People not giving a F$%k about wet rock. Wall Street, Moab
|
|
Mark Vigilwrote: Because the routes are fun? And it's more than 6". Hyperbole much? |
|
|
grug gwrote: Yeah, involve the land manager and get actual regulations on things that are important. |
|
|
I don’t think the land managers give a shit about Wall Street. In fact I think they would like an opportunity to shut it down due to all the people wandering around the highway and dogs getting killed etc. People climbing on wet rock is the least of their concerns. On the bright side, you can go down there once every four or five years and make it feel like an on site because the routes change so much. |
|
|
grug gwrote: Try to think about it as the routes “evolving” instead of just “broken”. Everyone likes a new project! |
|
|
In my experience it's been about 1/2 the people don't know it's wrong and 1/2 know and don't care. A simple question like, Do you know what can happen when you climb on wet sandstone? Is all you need to start with. For the 1/2 that say, No, I don't. Say, The wet rock is really weak and you can break off holds and make the route harder. For the 1/2 that say, Yes. Say, Okay, I just wanted to make sure you knew you could break holds off and change the route. IMO it's not worth getting in an argument that won't change anything. But I also want to say something because I'd regret it if I didn't. 1/2 the time the people may be appreciative and you could save a climb. But dicks will be dicks and you just let that go. |
|
|
I've come to accept the flypaper theory of outdoor recreation these days. A handful of climbs/hikes/peaks suck up the majority of people. They are generally very nice climbs/hikes/peaks and it undoubtedly sucks both due to crowding as well as damage but it leaves everything else more sparsely populated than it otherwise would be. In the PNW the Colchuck Lake/Enchantment-through-hike seems to be the destination for 90% of the instagram-hikers & cosplay-trailrunner crowd. Its a bummer for sure but so many other, even nearby places, still offer relative solitude. The same must exist in the Moab area? |
|
|
The entire Moab area is the sacrifice zone for the rest of the desert now. Everywhere within an hour of that blighted place is a shitshow. |
|
|
P Bwrote: No its not. If you’re having a hard time making the decision not to climb then you’re not ethical. |
|
|
Chad Millerwrote: It must be tough being perfect |
|
|
I don't think we have to be apathetic about this. Wall Street is an absolute treasure and should be protected. It shouldn't be to hard to get some signs erected. What climbers coalition covers the area? I'm sure people would donate a few bucks to get some signs. |
|
|
P Bwrote: Nobody's perfect. In your case you have larger things to worry about. If you know what your doing is unethical, selfish, and harmful but you still do it because you had to drive from Boulder to Moab and want to climb then you're not a good person. |
|
|
Adam blocwrote: There's some genuinely good sport multis on Lake Mead Buttress now, but they're only there literally because visitors and locals alike *needed* a place to go when the sandstone was wet. |
|
|
P B wrote: Ah! I though you were climbing on wet sandstone in Moab knowing the damage it could cause. |
|
|
Chad Millerwrote: Never! Just discussing the weakness of ethical decision making against invested time. |
|
|
I like climbing on wet sandstone because the holds start to conform to my fingers better. Which reminds me of where the real climbing is at: in the gym. |
|
|
R K wrote: |
|
|
Chad Millerwrote: This. It's not even like the limestone options around are bad either! Note: I understand this thread is about Moab, but having plan B, C and D is like climbing planning 101. |
|
|
Andrew Gramwrote: I've been hearing this from old friends who are in UT, one had a place there and ended up taking the money and running. Of course everything between Spanish Fork and N Ogden is pretty similar as far as unchecked sprawl and motor vehicle worship too. |
|
|
I'm not joking - how do we get some signs on Wall Street? |
|
|
grug gwrote: |





