Dogs that bite
|
|
J Ewrote: You alway ask if you can pet a dog and / or give them a treat before you approach it. Sorry if I didn't state that. |
|
|
Bruno Schullwrote: You don't have to do everything your dog tells you. |
|
|
Chad Millerwrote: How many dog bites are followed by the phrase "omg he's never done anything like that!!!" |
|
|
J Ewrote: These are the same people who fail to realize a dog wagging their tail is not always done out of joy, or that licks are not always done out of compassion. Nervous (often the precursor to an attack) behavior often mimics joyous behavior. |
|
|
". . . the great majority of reasonable dog owners." Leaving aside the oxymoron; three, four at the most? |
|
|
Charlie Bwrote: You had the dog off trail and on leash. It was under control. That's the bottom line. If a dog is unleashed AND it wanders around getting into other's stuff, fighting other dogs, barking incessantly, etc. it's not in control. THAT is the problem. Not that a dog happens to be at the crag. If a dude is so unaware that he stumbles off trail within 3 feet of a 12 year old girl and a dog that's on him. The fact that he did that and did NOT get bit because you had an appropriate length leash shows you did nothing wrong. I'd probably do the exact same thing. If I had a 12 year old daughter and I'm preoccupied with climbing and can't protect her I damn well would have a dog there leashed to protect her, and the being protective and nippy is a bonus. Now that dog should never be along the base of a crag where people are walking by and it could bite someone, but entirely different situation if it's off trail and someone needs to be clueless to end up within leash distance. |
|
|
I've had and seen mixed results when trying to blend climbing with other priorities: dogs, child care, picnics, romance, partying etc. What we do is dangerous. The base of a cliff is dangerous. "This is this." |
|
|
Kenny Parkerwrote: They are aware. They're always aware. Awareness isn't the problem. Entitlement is. SUE. |
|
|
J Ewrote: I'm gonna throw a random number out there, it's 100%. |
|
|
Jake Joneswrote: I think the culture (particularly American) of immediately suing people if you don't approve of them is a form of entitlement. |
|
|
Bruno Schullwrote: Bruno, this is an unfair and knee jerk characterization of Americans. It is simply not true. More often than not, we turn first to gun play and bypass the legal system altogether. Please don’t spread vicious rumors. |
|
|
@ Dr. Hypocritical...did you make a new account just to reply to this thread? Actually, to be honest, I have no idea if the US is more or less litigous than other countries. People in the US certianly seem more prone to sue but is that actually the case? I'm no legal expert, but I found some data rather quickly that does suggest the US is more litigous. "The U.S. has about a quarter more suits per capita than does the U.K., but 3.3 times as many Source: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Ramseyer_681.pdf Anyway, I like Mark's take on this. "Shoot first, sue later." |
|
|
Bruno Schullwrote: Aren’t you pro dog though? |
|
|
Not Not MP Adminwrote: Absolutely. I was simply trying to characterize the prevailing anti-dog sentiment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gloweringwrote: You actually climb somewhere where you might fear for a family members well-being? This thread has devolved into a squabble. People bickering, for the sake of bickering. |
|
|
|
|
|
Glen Priorwrote: Do you have a point to make? Or just jumping into the squabble for the sake of bickering? |
|
|
Glen Priorwrote: Well, if you go read the Charlie Barrett thread you'll find that even Yosemite is not perfectly safe. |




