Techtopia Gym Surveillance Technology is Here. Plus Inclusivity!
|
|
I allow location tracking for about 3 of 4 apps and only when I am using those apps. I do not download loyalty apps at all. I know google tracks me because I use their maps, so eyes sort of open on that one. This said, techtopia has nothing to do with climbing and so has nothing to do with me. But I am no longer surprised by youth's willingness to surrender their privacy for some tiny, minor perceived convenience. |
|
|
Marc801 Cwrote: Yes i recognize the irony of my posting “fuck big data” from my smart phone. |
|
|
Cherokee Nuneswrote: As but one example, this very site uses 6 tracking cookies: 5 from Google and 1 from Doubleclick. Edit to add: actually more than 6 - I missed how to use a specific feature in a tracker visualizer I have. Here's the full list: |
|
|
Again, I don't think many people think this particular application (climbing gym metrics) is a big deal BY ITSELF. However the mindset behind it is spreading everywhere, and IMO that is a big deal. Since most of us are familiar with gym climbing, it's easy for us to see how little thought went into how this tracking software is supposed to benefit the customer - the climbing gyms. Which makes it easy to understand that the priorities of the people pushing this lie elsewhere. Now apply it to every business you interact, your job, your PC and phone (duh), your goddam refrigerator, etc etc. People who earnestly develop products worth buying start with a problem that needs solving, and come up with a solution. Which is the complete opposite of what is happening here and many other places. |
|
|
are they going to be able to see if I dab another route at the top of the proj? |
|
|
Cocoapuffs 1000wrote: Humor me here. To further discourage thread drift lets limit the scope to what the system is supposed to accomplish right now, per article, and manufacturer's website. Climbing wall designer/manufacturer/operator noticed that people not clipping into autobelays is a problem despite warnings signs, staff, etc. How is this not a solution for a problem. |
|
|
Will C wrote: Wonder what your take on seat belts is? Should we assume everyone knows how to drive and therefore its dumb to wear them? With all things you have to assume some level of incompetence. In this situation there is a simpler solution that doesn't require cameras. |
|
|
Aaron Cliftonwrote: The irony is it's usually expert complacency that leads to these accidents, not someone being a newb. |
|
|
Not surprising, in the least. I do not browse this site from mobile. I do not use this site's phone app. I do not share my laptop's location unless I specifically allow it, for example, for travel booking software, and then I opt for 1-time share whenever possible. It's mainly a pet peeve of mine - I don't like sharing my location with anyone unless they need to know, and even then I grit my teeth. |
|
|
Will C wrote: That’s a great example! You never have mis started your car ever? Your entire life you have never tried to start it without your foot entirely on the brake? You never accidentally realized you couldn’t move because your parking brake was on? There are even features in a car to prevent you from starting it in gear! While 99.9% of the time I start my car fine, every few years I think I started my car but my foot wasn’t all the way on the brake. Or I forgot to take the parking brake off for about 1 second. The difference is I just try again then drive off. In this climbing situation you die. |
|
|
amariuswrote: Just to be clear: "to monitor that people climbing on autobelays do not forget to clip in" is absolutely not the only thing this is going to be used for. Surveillance technology is always sold with some purpose that we can all agree is good, but rarely ends up there. It starts with "we need to monitor everyone's text messages to catch child pornographers and terrorists!" but what it actually is used for is arresting people selling weed and cops stalking their exes. |
|
|
Marc801 Cwrote: Okay, but if I had any choice in that, I wouldn't. My clients need me to be accessible by email a lot of the time, and if I don't have clients, I don't get to eat. I could work another job, but any job you can find is going to involve compromising on something I value. The fact is, modern capitalism has made it literally impossible to survive while staying true to my values. A choice between being surveilled, and not having a phone is not a free choice, and it's not a choice we should be forced to make. Capitalism's version of "freedom" is "you can do whatever you want, as long as you don't mind that you don't get to eat or sleep in shelter" and then calling people hypocrites because they do things they don't believe in, in order to eat and stay housed. Just because someone's a hypocrite, doesn't mean they're wrong.
