. As a side note, I tend to prefer to run it out unless I am sure my gear will hold (for me its not worth placing it unless I am sure it will hold which pushes me either to climb with more confidence or find a better placement). The last peice of gear I placed was I think just at or below where you partner is in the photo - so yeah I was pretty darn runout and a fall would have been well, let's just not go there....


Oct 1, 2013
Did this route several weeks ago and thought I would share my thoughts. I would have to agree with others that this is possibly the best climb of its grade on the east coast. However, be prepared for full value 5.10 climbing on almost every pitch.

Bringing a #4 or even a #5 camalot is not a bad idea. The OW section section on P1 is not bad without this but it is useful for the belay below the last pitch. Definitely bring RPs or similar small nuts for P3.
P1. Calling this 5.9+ is a joke. Awesome and fairly sustained crack climbing.
P2. Amazing splitter twin cracks. Possibly the best pitch of 5.10a I've climbed, anywhere.
P3. There are a few thin moves before and above the bolt. Protection is decent if you have RPs or better yet, very small offset nuts. There is a slight runout towards the top but at this point the climbing is very easy comparatively.
P4. The usual finish was soaking wet when we did it. We opted for the 5.9+ variation to the left. It looked dry from the ledge. This ended up involving very thin crack and face climbing with multiple tiny nuts in a row for protection. It ended up being wet and runout climbing towards the top anyway. Terrifying. I would not recommend this finish, and I imagine it does not get done very often.

Amazing route but bring some small nuts and big cojones! Aug 13, 2014
Alissa Doherty
Boston, MA
Alissa Doherty   Boston, MA
This was my first climb in the Adirondacks and it didn't disappoint! Since there is quite a bit of banter here on the grade and pro for this climb I didn't know what to expect. I found it reasonable for the grade and with excellent protection throughout (as long as you have RPs for P3). I wouldn't compare the difficulty to the Grand Wall as one comment does. Me and my partner agreed it felt very true to the grade at 5.10-.

Another thing worth noting is that the wetness on P4 shouldn't stop you from finishing the climb. The upper corner and roof was quite wet when I led it but the holds under the roof are positive and gear plentiful. I'm not a particularly bold or strong climber so I was tempted by the siren song of bail gear left by other parties. I'm glad I went for it since it's easier than it looks and my follower snagged some booty gear.

Overall, and outstanding climb--particularly the stellar cracks on P2! Jul 13, 2015
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
"...I found it reasonable for the grade and with excellent protection throughout (as long as you have RPs for P3). I wouldn't compare the difficulty to the Grand Wall as one comment does. Me and my partner agreed it felt very true to the grade at 5.10-.

Another thing worth noting is that the wetness on P4 shouldn't stop you from finishing the climb. The upper corner and roof was quite wet when I led it but the holds under the roof are positive and gear plentiful....

I'm glad I went for it since it's easier than it looks and my follower snagged some booty gear.

OK, I will try to put this delicately so as not to stir up more controversy....

I'm concerned some noob will take your comment to mean "Yeah, it's just a nice casual scenic route. All 5.10 climbers should totally hop on it"...

Regarding Daks grades vs. Squamish (Grand Wall or otherwise)- while I have not climbed the Grand Wall I started climbing 5.10 cracks (base of the Chief) in Squamish more than a decade ago as well as nearby Index Washington which is a known sandbagged area (where I led up to 11a crack) - when I moved back east I got my butt handed to me in the Gunks, Vermont and the Daks in particular and had to dial it back. I can't think of a good reference point for comparing FG to 5.10 Squamish Grades. Exasperator? Not even close - Exasperator (10c) was one of my first climbs at Squamish in like 1998 (even lead the 10a section - second lead ever) and is significantly easier with much better pro than the last pitch on FG which has a burly hard move right off the ground, sustained stemming and a runout finish. I would maybe compare it in difficulty to Davis Holland 10c (4 pitches) at Index (the Crux pitch I followed clean in 1998 btw) vs. anything 5.10 I tried at Squamish. Perhaps my memory is fuzzy, perhaps my crack skills were better back then now that I sport climb more but it seems unlikely - frankly I was far weaker back then.

Not sure why anyone would think Poke-O 5.10's are the same as anywhere else but everyone is entitled to their own opinion and to speak from their own experience.

PS - That booty gear, if it is a red Alien, is possibly mine from 2013... Jul 16, 2015
Alissa Doherty
Boston, MA
Alissa Doherty   Boston, MA
I don't mean to cause controversy either but reading through these comments, I was unsure that I would be able to complete Fastest Gun and hesitant to even try it! Luckily my partner is pretty convincing. By commenting above, I wanted to provide a different perspective for 5.10 leaders who are unsure how they will measure up to this Dacks classic.

Fastest Gun is many grades easier and far less committing than the Grand Wall which I climbed a month ago. I also felt that the first 5.10a pitch of Exasperator was harder and more sustained than P2 of Fastest Gun which I also climbed a month ago (YMMV). I've climbed at Index and found the grades equally challenging (but that was a year ago so my memory could be foggy). I don't agree that P4 was runout.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I'm sure some my find your comments more valid than mine. I just want to put it out there that if you are a solid 5.10 leader, there is no reason to let this climb scare you off!

PS Booty gear was a nut and biner :) There's a nasty .75 in the roof that is should not be clipped (plenty of room to plug in your own) Jul 16, 2015
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Exasperator - really? harder than FG?

