|16,111 page views|
Good page? (6 likes)
Hiking across the face on the highest, grassy ledg...
This route is the north face of Vestal. Walk up the low angle bottom part until you get to a large, grassy ledge that diagonals up and right. This is where I roped up, but there is a large ledge with boulders sitting on it 2.5 pitches up that is visible from here that would also provide a good spot to rope up. There are many possible routes, this is the one that I took. The first 3 or 4 pitches are very easy. Head up toward the blocks that are visible above that are to the right of a large right facing dihedral. On the fourth pitch, the face begins to become more blocky and steeper. The fifth and sixth pitches are the hardest (maybe spots of 5.5) and the most fun as the face transitions to low angle and smooth to steep and blocky. Pitches 7-9 continue up a sort of bowl in the upper part of the face with ledges separated by steps and end on a false summit. From here, follow a trail south and up to the summit. It isn't necessary to stay roped up, but there is still exposure. All pitches were full 60 meter pitches, basically climb until you run out of rope and find an anchor.
Bring a set of stoppers, a few larger hexes (I brought Metolius #7-9 and used them a lot) and some finger to hand sized cams. I used the #0.5-2 Camalots I had many times, but only used the #3 once or twice. A couple more finger sized cams would have been helpful. The only fixed gear I saw were two old pitons, one about halfway up, and one near the top. Good anchors were difficult to find at first, but after the first few pitches they were easier to find. I placed very little gear except for anchors, since I wanted to save the cams I had for the anchors, and placing passive pro was usually time consuming and difficult.
John and Lori approach the second belay ledge (we ...
The view up the face from the end of the grassy le...
Diana topping out on our last belayed pitch.
Diana and Meredith short-roping on the upper, brok...
Looking down from near the top of the face
Scott on bullet quartzite, with surprisingly few g...
Brian Gaschler leading his block. Wham Ridge, Ves...
Camped below the Vestal
Looking down Wham Ridge from the top of the face. ...
Vestal Peak and Wham Ridge as viewed from the Nort...
Brian Hansen (l) and Parker Newby, Wham Ridge, 198...
Wham Ridge. With Nathan Smith doing something.
Which way's up? Is up real? Or is it all relative?
Clouds moving in early on Vestal Peak. Taken from ...
Unknown climbers on Wham Ridge.
Super fun scrambling on solid rock is the name of ...
The Wham Ridge on Vestal Peak.
Hanging out on the summit.
Starting up Wham Ridge.
On the hike up to Vestal.
Cruisin' up the Wham.
The Colorado State Flower on Arrow looking towards...
Somewhere in the middle.
Looking down from near the top of Wham Ridge on Ve...
|By George Bell|
From: Boulder, CO
Aug 20, 2002
FA: Rit Burrows, Werner Schnackenberg and Jim Patterson, 7/18/1941. Garry Roach's 13er guide has a detailed description of this route, and claims that the rather right (west) you go on the ridge (face, really) the easier it is.
|By John Saccardi|
Aug 23, 2002
I did a line on the Wham Ridge sometime in the mid 1980's over a July 4th weekend. It was very "Flatiron"-like: lower angle down low, steeper higher. I recall the roped climbing to be easy, but I do remember a big slab of old ice cutting loose and crashing into many pieces just a few hundred feet right of our line. The descent off the backside was steep 4th class, but uneventful. We also did a nice line, slightly harder, on the east side of Arrow Peak right next door. This is a beautiful valley for camping and alpine rambling off the beaten track.
|By Kevin Craig|
Jul 7, 2003
We did this route on 7/1/03. Vestal and Arrow were totally bare of snow unlike many other north-facing slopes we could see. The Trinities had snow left in their east-facing gullies. The route info in the Roach & Roach 13'er book is right on! Hike up to the highest grassy ramp, traverse all the way to the right edge of the face, hike up low angle rock to a broken ledge on the right edge of the face, rope up, climb a 60m pitch up an obvious crack system (excellent pro) to another big ledge, climb another crack (crux) with excellent pro to another big ledge - 60m, if you choose, climb another pitch of 100' or so to yet another big ledge where the broken upper face begins. From here solo or short-rope/simulclimb to the summit up an obvious broken gully and face.
