Climbing grades indoor vs outdoor
|
Connor Dobsonwrote: That's a good point. It would be interesting if there were a study, or at least a survey, to see how well plastic translates to rock. My perspective is limited to my own experience and the experiences of friends. Again... as far as exercise goes, it's definitely more fun than moving dumbbells around. |
|
I've come to accept that outdoors and indoors are just 2 separate but related disciplines. I climb on 5.11s in the gym but struggle up 5.8-5.9 outdoors. Seeing and using the holds on real rock is it's own skill that you have to practice. It may also just be me, but once you get into the 5.10s outdoors the difficulty curve seems to lessen a bit. Falls become less dangerous with no big ledges to land on, and less hold options mean the beta is more obvious. Foot holds are smaller and less visible, but your rubber sticks much better. |
|
Connor Dobsonwrote: Surely the fact that two drop out boulderers from the UK national team can go, and not just sent 5.14, but send the fking Changing Corners on the Nose, puts this to bed?Indoor climbing can be extremely technical and an excellent preparation. Of course you still have to put in the hours and days outdoors though to bring it across. |
|
Sam Mwrote: I don’t think these crusty fellas know how technical comp problems and routes are these days |
|
John Clarkwrote: I think it's mostly protecting ego hence my comment of "yeah but let's see them on 5.8 handcrack" above |
|
Connor Dobsonwrote: You watch any comps lately? No-tex hand jam and fist jam on an overhang. Not 5.8 looking |
|
John Clarkwrote: That would be 5.8+ in the valley /s |
|
John Clarkwrote: To be fair there are certainly a lot of indoor boulder bros that get addicted to e.g. the kilter board and hate slabs. And indoor lead climbers also avoid it (gotta have squeeky clean whips!) But the actual competition boulderers take slabs very seriously, and train on them all the time. Every comp set has a slab and even if you don't like it you can't afford to write off 1/4 of the climbs. |
|
Connor Dobsonwrote: Correlation does not equal causation. Sharma also climbed 5.11 or 5.12 his first time in the gym
This. |
|
Not Not MP Adminwrote: Technically…sharma was a proto-comp kid |
|
John Clarkwrote: No |
|
Not Not MP Adminwrote: Denial is not just a river in egypt |
|
Connor Dobsonwrote: Sam Mwrote: This comparison is flawed. You should look at the middle of the distribution, not the tail. Climbing 5.14a/b is piss to people competing at this level, who are extremely talented and genetically gifted. All this demonstrates is that you have a poor understanding of climbing difficulties at higher grades and the ability of professional athletes. There are scores of people with regular jobs (and even kids) climbing 5.14. Regardless, the average gym climber does not climb the same grade outside, and often has poor technique. I agree that there is overlap, but I think this is more due to training strength and capacity rather than developing good technique. It helps if you explicitly dedicate your indoor sessions towards improving skills that are relevant outside. |
|
John Clarkwrote: Do explain then. How was Sharma a proto-comp kid? Even if your argument holds some merit, Sharma got booted from comp scene before any of the comp climbs were even “compy”. |
|
Not Not MP Adminwrote: That reminds me of the scene in Rampage where they are in the middle of an outdoor bouldering road trip and they make a quick stop at the X-Games. Sharma wins and picks up a check to help fund their continuing road trip. That definitely would not happen these days with modern comp climbing. |
|
Pino Pepinowrote: I've sent almost a number harder on a rope outside and boulder the same grades. There are also not "scores" of people climbing 5.14 lol |
|
There's probably at least 40 people climbing 5.14, so that would be scores of people. |
|
Israel Rwrote: |
|
Israel Rwrote: There are that many people climbing 5.15 probably. |
|
Israel Rwrote: You forgot a 0 |