Escalante - Cabin Wall closed to climbing
|
DWF 3 wrote: You should see it. Looks a lot like Vedawoo without all the damage from roads, climbers, campers.....people. Beauty beyond imagination. Mountain lions, wild horses, beavers. Except for the occasional cow you see it looks exactly like it did 1000 years ago. Thank you for your completely baseless opinion tho. |
|
Grug M wrote: A pound of almonds takes 1900 gallons. Almost 10% of all the water in CA is used for almond production. Plus a myriad of horrible environmental practices. I agree though, cattle production is abusive but needs to be seen in perspective. |
|
Here’s the real question: How much water does it take to raise one pound of human? Because that is the problem. |
|
Grug M wrote: Depends on the cattle and type of ranching. Factory ranching takes a lot more water than free range. It’s still a lot of water for free range beef though, around 850 gal per pound of meat For some comparisons: Lentils: 700 gal per pound Chicken: 500 gal per pound Soy: 250 gal per pound Corn: 120 gal per pound Taking a shower: 17 gal It’s common knowledge that beef production takes a lot of water. There are a lot more resource use, embodied energy, and environmental impact in food production than just water though. That’s what I was asking about . Oh, and I’m more of a Barton of the Western Slope who leads 9’s and one move 10’s. |
|
Grug M wrote: Well, I don't disagree with your opposition to that poster. He might be the greatest detractor to the forums these days. I digress. If b00gle (bogus google) is your source of "fact", I find your "opinion" quite suspect. Is that really your research, source and conclusion. This may be one major issue with our nation and world today. But, keep up your b00gle search for your fact "science". Your example from b00gle claims "it takes 1800 gallons of water to produce a single pound of beef". Well, where does the water come from and where did it go? Often from a nasty stream or pond, then they piss it back out into the water cycle. Clearly, there isn't 1800 gallons of water in one pound of beef. It comes and it goes. Another perspective, it's amazing the harsh, dry, sage brush land that cattle are able to graze on and create food for all. |
|
Greg D wrote: Sorry I’ve upset you so. I am curious how I’m the greatest detractor from this site though. I’m not intending to upset people (except for the trolls). |
|
Bill Schick wrote: Actually I was asking a serious question about the ecological impact of ranching in areas like this. I’ve been through several free range ranches in the high desert and was rather curious how much additional resources needed to be brought in / diverted. |
|
Climbed there in the '80s and put up a few routes on that wall. Came back a couple of years later to find that deer hunters had tried to shoot the rap anchors down. I counted 76 impact points and removed the drilled angle with 2 fingers! This was the handiwork of rednecks, part of the same culture that graze cows. Way fucked up without even a single gallon of water. Man always kills the thing he loves. POSTSCRIPT: Hmmmph, forgot that I already posted here. Senile I guess,.. |
|
Chad Miller wrote: I mean, I don't think it takes a lot of experience to see the environmental implications of 94+ million, several thousand pound, hooved, invasive, animals. But I could mention Dad's a rancher. And I've never actually been somewhere below tree line in the US a cow hasn't shit (no one has). Ever drink water straight from a water source below tree line? Why not? Don't get me wrong, I'm not some militant vegan, I enjoy beef weekly, but we should probably quit making cows. |
|
DWF 3 wrote: Thanks for the info. You should look at the North Shore of MN, specifically he Sawtooth Mountains. They’re right on Lake Superior and about 400’ higher than the inland topo. No cows have ever been grazed there and it’s well below the tree line. |
|
Ron O wrote: Was this “redneck justus” that thing was all pockmarked. And good. |
|
Jack Crackerson wrote: Let's not paint with too broad a brush. |
|
...I have been looking for a good excuse to boycott beef. Thanks ranchers....... |
|
Almonds take more water per pound than beef. Hopefully you don't support that. Really, this is the reason you want to boycott beef for? |
|
...already boycotted them too, along with quinoa. This boycott is not about water , |
|
I’m gonna boycott golf. Green grass everywhere!! Fucking water hogs. |
|
Greg D wrote: Quit playing golf for that exact reason. Water shortage in Ca, fucking golf courses in the desert? |
|
DWF 3 wrote: Some of you guys are part of the problem. Running cattle has been around forever, long before climbing. And spouting off on water and cattle issues have nothing to do with the topic. |
|
Sarah Z wrote: You may want to look up the word "boycott". |
|
In case you didn't hear, Escalante - Cabin Wall closed to climbing. I almost forgot what this thread was about. Nice job! It's closed because climbers were annoying the people that owned the land. Sad but fair. Hopefully the WCCC can sort something out. |