The 5.4 route is definitely not an "s" climb unless you rope up *way* early (and maybe not even then).Experienced teams competent at the grade will likely feel the desire for a rope/belay only for the middle (crux) pitch I've described (we had a relative newbie to technical alpine rock along). Anchors were all slung blocks/boulders. My rack: 1 set of nuts, tri-cams (pink thru 2nd blue), Aliens (green - orange), Friends (2.5, 3, 3.5), 5 shoulder-length slings with 'biners, 5 double-length slings with 'biners.This was more than enough. No really big or small gear needed. A 60m rope is very advisable to get to the good belays. Have fun! I'll post pictures soon.
Definitely not an "s" climb. Excellent pro.
|By Anonymous Coward|
Aug 27, 2003
Did the 5.4 route 8/19/03 with a team of three. This was our first multi-pitch trad route and it was amazing. Never had trouble finding ample protection. The route has a lot of class 4 moves, so felt comfortable with long runouts, though could have easily put pieces in. Route finding was relatively easy... after the solid pitches, you get to 1 pitch with lots of loose rock. Pro is still easy, just mind the rockfall. At the top of this, you go through kind of a keyhole, out onto the grassy ledges. We weren't entirely comfortable going unroped straight up the ledges (after the bottom ledge is a huge drop) so we switch-backed up and to the right, and then roped in again for one final pitch. We had two sets of stoppers, could have gotten by with one. Tri-cams from 0.5 to 3, and doubles on the smaller sizes, and then friends 2X1, 2 and 3, and I don't think we used the 3. Haven't really gotten comfortable using hexes yet; we brought BD 8, 9 and 10, but only used the 8. I think we had about 4 triple and 3 double slings for slinging boulders. There were only three places where we had to extend a piece of pro longer than a quickdraw. We had a 50m rope, but a 60 really would have helped as we had a couple of pitches cut short. We did the class 2 route down the south side. From the summit to the south is the class 4 route. Walk towards it and then a little to the left, you should see a cairn over the ridge on the left leading to the class 2 gully. All-in-all, a great climb, highly recommended. Oh yeah, and if you see my #11 stopper stuck at about the third belay, can you grab it for me?
|By Steve Nutting|
Sep 11, 2003
Myself, Karen B, and Joel A, climbed this route 8/21/03. This was an incredible route, very nice, solid rock, beautiful views, good pro.
We started the route at 8:00 am and roped up at the top of the grassy ledges. We simulclimbed/shortroped most of the route, except for three fast pitches around the route's crux (5.4). Even on those three pitches, both seconds simulclimbed with a belay and about 15' between them. All the climbing was easy, ranging from low angle friction to buckets. We had some difficulties on the upper section finding a nice clean line, but never encountered anything there harder than upper 4th class. The pro was generally excellent, though I didn't feel the need to place often. We reached the summit just after noon, enjoyed lunch and the view, then headed down the Southeast gully route. The descent route is a little scary in places, be especially careful on the "dues collector" scree slope between Arrow and Vestal.
Rack: 1 60 m rope, 1 set nuts, cams from small TCUs to #3 Camalot, Tricams .5-3, 2 quickdraws, 2 2' runners, 3 4' runners, webbing & cordalette for anchors. This was more than enough gear. Oh, and we found your #11 nut -- used it but couldn't get it out either.
Another climber reported climbing the route the day before--he says he soloed it in one hour.
|By Matt Juth|
Aug 19, 2005
Been a while, but I do remember it being a wonderful route in an amazing place. There are also a couple other good lines up the North Face
Jan 30, 2007
Fun mountain in a great setting. We hiked in a short (80ft.) rope and some nuts but ended up just soloing it. Super fun! I'd call it 5.6, at least the way we went. I couldn't have been too far off route, because I passed a fixed pin near the top.
I lost my gps on the approach (somewhere in between Elk Creek and Vestal Basin), so if you find a gps summit, lemme know!
|By Craig Childre|
From: Lubbock, Texas
Mar 12, 2008
My uncle Mark took this route on back in the late 80s. Waffle stompers, with a touch of rain to keep it interesting, and no rope. Together with Lance, they opted for the most direct line straight up the middle of the face. It was fun to watch from camp, when the clouds lifted enough.
