Rocky Talkies Etiquette
|
|
What about gym use? There are always a handful of people that feel the need to shout "ready to lower!", "lowering!". Maybe they could use rocky talkies with a headset to relieve the strain on my ears. |
|
|
Jasonwrote: With you on this. BT has terrible range, even v. 5.1. It says max range 800 meters. In real terms I bet it's a lot less. On the other hand, I've spoken to my friend on the summit of Mt. Whitney while I was down by the E-ledges, several miles away, using a normal Motorola walkie. |
|
|
Jasonwrote: Yeah, agree. BT wasn't designed for long distance usage. It's designed to create very local connections between devices. |
|
|
Andrew Ricewrote: I suspect that the motorcycle radio is a regular walkie-talkie. It uses BT to connect your phone, MP3 and GPS to the main unit and communicates between units via radio. BT5.x absolutely does not go to 800 meters.... not even feet. |
|
|
Alex Fletcherwrote: part of basic radio planning on public use frequencies should always include a bump plan. e.g. we plan on using channel A with privacy code Y. you get there and 3 other parties are on same channel. "Hey bro channel bump!" - bro clicks radio to channel C rinse and repeat as needed |
|
|
apogeewrote: I drive 80mph on my moto with my ear buds in. I think a whip won't matter |
|
|
B Ywrote: Never saw someone using talkies in the climbing gym. And I am there 3 days a week. |
|
|
Ryan Enright wrote: I really have no idea what you mean. Why can’t they be both a useful tool and a convenient way to communicate? It’s 100% better if the party near me is using radios to communicate that one of them is off route than trying to yell at each other. It doesn’t degrade the safety in any way if partners have discussions over radios. Some of us climb for fun; pointing out the cool mountain goats can be part of that. |
|
|
How many rope tugs is "I see mountain goats in the distance"? |
|
|
Threadsurrection |
|
|
Dan Nguyenwrote: Here are a few thoughts on using radios in climbing scenarios: a) Radios should be used to enhance communication — not replace fundamental climbing commands and systems. It's important to build reliable, non-radio communication skills first. b) More listening, less talking. Keep transmissions brief and to the point. This helps your climbing partner, minimizes unnecessary chatter on the shared channel, and is respectful to others who may be nearby and not interested in hearing your running commentary. c) Focus on fixing the basic issues that often lead to yelling at the crag, and develop the awareness to reduce the need for unnecessary communication — radio or otherwise. For example, yelling “How much rope is left?” is common, but learning to build systems or habits that track rope use more effectively can minimize the need for mid-pitch radio checks. d) Be aware of local emergency-designated FRS/GMRS channels and avoid using them for casual communication. This is better known in the backcountry skiing world, but it’s worth carrying that awareness into climbing contexts too. I use radios extensively in the backcountry skiing world, so I definitely recognize their value. That said, I personally try to avoid using them in rock climbing whenever possible. While radios can be a great tool for improving communication, I really appreciate the simplicity and flow of moving through rock terrain with a partner using minimal verbal exchange. I also believe that developing this kind of non-verbal communication is an important part of becoming a well-rounded rock climber — and in some cases, early reliance on radios may be bypassing that skill development altogether. |
|
|
Benoit Cerrinawrote: 3 days a week??! My medial tendinitis flared up just reading that! |
|
|
Dan Nguyenwrote: + week end outdoor if possible. The tendonitis point is well taken though ramping up climbing frequency has to be done carefully as muscle build up faster than tendons and ligaments. I didn't start at 3 days a week. There is also how long your sessions are and whether you work on endurance, technic or strength. Anyway I wish your elbow to get better |
|
|
Michael Abendwrote: That one in Colorado right? |
|
|
Smith Martin Paulwrote: Hard to hear your partner over the bands. |
|
|
The only thing more annoying than radios are falling radios. |
|
|
rgoldwrote: In my experience there is only an over-concentration on channel 69. Not an inter-party ettiquite issue, but imo both partners need to understand that by default, a response to a transmission is not required. Follower should not be expected to transmit "You're off belay" or "climbing" if they have other tasks to do that are blocking the team from making progress. |
|
|
I just insist they use their "handles" so we know who is who on the channel. "Love Handles to Sweet Lips, over? "Copy that Love Handles, what you need, over?" "Mo' sugar (our code for tension!) Sweet Lips, over?" Like that. |
|
|
Devan Beewrote: .. / ... . . / -- --- ..- -. - .- .. -. / --. --- .- - ... / .. -. / - .... . / -.. .. ... - .- -. -.-. . |
|
|
This is why I will only climb with other people who wear Starlink mini antennas on their helmets like me. Satellites or bust! |




