Who owns the route?
|
There is a climbing area in northern Vermont, where almost all of routes were drilled by hand on the lead. Consequently, there are many badly protected routes and very few bolts. Originally all of the anchors were on trees, many of which died. Because their lower limbs had been cut off and their roots had been trampled. Eventually, the developer realized that bolted anchors would be a good thing. A number of people were injured and some took ground Falls, and on some of those routes, the developer realized that an additional bolt or two were necessary and have been added. There are still plenty of runout scary, climbs there, but some of the better climbs that were more dangerous have been made marginally safer. |
|
june mwrote: June, Wheeler? |
|
If you lower or rap down in order to bolt it before the FA, you aren't making any sort of achievement with regards to climbing. You are making an installation. A vertical trail. Unless it is on your property, you're doing it on something you do not own. Therefore, your work is subject to critique and alteration. If the route is established from the ground up, we apply a degree of achievement to it. The route therefore does hold a degree of preservation worthiness. As a sort of historical artifact. Installation or history. Both are worthy. Anarchy isn't a destructive force, either. It is by definition simply "without rulers". We all want to live the best we can under anarchy because it means we aren't being dictated to as to how to live our lives and go about our business. That doesn't mean without rules. Rules are vital to peace. When we as a like-minded collection of humans with the same passion, in this case climbing rocks, all self-police and regulate our actions without involving an authority we are engaging in anarchy. It is the act of freedom. Whenever you see an appeal to authority (what do the land managers think?) you are interacting with a person who is afraid of freedom. |
|
june mwrote: This. |
|
X Foliatorwrote: While this sounds great in theory, the cold reality is that the 'land managers' often do actually own the land, or have the legal authority to 'manage' it. In that capacity, they often impose and enforce various rules and regulations concerning the use of said land. We may not agree with some or all of those rules, but many, in fact, are based upon valid concerns about use of those spaces/resources (public or private) which are limited, fragile, and often shared by many different interests. While I don't think ( in most situations) that it is appropriate for climbers to actively 'involve' the managers in our disputes, in many, probably most, such situations they will become aware anyway, and take the actions that they feel to be appropriate---and are legally authorized to do. Like it or not, 'anarchy' does not 'rule'. |
|
Jason4Toowrote: You bring up a valid point. I would say the debate is young and immature to an extent but that is only because there is a change of respect per se to the FA party. Seneca is where i learned to trad climb and there is a staunch ethic out there as far as bolts, grades etc. There are 5.12x rated routes out there that sure you could put a bolt on to protect but the section that is x rated is 5.10ish. If you are trying a 5.12 trad route then climbing a runout 5.10 section should be very manageable. I do feel like the gym culture and where people learn to climb influences mindset as well. Bouldering comes to mind but that is for another thread... Bottom line is in any sport that is largely self regulated there will be those that err on the side of caution and those that err on the side of calculated risk and everything in between. Go have fun, do what you can and feel safe doing and call it a day. |
|
Jon Hartmannwrote: I gotta say, as someone who appreciates bold climbing, lives in CO, and has absolutely no stake in this climb whatsoever, after reading all the comments it does seem pretty dumb there's not a bolt at the location in question on this climb. Usually on the other side of the argument here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
Alan Rubinwrote: Where did the 'Legal Authority' to own and manage the land come from? I don't remember signing any consent form. Do you? Anarchy isn't a system. It can't 'rule'. It's an individual approach. It exists in degrees in our lives, as does Authoritarianism. |
|
I get it. It might be dumb but the FA didn’t put one in and there is the MOST textbook cam placement exactly where the bolt would go. It might not be a “sport” climb but no one has to climb it. One could walk right past it and climb something else. But yeah….it’s dumb. |
|
It's me, I own the routes. DM me if you have questions |
|
X Foliatorwrote: In your non-internet, non-anonymous real life you undoubtedly know---and live--the answer to your question. |
|
Alan Rubinwrote: Are you talking about the moment when you are born, in the nurse holds you upside down and before cutting the umbilical cord slaps you on the ass until you consent to be governed? |
|
for the most part if I put the route up I retain control over it until I cede that control. If you want to change it ask me. If I think the change is nessicary I will most likly do it myself. That completely changes at areas that get popular enough to have an organized comitee that manages the area. Once that happens all decisions are made by the commity that puts the effort into securing access, maintaining routes and trails etc. Crag VT for example actually bought Bolton securing access and parking. They should be able to make any changes to a route that they deem nessicary to best fulfil their mission. . More loosly managed areas it should still be the FA parties choice as to what modifications if any are done to a route. |
|
God dammit! Doesn’t anyone read the threads? The question has been answered up thread. Bolting Karen owns all of the routes. End of thread. |
|
Frank Steinwrote: Incorrect. If you pee on the rock you control all routes below said stream. Highest pee wins. |
|
Chad Millerwrote: what about those blessed with a wide stream - marking the whole face. |
|
PWZwrote: Oh it’s not just below the wet spot. From the pee, establish an elevation line around the entire peak. Everything below is now owned person doing the marking. |
|
Chad Millerwrote: So, it’s Ken Nichols then? This is so confusing… |
|
Chad Millerwrote: What if I pee from the top of the route? |
|
If I put in the effort to clean a route and equip it with several hundred dollars worth of hardware you damn right that I have first say on how that route is managed. If that route is in an area that is managed by a climbing coalition then that coalition has final say. |