Do you think maybe your experience as a trad climber is deeper than perhaps you are letting on? You say "solid" 5.10 which I would agree with but each climber has to decide what that means for themselves. You and I can't make that decision for them - certainly not on a climbing site.

Haven't been back to Squamish in ages so I have no idea what it would feel like now but you're honestly the first person I've heard say Squamish low end grades are anything but soft.

I also led Nurse's Aid at the Gunks (10c R) and was less scared or runout and felt easier than FG.

PS - No more comments from me on this thread. You are free to respond but I'm all over it and I don't want to crowd out others... Jul 16, 2015
Hey I just want to chime in to say that grades are inherently subjective and everyone will have a different and often equally valid opinion-- the best we can do is reach some kind of general consensus over the years. Personally I think pitch one of Exasperator is easier than any pitch on Fastest Gun, so I agree with Colin there. But I disagree with him in other ways (as discussed above) and that's fine! Comparing the difficulty of Fastest Gun, Exasperator and Nurse's Aid is of limited value, in my opinion, because all three climbs have very different sorts of cruxes. We are talking about apples and oranges.

And it is debatable also whether runouts should factor into the perception of difficulty or not. I think your perception of danger had a big effect on your experience on pitch three, Colin, and I know I've been there myself-- maybe if you'd been happier with the gear it would have seemed less tense and difficult overall. I liked my small nuts before the bolt but others might feel less sanguine about that sort of pro-- I think the important thing is that anyone reading this discussion now has a pretty good idea of what to expect. Jul 17, 2015
Alissa Doherty
Boston, MA
Alissa Doherty   Boston, MA
I think everyone can agree that grades are really subjective! I commented to add to the diversity of opinions on this route and definitely not to call Colin out or sandbag anyone. For some folks (me!) Mountain Project is the resource used to determine whether or not they're capable of leading something safely and I added my two cents to help balance out the conversation. I learned to climb in New England, rarely sport climb, don’t mind small gear, and this route felt reasonable. If you’re like me, you may feel the same way...but then again, maybe you won’t... :) Jul 17, 2015
Colin R
Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Colin R   Ottawa, ON
  5.10c PG13
Alyssa - No offense taken. Of course you are free to share your opinion - don't let my own experience overshadow yours. Seth is correct in that everyone will have a different experience up there of both difficulty and danger. And he is also correct that people have a good idea of the possibilities up there now...

OK I am truly done posting on this route. Jul 18, 2015
City Dweller
New York, NY
City Dweller   New York, NY
So good!

RPs protect the 3rd pitch up to the bolt very well. The climbing above isn't really run out. The layback corner on pitch 4 is pretty strenuous. Pitch two just keeps coming.

What a climb! Oct 9, 2015
Nate K
Bozeman, MT
Nate K   Bozeman, MT
this really might be the best multipitch 5.10 ive ever climbed. so good, deserves all 4 stars. brought a double rack including some RPs. protection is all there. definitely not R rated Oct 12, 2016
The comments here make for an entertaining read, but don't get spooked.
The route finding is easy, the protection is great and the grade is fair. It's not a gimme and not a good first 5.10a, but you certainly don't need to be flashing 5.10d to fire this route. Outstanding climb. Oct 31, 2016
Molly Zhu
New york
Molly Zhu   New york
We climbed to the top of P3 only to find out P4 was a waterfall and there was no rap station on p3... Be careful after rain! May 30, 2017
Kyle vH
Kyle vH  
Easy route finding, good protection. Two short runouts are on very easy terrain, on p3 and the top out of p4. Four great pitches of varied 5.10-. P2 is long and wild. P4 is really unique and looks imposing but climbs brilliantly. Don't let one person's bad experience dissuade you--this is amazing and very approachable. Oct 4, 2017
Cres Simpson
Cambridge, MA
Cres Simpson   Cambridge, MA
Climbed P1 and P2 and bailed because P4 was rumored to be quite wet. P1&2 are beautiful and well protected. I did lug a #5 up for the low offwidth of P1 and was happy to have it (and make my second carry it as training weight after), but I'm sure folks who are better OW climbers than me could do without it. The offwidth is short and not hard but low to the ground.

Word of caution: we rapped with two ropes from the rap anchor atop P2 all the way to the ground and then were completely unable to pull our ropes (despite a tibloc, prussiks, and lots of trickery). I ended up ascending the ropes all the way back to the rap anchor, only to find they weren't stuck on and didn't have any obvious reason not to pull other than friction. I rapped again to the intermediate anchor atop P1 with both ropes only to find that I still could not pull my ropes even from the intermediate rap anchor.

I ascended again and managed to rap with a single rope from the higher rap ring which was on the chockstone only (not on the tree/chockstone combo which was slung with the rest of the tat) down to the intermediate station, pull my rope, and single rap again to the ground. My theory is that the two ancient links which were on the nest of tat were pinching together with all the mank and making it impossible to pull the ropes from below, though it's still not entirely clear to me why they wouldn't pull. I would caution parties to a) not double rope rap from the top of p2 and b) use the higher ring instead of the links, even though there's only a single piece of cord on it.

It would be awesome to simply have a bolted set of rap anchors which pulled cleanly, but since those are so much more unsightly than giant nests of decaying tat... Oct 9, 2018

More About The Fastest Gun