New and Experienced Climbers over 50
|
|
PS Honnold got on my 5.13b R on tr at little ole Tick Rock took several burns and could not do it. so don't believe all you hear in the climbing news. |
|
|
Jeffrey Constine wrote: Carl, Top roping a route into submission then leading it, the rating no longer applies. normally the rating is for the on-sight, that's it. I'm just a lowly intermediate climber who's pretty impressed watching someone work a really hard route until they send it. To each his (or her) own. |
|
|
yea working it from the ground up leading taking whippers is better. (It's not a send on TR). |
|
|
Jeff, would you also reject redpoint-based sport climbing rating systems like that prevailing at Spearfish Canyon? I am agnostic on this myself... and Elephants route at Rushmore that I referred to in earlier post is 5.10 not 19! No I haven’t outclassed Ondra and then some:)! |
|
|
knock off a few letter grades on a redpoint because now you have first hand knowledge of the route. On Sight is the true grade. |
|
|
Or in their case add at least a grade as their system is based on the climber knowing which pockets (steep limestone there) to use and which red herrings to avoid. Have you ever climbed at Custer State Park?Onsight Ground up ethic still prevails there nearly totally -scary ass place to lead for sure. One of its last stands...No power drills and no rap bolting permitted. Too scary for me most days that I am up there in the Black Hills, but it sounds like you might like it. |
|
|
Haha, I've done a ton of climbing in Custer State Park, going way way back to the first ascent of the Needle's Eye in 1964. (An account here if anyone is interested... supertopo.com/tr/The-First-… ) No doubt that in many cases, the uncertainty involved in a ground-up ascent, both in where to go and whether there will be pro, is an obstacle that can be on a par with the cruxes. |
|
|
Ahhh! The Rich Goldstone of the ‘64 Needles Eye 5.8x route— it is an honor,sir ! Never did that one too scary for me though I climbed a lot of the other stuff right. Was randomly around two climbing fatalities in the Park, which scared me over to Rushmore. Found my Black Hills climbing home there. Don’t know if you have kept up with that scene, but there are a some younger guys there carrying on your bold tradition of dangerous ground up climbing putting up 12+ to 13+ R trad climbs. |
|
|
Can't say I've kept up with the scene other than what appears in the Needle's section of MP. I'm certainly aware of a slew of new bold ground-up ascents and am, of course, suitably impressed (understanding that I've never climbed 5.13 and so can't truly appreciate how hard some of those new routes are). |
|
|
Jeffrey Constine wrote: yea working it from the ground up leading taking whippers is better. (It's not a send on TR). So sir, here's my question: would you climb with someone like myself, who can't "claim" anything at all, by the parameters you have laid out? Except that I regularly rope up and take my best shot at whatever I can vaguely attempt at that moment? No snark intended or implied. That's one of the useful parts of grades though, getting a bit of a feel for a potential partners abilities. I'm actually in the "adventure" climb category in spirit, I just am not able to chase that without risking too much healthwise. Broken bones at this point could cost my mobility. |
|
|
Chris Hirsch, in particular, has put up some almost incomprehensible trad routes. He also finished some of The late great Todd Skinner’s unsent sport projects at Rushmore such as Atomic Slap which sat there for like twenty years unsent. Probably the best climber that most people have never heard of... |
|
|
Nivel Egres wrote: Ah. Now I see it! Thank you. |
|
|
Jeffrey Constine wrote: Carl, Top roping a route into submission then leading it, the rating no longer applies. normally the rating is for the on-sight, that's it. I do not agree. If I didn't trad lead a grade 21, what grade did I lead? Of course it's still a grade 21. Of course I know that onsighting a climb is more difficult that attempting it over time and then doing it cleanly. Of course I know top roping a climb is easier than leading it and that even doing a sports climb is easier than trading it. Of course I know doing it hundreds of times on top rope and then leading it is easier. Of course I know I'm not a 'grade 21 tradder' My hardest trad onsight so far is a grade 15, that's the grade I think I'm 'at'. I never claimed an onsight. For me, this was a significant send because: |
|
|
Old lady H wrote: ...YAY CARL!!! Happy you decided it was time, and you got your project! Truly awesome! Hey, on your YouTube link? I believe if you merely edit in an "enter" key (the one that moves you to a new line), you'll have a clickable link... Thanks Helen. Edited the link. |
|
|
Eavesdropping on this conversation between lifelong climbers. Sat mesmerized, rgold, at the climb on the link you shared. It’s a work of art. Some of us may never get off a top rope, but I appreciate how gracious you all have been to new members to the climbing community. Perhaps there is some kind of trail map I could overlay? And then, within MP I see no description of climbing routes on this mountain. (Considering that possibility that I'd get there and all it would be is a slab... but other climbers with ropes are cutting through the property to get back there. I'm assuming there's something to climb.) This is all new but an enjoyable challenge. I didn’t consider navigating to be part of climbing but apparently it is. After the scare with my daughter perhaps it’s my way of feeling more capable when out exploring. So be it. |
|
|
Indeed looks like a tough and very cool climb! |
|
|
Forget buzzard's roost. Here's your spot. The hole in the ground trail looks like it goes by some good slab..... |
|
|
Or here, right by the lake. There's a ton (see what I did there) of rock all around that place. Unmarked trails are pretty obvious on the Google maps. |
|
|
Once I do a route I never forget the moves till dead, call it whatever grade you like! once worked, 5.12's feel like 5.9 after dialing it in, at least some of them do hmm maybe 10 or 11? |
|
|
Lori Milas wrote: Eavesdropping on this conversation between lifelong climbers. Sat mesmerized, rgold, at the climb on the link you shared. It’s a work of art. Some of us may never get off a top rope, but I appreciate how gracious you all have been to new members to the climbing community. Lori a great aid to navigation we used to use in the army was a 'navigation data sheet'. This basically described the route we would take split in to little bite sized logical chunks. In a table form, you would indicate the compass bearing and distance, and any natural (not man made as they change) features that the map indicated you might look for. You might write "1.3Km on a bearing of 183 degrees. Ground slopes upwards to my right. At 750 metres cross a small stream. After another 200 metres ground slopes downwards, with a rocky outcrop to the left". That way you can check the features off as you come across them. 'Aiming off' is another great skill. You might actually choose to NOT hit your target, but 'aim off' a few degrees to the L or R to that you hit a track or stream and then follow that to your target. So for instance on your map if you were navigating cross country from Lower Lola to the orange dot, you might aim off to the right so you hit the track and then follow the track left to the orange dot. If you aimed straight for the dot and missed it, you might not know if you're actually left of it or right of it... |









