Fact: The Prana Zion Stretch pants aren't that great.

John Wilder wrote: I’ve been climbing in the Zions for almost a decade and I still have my first pair- zero holes and probably 1000 pitches on ‘em. Ymmv, I guess.

Same story here, my zioneers are 6 years in going strong.

The red pant looks ok. yellow is for traffic safety, Fire/rescue or visibility on mountains. Only missing the reflective when lit up stripes.
“The Solution Pant is equally suited for day in, day out climbing or the Saturday night pub-crawl” ha ha ha!

Check these out, yea gawdz!

patience + eBay
Zions work great for me and I don't think I've ever paid over $40 for a pair. Scored some new ones for less than $20 last week

Update: I've been using the Wrangler Straight Fit 5 Pocket Pant from Walmart. They are plenty stretchy for unrestricted movement. The price is right. I've mostly used them for bouldering and gym climbing as it's winter, but so far they have held up well. They definitely seem more durable than the Zion pant. I bought a second pair. 

Still wear mine at least a few times a week and most times climbing.

C Archibolt wrote: I've had at least 6-7 pairs over the years. Yes, they are very lightweight. Yes, the fabric is nice and stretchy for easy movement. Yes, the zipper pocket, on the men's version, fits a phone or Cliff bar really well. However, after years of loyal support and endorsement of these pants, I've come to see the truth: Prana Zion Stretch pants really aren't that great.

First of all, the fit is baggy, loose, and dumb-looking.

More importantly, the fabric is softer than a Red Rocks trade route. I've completely blown out the knees and butt on a pair of Zion Stretch pants in as little as six months. My wife sews them back together, but the patches just rip off. The fabric isn't hearty enough to hold a stitch. Maybe if I was one of those pansy gym climbers, dead set on "ruining climbing," these pants would last me a few years. But as an all-around rock climber, I need something more durable. I don't want to spend $85 every year, and I definitely don't want to send a pair of pants to the landfill every year.

When I search the forums for "climbing pants recommendations," I see page after page of people raving about the Prana Zion Stretch pants. I get it. I used to be like you. However, I suspect that many of us think the Zion Stretch pant is great only because we don't know any better. There has to be a better pair of pants for rock climbers.

What do you got MP? Give me your recommendations. I want something durable but also breathable and non-restrictive. 

They do make a slim fit pair. Only ones i wear bow. Girlfriend came home with a regular pair once, and I took them right back for a slim fitting pair. But your right, they are not the best and for the price, i fee they should be a bit more dirable in the knees. 

Santa Claus wrote: Check these out, yea gawdz!

These pant's inspiration?

C Archibolt wrote: Update: I've been using the Wrangler Straight Fit 5 Pocket Pant from Walmart. They are plenty stretchy for unrestricted movement. The price is right. I've mostly used them for bouldering and gym climbing as it's winter, but so far they have held up well. They definitely seem more durable than the Zion pant. I bought a second pair. 

Update to my update: I bought that second pair of Walmart pants in February, and the knee is already blown out. I've decided that "It's not you; it's me." Ask any of my partners: I use the "alpine knee" often. It's like my signature move. I've even thrown some double alpine knees when I'm really cruxin. 

I think I have three options:

1. Improve my footwork 
2. Only climb in double-knee Carhartts
3. Accept that I will burn through 2-3 pants a year

I choose option 3, and therefore I'm going to continue buying Walmart pants because they are 1/4 the cost of Prana pants and they last me just as long. 

My latest pairs of Prana Zions are disappointing. My first pair was amazing, and is still in good shape (but too big for me now--have lost a lot of weight since I started climbing). But I've gotten three more pairs since then and they've all god holes. If they were in the knees I would not care--not at all. But they're in the groin area, and while I think my boxers are nice, I don't feel the need to show everyone. Whatever changes they've made to the fabric or cut have made it so they don't tolerate Gunks high-step mantles.

David K wrote: My latest pairs of Prana Zions are disappointing. My first pair was amazing, and is still in good shape (but too big for me now--have lost a lot of weight since I started climbing). But I've gotten three more pairs since then and they've all god holes. If they were in the knees I would not care--not at all. But they're in the groin area, and while I think my boxers are nice, I don't feel the need to show everyone. Whatever changes they've made to the fabric or cut have made it so they don't tolerate Gunks high-step mantles.

When I hear "high step," I think "alpine knee." 

EDIT: Yes, I am sponsored by Walmart.  ;) 

C Archibolt wrote: 

When I hear "high step," I think "alpine knee." 

EDIT: Yes, I am sponsored by Walmart.  ;) 

Haha! Yeah, that works sometimes, but:

1. A lot of stuff I'm on these days has high steps onto little tiny indents or crimps that wouldn't support a knee. Examples: Mitty Mouse (step up into an indent that's barely more than a smear), Classic (2-3 high step smedges), Junior (the crux for me is trying to stab my right toe into a waist-height slot before I lose my grip on the awful left thumb catch or lose my balance).
2. I wouldn't climb in pants if I cared about the knees of the pants, but I care about my actual knees! I don't mind bleeding for the send, but I don't choose it if there are other options.

C Archibolt wrote:

Update to my update: I bought that second pair of Walmart pants in February, and the knee is already blown out. I've decided that "It's not you; it's me." Ask any of my partners: I use the "alpine knee" often. It's like my signature move. I've even thrown some double alpine knees when I'm really cruxin. 

I think I have three options:

1. Improve my footwork
2. Only climb in double-knee Carhartts
3. Accept that I will burn through 2-3 pants a year

I choose option 3, and therefore I'm going to continue buying Walmart pants because they are 1/4 the cost of Prana pants and they last me just as long. 

When I was a boy and all the cool kids were wearing Levis, my mother made me wear Toughskins from Sears. Not only that, she pre-emptively ironed patches into the knee area to prevent holes. I'm sure that saved her some money but it also made me walk like the Tin Man before he got oiled.

I'm never happier than when I'm tearing holes in some pant knees as an adult.

Whatever happened to white painter's pants? Anyone still climb in them? Along with the requisite rugby shirt and bandana (or Henry Barber hat), of course...

Daniel Joder wrote: Whatever happened to white painter's pants? Anyone still climb in them? Along with the requisite rugby shirt and bandana (or Henry Barber hat), of course...

...and the red or green swami belt of 3" webbing

Matt Clay wrote: Why wear pants at all?

OW nuff said.

Marc, 6-8 wraps of 1-inch webbing will do!

Daniel Joder wrote: Marc, 6-8 wraps of 1-inch webbing will do!

Of course! The wider webbing more stylish though. I really don’t recall if it was 2” or 3”. 

Honestly I patched the knees on mine after they broke through, going strong with the newer tougher fabric on the knees... They took the repair well.

I bought a pair of the Zioneer (slimmer version of the Zion) on sale 2 years ago, and they are my favorite climbing pants hands down.

To each their own, I guess.