From: Los Alamos, NM
Oct 10, 2008
Trip report from our climb on July 2, 2005.
Jul 30, 2009
Encountered some scary rockfall on the unstable screefield at the end of the descent. It's hard to imagine not sending a lot of large, loose stuff down, no matter how careful you are.
Does anyone have any experience with hugging the base of the cliff for this part of the descent? Our afterthought was that that might be a better way to go.
Apart from this part of the descent, fantastic climb. The view from the top is extraordinary.
|By Sam Rushing|
Jun 26, 2010
Tim and I just got back from the Vestal yesterday, June 25th, 2010. We climbed Wham on June 21st. We did go by the piton as well as a cam. The weather couldn't have been better. From the video, you'll see we started on the right cracks. Also we have a shot of our gear. It was good to read Roach beforehand. Wish it was an easier downhill climb back to Vestal. It took us almost 14 hours from camp back to camp. We climbed in heavy hiking boots. The slide show is below. It was a fantastic alpine trad climb on great quartzite. Very much worth the hike.
|By Matt Thorum|
From: Urbana, IL
Jul 20, 2010
Had the route to ourselves last week. Fun climbing with good pro when you want it, pretty run out over the easy ground, the actual 5th class sections are short. Classic for its appearance and setting. Got off route climber's right up high and had to make a few more moderate 5th class moves before downclimbing left off a ridge into the 4th class "bowl" that heads up to the top.
From: Santa Monica, Ca.
Jul 30, 2010
Matt, that is the finest group of pictures of that area that I have ever seen. It took me right back there, my brain had started to lose the memory of the grandeur of that magical place.
An old climbing buddy of mine and Outward Bound instructor (mid to late '70s), John Lafferty, used to take groups of students up that thing in K-mart flip flops that he had altered into "climbing flops" by putting Vibram soles on the bottom and Astro Turf on the top!
|By Matt Payne|
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Aug 2, 2010
Thanks for the kind words. Sounds like he was making the first version of Chacos haha. :-)
|By Chris Wenker|
From: Santa Fe
Sep 20, 2010
The direct start from the lower right-hand side of the face adds several hundred feet of fun slab leading directly up to the main grassy ledge. Mostly 3rd, a little 4th class; easy solo. Nowhere near 5.3, as reported by Roach.
Jan 12, 2011
Have wanted to do this route for 3-4 years in a one day push, but only one crazy partner who never seemed available. Finally got the ok this past Aug. 2010. Despite very bad weather, we headed to CO and somehow we got a window. All went well except for getting onto the trail above the train tracks, other than it goes fast. Got spit on at the base of the climb, we waiting and miraculously it dried up (gotta love granite and sunshine). Hiked off the back (chose the 4th class descent, doh), but nonetheless made it back out.
What a beautiful trip....a one day push is the ultimate way to go..fast and light
From: Durango, Colorado
Jun 19, 2011
Did it in a day from Molas Pass...not bad at all, and definitely the way to go. Bring a small pack with some food, clothes, and a little water (plenty along the way). Can't imagine humping all that gear in for this thing, it's mostly 4th class. Outstanding outing.
|By Kyle Christie|
From: Davis, CA
Feb 19, 2012
Why does this route warrant the R rating? Not much discussion whether it's actually an R climb. Thanks.
From: Santa Monica, Ca.
Feb 22, 2012
Maybe because it's so easy and fun, and steepens so gradually, that complacency lulls you into not placing protection until you get to your belay. I know that happened to me.
|By Ray Hellinger|
From: Pagosa Springs, CO
Jul 3, 2012
The only way you could give this route and R, is if you are roping up. If you fall without a rope in some spots, it's an X. However, no one uses a rope as it's not really needed if you have some climbing experience. A non-climber "peak bagger" could get hosed on this route. Someone died here a few yrs ago. Anyway, I seriously don't know where the 5.4 rating comes from. It's just "easy fifth class" (is there any such thing as 5.4? haha).