"Redacted" non-redacted climbs

I noticed a lot of climbs now have "redacted" tooltips even though they aren't redacted.

https://www.mountainproject.com/route/105735851/wet-dreams
https://www.mountainproject.com/route/105735479/hot-tuna
https://www.mountainproject.com/route/109028964/big-tuna
https://www.mountainproject.com/route/105736238/moby-dick
https://www.mountainproject.com/route/105735098/sex-porpoises

They seem to range from PG innuendo to complete false positives:
https://www.mountainproject.com/route/106999932/upper-black-dyke

hold on -are you trying to import the trump doctrine ?

wake and bake wrote:

hold on -are you trying to import the trump doctrine ?

Make MP great again?

MP definitely summited Mt. Idiocy on that whole route shaming thing.

Austin Donisan wrote:

I noticed a lot of climbs now have "redacted" tooltips even though they aren't redacted.

Yes, a woke conspiracy, for sure, better get on the horn with DOGE

Or, perhaps, this happened -

someone flagged a particular route name
automatic system changed the name to 'redacted', and created tooltip
an adult took a look at the name, and reverted
but the tooltip remains

Anyways, birds are not real

Hey Austin, yes, that's a work in progress. Those infotips are now showing on any names that have ever been flagged. I got ahead of myself a bit by asking for that change before updating the associated copy and landing page, sorry for the confusion. 

Bigger picture, this is in response to feedback asking for greater transparency around names on MP. The goal is to make it easier to learn more, understand the context around any changes, and see the original name if it's been removed or revised.

As you can tell from the examples you posted, the range of names that get flagged by users is massive. Let me know if you have any questions, I'll see if I can get that improved soon.

Thanks for confirming. That also explains why identically named routes at other crags don't have the tooltip.