New and Experienced Climbers Over 50 #10
|
|
I have a Dream (plan)... |
|
|
Pertinent... |
|
|
Lori Milas wrote:Day 2. Working on an attitude adjustment. That looks lovely. I used to hate slab, but with the right shoes and attitude it can be really fun. You can use a surprising amount of core slab climbing too. |
|
|
Hi Carl... I truly love this rock. What I don't understand is how I could be working out hard in the gym consistently for several years, and still be severely sore and challenged on the most basic climbing here. No time like the present to rebuild my own musculature to be able to handle these rocks. (Saw a whole 4 people here yesterday in the park. Not a woman in sight.) |
|
|
Hi Lori. The wife is back. But distancing myself from her, as well as virus carrying humans might be a good idea. You're right, climbers don't mind hardship, even the occasional bin (dumpster) dive. Camp Sandy is quite remote really, and I'm thinking there will be very few International visitors around. |
|
|
Carl Schneider wrote: Pertinent... That's a good one Carl, thanks. He seems to suggest just climbing a little higher and falling a little more each time. Worth a try anyway. |
|
|
I would like to draw a little focus on falling vs catches as it relates to angle. It's just a cautionary thing. You have been posting situations of vertical 90 degree and negative angle (overhung) routes and good catching tactics. I don't really think that will work as well on positive angle climbs like I do. Back bone above belly button. So, for the very experienced climbers here, would you ever consider trying to do a "soft" catch on low (positive) angle climbs? |
|
|
Dallas R wrote: I would like to draw a little focus on falling vs catches as it relates to angle. It's just a cautionary thing. You have been posting situations of vertical 90 degree and negative angle (overhung) routes and good catching tactics. I don't really think that will work as well on positive angle climbs like I do. Back bone above belly button. So, for the very experienced climbers here, would you ever consider trying to do a "soft" catch on low (positive) angle climbs? On less than vertical climbs, the shorter the fall the better. Not only should you likely not do a soft catch, but as Guy mentioned, if you can reel in rope during the fall, even better. |
|
|
Dallas R wrote: I would like to draw a little focus on falling vs catches as it relates to angle. It's just a cautionary thing. You have been posting situations of vertical 90 degree and negative angle (overhung) routes and good catching tactics. I don't really think that will work as well on positive angle climbs like I do. Back bone above belly button. So, for the very experienced climbers here, would you ever consider trying to do a "soft" catch on low (positive) angle climbs? Dallas.... No way, low angle stuff requires a “extra hard catch” Reeling in as much slack as possible just as soon as you know, for certain, your leader is falling. Thinking about Yosemite granite here. At Suicide there is a climb named “ReBolting Development”. 5.10D IIRC clipping the 3rd bolt is a no fall zone, getting onto the little dish/bump that was the drilling stance is about 10a. If you blow it and your belayer doesn’t do anything you will deck out, from about 70 feet up! This type of belay expertise was quite common on what is now called “Trad”. Other, mostly dead now, skills needed were “bracing yourself” so you were in a strong stance to catch a fall. Standing in a good spot to help keep the pro in place at the beginning of a climb looks to be a lost art.Q for you because I know that you’re on the road. Right now I’m waiting to pick up my friend at SF Intl, we are then going to Sears Point Raceway to fetch two car haulers and drive them to Edmonton Canada (the race has been canceled). You can still get fuel on the interstate? We camp out in one of the haulers. |
|
|
Dallas R wrote: So, for the very experienced climbers here, would you ever consider trying to do a "soft" catch on low (positive) angle climbs? Only if I were belaying someone I hate. |
|
|
Senor Arroz wrote: LOL! |
|
|
Dallas R wrote: I would like to draw a little focus on falling vs catches as it relates to angle. It's just a cautionary thing. You have been posting situations of vertical 90 degree and negative angle (overhung) routes and good catching tactics. I don't really think that will work as well on positive angle climbs like I do. Back bone above belly button. So, for the very experienced climbers here, would you ever consider trying to do a "soft" catch on low (positive) angle climbs? Right. Personally, I want the catch to be as fast as possible on low angle slab or ledgy (positive angle) routes, and that's what Bill and I are used to doing (although we haven't fallen a whole lot). |
|
|
I asked my partner to define 'low angle' the other day and he took a long pause... didn't have a definition. What do you say? |
|
|
Climbing nowhere. Gyms are closed. Road trip out of the question. Teaching online. Getting in great shape though. Working the hangboard hard. Be back maybe by end of summer I think. But I have resigned myself to not climbing for months. |
|
|
Lori Milas wrote: I asked my partner to define 'low angle' the other day and he took a long pause... didn't have a definition. What do you say? Anything less than vertical. Debating the responsibility of going climbing. University is closed, tomorrow will be snow, today is nice. Might go to some obscure place far away with a long approach, will bail if others are there. Trying to do the right thing. |
|
|
ErikaNW wrote: Thank you, Erica. I was just thinking that outside of a very short time in the grocery store--where I covered everything in hand sanitizer, I haven't had contact with a soul in 10 days. Here in Josh, the park is about empty. I saw a vague figure about a quarter mile away on Monday... Not saying it couldn't happen. |
|
|
I do think some of the buying patterns are regional. Living in a very health conscious area, I’ve had a hard time finding produce in my stores. Including frozen vegetables. Non meat options (tofu, etc) all gone. It’s interesting. I’ll be looking forward to putting my garden in. Stay well everyone. |
|
|
Guy Keesee wrote: I have not seen fuel as an issue. With the call to stop non-essential travel and the talk of topping off the national fuel reserve and the falling prices it appears we will have fuel for a while. |
|
|
On top of everything else, we woke up to an earthquake this morning. For Californians, 5.7 is probably no big deal, but it sure got our attention! Preparing for locusts next... |
|
|
Elisa R wrote: For Californians, 5.7 is probably no big deal, but it sure got our attention! 5.7 is a very decent sized shake! Even a 5.6 if you're close to the epicenter gives a pretty strong jolt. I've been living in CA for 40 years and have felt a lot of them, and for some reason, whenever I feel one, I say "Ride 'em, Cowboy". I don't find them frightening. They are over so quickly! Kind of like an unexpected lead fall. The real issue, like a fall, is not the moment, but the aftermath. |










