Notorious 5.9+ sandbags
|
|
Every semi-experienced trad leader knows that 5.9+ is actually a code for "sandbag troubles". I'd like to know what are the most notable sandbags you lead at 5.9+. The idea came after leading Where lizards dare, at Fortress Wall (RRG). FA in 1977, rated at 5.9+ in Ray Ellington/Dustin Stephen's guidebook. MP begs to differ at a 10b consensus, though some people got excited and rated at 10+.... even one 11a! A great climb nonetheless, and maybe the sandbag gives it a little... je ne sais quoi. It's just that it's not a good first 5.9 date.
|
|
|
5.9+ is the hardest grade in existence, therefore 5.9+ cannot be ‘sandbagged’. |
|
|
Kor-Ingalls on Castleton Tower Regular Route on Higher Cathedral Spire |
|
|
The horn at patackaway. Mountain projects consensus on grade still hasn’t changed that one but it has changed a lot of the other 9+ in New Hampshire and in the Adirondacks. All of the early 5.9s that I lead are now called 5.10 |
|
|
Will Manesswrote: Totally agree, but I would add “Where Lizards Dare” on the Fortress Wall at RRG |
|
|
Definitely not Yo Mama, that one’s easy |
|
|
Grand giraffe, eldo |
|
|
epitaph was called 9+, Sedona. |
|
|
The By Gully in Boulder Canyon is pretty hard. To the first anchors of Friday the 13th at Vedauwoo has spit many chest puffing green platers off. Steck-Salathe. Legit Theres some pissant little 5.8 warm up at the Rope De Dope crag at Smith, it might be the hardest route on that little pile. |
|
|
High Test at Seneca Rocks is another one to add to the list |
|
|
The Great Dihedral at Poko seemed pretty damn hard to me.... Its possible I got the beta all wrong; I really should do it again to see how it feels, but I'm a little bit scared of it. |
|
|
The Yawn and Crescent Arch in Tuolumne might fit in here. |
|
|
As Frank mentioned, anyone see a trend here? Off-widths and chimneys are notoriously difficult to grade with any accuracy - it depends so much on the climber's experience in those forms of climbing. I had a friend who was solid at 11+ (I think he even did an FFA at that grade of a route that was previously something like 5.7 A2) and due to his admitted lack of experience on OW felt P1 of The Yawn was the hardest thing he'd ever done. |
|
|
Hard Times 5.9+ @ Moss Cliff Adirondacks NY |
|
|
Marc801 Cwrote: Yeah, I'm sort of thinking that's true. But then other factors probably will make this even more variable, such as height (or maybe more generally body sizes & physiology). Being able to chicken wing in and OW, or NOT being able to, likely makes a huge difference in perceived difficulty. And/or perhaps we, collectively, just suck at OW. The Great Pioneers of the Days of Old knew how to climb that stuff. We have been spoiled with an abundance of clean splitters with easier access. So inevitably, a bunch of people climb it all wrong and grade it 11a. That adds value to Where Lizards Dare as a nice sandbag then, being a fingetips crack in a dihedral. |
|
|
Kor Ingalls definitely. I'm also suspicious of anything with a FA by a person named Lowe, regardless of the difficulty rating. |
|
|
Kai Larsonwrote: Or Dunn. |
|
|
Phobos |
|
|
For the Central Wasatch: Hangman Cost of Business Sin Nombre |
|
|
Canary at Leavenworth in WA (the pitch 1 mantle) South Face of Prusik Peak in WA (the "flaring chimney" pitch) Dastardly Crack at Beacon Rock in WA Walt Bailey at Devil's Tower |
|
|
bryanswrote: It's been a few years, but I don't know if I'd say it is a sandbag. It goes through more or less all the gamut of jam sizes, but I don't recall shutdown moves, or it being sustained to the point of being and endurance thing. I think I would call it a testpiece 5.9, more than a sandbag. |




