Updated Colorado Safer at Home Order - 10-mile limit for recreation
|
|
Martin le Roux wrote: The actual public health order was published earlier today (April 27). See drive.google.com/file/d/1l1…. The 10-mile limit isn't as strict as the Governor's April 26 executive order implied it would be. It's a somewhat vague recommendation, not a hard-and-fast rule. The public health order says: "Travel for recreational purposes should be [NB not "must be"] limited to your own community like your county of residence or traveling no more than about 10 miles". Thanks for posting this. It’s confusing when the executive order reads differently than the health department order - this does seem to allow greater flexibility. It would be great if people would demonstrate some common sense and stop congregating in large groups and overcrowding parks (and crags). |
|
|
ErikaNW wrote: The new order states we are not allowed to recreate more than 10 miles from our place of residence and must limit travel to within our county of residence or employment. So what I want to know is if I have to drive home from work to go for a jog over my lunch break? |
|
|
Bill Schick wrote: Dude, I'm not in Colorado, and I'm not driving to climb anywhere. But could you maybe clarify the crystal-clear law for me: Did they mean 10 miles radius, "as the crow flies", or did they mean 10-mile distance as measured by odometer? if I have to drive 6 miles straight, turn right, and drive 8 more miles, am I still Ok? The direct distance would be 10 miles at that point, but my odometer would say 14... |
|
|
reboot wrote: You're assuming that people will apply logic and reason... It reminds me of a sign I saw in the Wind Rivers that said "no camping within 100' of lakes and trails". I pointed out to my climbing partner that since it said "and" and not "or", it would be okay to camp next to a lake so long we weren't also next to a trail. He wasn't convinced. We spent the rest of the trip debating that point. |
|
|
Kevin DeWeese wrote: We don’t have rights, we have privileges. They’re not rights if they can be taken away. |
|
|
PNW Choss wrote: Welcome to Soviet Colorado comrades. Isn't "democracy" fucking great. If this comment gets banned for "Violating guideline #1" it will only prove your point even more. |
|
|
Lena chita wrote: You mean explain something to a narc? Lol. |
|
|
Now the state is suggesting all businesses check a client's or employees temperature before entering the establishment. Why didn't this start a month ago? None of the essential businesses have been doing this and some just made masks mandatory for employees. Until two days ago only half our local grocery store workers were wearing masks. Grocery stores! FFS! Less in Wal-Mart. |
|
|
In the safer at home order linked by the OP, I see no mention of a 10 mile rule or staying in your county of residence. |
|
|
Rich Ludwig wrote: In the safer at home order linked by the OP, I see no mention of a 10 mile rule or staying in your county of residence. Well, I got it from the document (page 3, section H.2.ii) sorry I can’t copy and past the text here since I’m not at my computer. As someone else mentioned, the Colorado Health Department seems to have phrased it more leniently than the Executive Order. The document was linked in a news article published in the Colorado Sun. So, I guess that answers your question of where I got this stuff from. |
|
|
Glad I don't live in Colorado |
|
|
I thought I read somewhere that you could recreate anywhere in your county + 3 miles. I'll try to find that. |
|
|
Trevor Taylor wrote: Glad I don't live in Colorado Colorado probability agrees with you. |
|
|
Prohibiting camping seems somewhat unenforceable on large swaths of BLM land. From what I've seen in western CO, most non-locals are flocking this way to get a break from the insanity of the Front Range, which makes sense. If this order was enforced to all of CO, we'd be seeing a lot of tickets. |
|
|
curt86iroc wrote: I keep hearing this, but no one has been able to tell me what the actual citation is for. I think it's a rumor. Maybe being on a closed road? Idk, I've heard a lot of people climbing clear creek crags that are packed and none of them have gotten. |
|
|
Thanks Chalk User! That helps clarify. It’s confusing when the governor writes en executive order that states the health department must include certain restrictions (and that gets press), then the actual health department order is different. Regardless, as you pointed out, the intention is the same. |
|
|
Does the language in the Executive Order take precedent over the CDPHE order? I wish they would have consistent messaging. |
|
|
Jack Markovich wrote: its not. i watched them do it... |
|
|
curt86iroc wrote: Still doesn't answer my question of what the citation is for. You saw officers writing tickets and putting them on people's car? So whoever the car is registered to gets a citation for violating a public health order? |
|
|
Jack Markovich wrote: yup... if you want more details, call the county and ask. |