Yes.
OSM and Gunks App, and they only have access when I'm using them.
No, because cookies and Javascript are disabled on my browser.
No.
Yes, I'm absolutely not going to a gym that won't respect my privacy. I can't do my job without a phone. Not going to a gym is a sacrifice, but it's not a sacrifice I can't make. |
|
|
They sure are getting creative in the ways they shoehorn "inclusivity" into stuff. |
|
|
Mike D wrote: Can't resist: |
|
|
Will C wrote: I was gonna let this one lie but I really can't get past this logic. If you are climbing with gear and a rock breaks is that your fault? What if you are bouldering and a rock breaks and you crush your leg like that one guy did. Should you not check your partners knot, since that is their responsibility? Seems like there is a spectrum of behaviors that the total responsibility on the individual varies. But going back to the car example because that is the example you gave. Should the neutral safety switch be removed from all cars? Should your car remove all user error safety features?
So kids and new climbers, should never go climbing? What did you think about the multipitch trad thread where the follower didn't unclip? Is that the followers fault since they went climbing? I think in some situations responsibility varies, maybe give the climber 95% of the responsibility for the auto belay and give the gym 5%, in this situation it seems like a no brainer for the gym to try to protect you from yourself at least a little bit (auto belays have those tarps now). Gyms pad the floors, fix the ropes, some include belay devices, and many other user error features. However I think it is unreasonable for the gym to spend 10k to protect you from yourself. |
|
|
What about the nice ass algorithm? I mean, it can be taught "Nice Ass" and "Not Nice Ass" right? It could even send a text to the gym staff, alerting of them of a Code 9 on the Pink Route? |
|
|
David Kwrote: You realize that your phone always knows where you are thanks to both GPS and cell tower location triangulation? Do you ever use Google or Apple maps for navigation while driving?
Frankly, I don't believe you. How do you manage to use the web? That would break most sites - at least some features. I can't think of an ecommerce site that would work without JS. Without JS it's impossible to view or order anything on Amazon. Even here, turning off JS prevents you from accessing Your Page, Account Settings, and Log out when you click on your image in the upper right corner. Doing so also stops the picture gallery on the home page, hides all the photos on a route page, and makes posting nearly impossible. On MP even the Cancel link is a line of Javascript.
It's mid 2022. Are there really any businesses that don't have cameras at this point? |
|
|
Princess Puppy Lovrwrote: Not all cars require the foot on the brake when starting. Jeep Wranglers are a prime example. |
|
|
Will C wrote: Does posting this make you feel superior? |
|
|
Marc801 Cwrote: Yes. Did you even read my whole post, or did you just ignore the parts you don't have a glib response to?
No. OSM handles that, and while I don't completely trust them to value my privacy, I trust them a whole lot more than Google or Apple.
That's your prerogative, but I don't really know why you're skeptical that someone might have values and try to live by them. I'm certainly not the most hardcore person in this aspect, either.
It does break a lot of sites--which is why I don't use a lot of sites. I selectively enable some features on my desktop browser, but that requires knowing how to read code. I pretty much don't use the internet on my phone.
While I'd like to say I don't use Amazon because they are a sociopathic company, the reality is I don't use Amazon because they don't deliver to my van.
I've enabled most of the features that make the forum work. I didn't know there was a picture gallery on the home page. The guidebook aspects of the site I usually use on my phone, in the app, which probably has all sorts of tracking, but if you read my previous post in its entirety instead of cherry picking, you'd understand why.
Yes, lots of local establishments don't have cameras--this is one of the nice things about shopping local. But even the ones that do have cameras, aren't as likely to be networked. I'm not too worried about being filmed in a public place, if it's just local people doing it--it's something entirely different if it's being uploaded to the cloud, pervasively, and then sold to Clearview and a bunch of 3-letter government agencies. Though, ff some company like Ring starts selling their stuff to businesses on a large scale, I'm not sure I can do anything reasonable about it. |





