Mountain Project Logo

Is your masculinity in climbing toxic?

mediocre · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jul 2013 · Points: 0
Pepe Climbs Rocks wrote:

Been busy separating children from their parents and putting kids in cages.

Thanks for making America great again. 

Li Vello Ro · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2018 · Points: 0

https://livellozero.net/en/coryphene-calanques-trad-climbing-flirt-did-not-survive-ground-fall/

Old lady H · · Boise, ID · Joined Aug 2015 · Points: 1,375
Li Vello Ro wrote: livellozero.net/en/coryphen…

Great story, well worth the read! 

Best, OLH

jason oliphant · · warren, Pa · Joined Mar 2018 · Points: 20

crazy how she felt so guilty for that.  if she was at belay but there was nothing she could do...... (she couldn't step back to pick up slack)
now help me understand something.  if you have an injury and are in pain- why would you continue to climb?

its it because the of the expense of getting to the calaniques, perhaps a gesture to his partner that wasn't hurt, etc? or.... is it more a refusal to admit defeat?
some might see the latter as toxic masculinity.  but I don't see it as either toxic or in gender terms at all.

I routinely push myself to do things; and so long as I'm not putting myself (or someone else) in danger; its not toxic.
---
also,
am I just getting us right back into this obviously toxic topic?
:( prolly

mediocre · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jul 2013 · Points: 0
jason oliphant wrote: crazy how she felt so guilty for that.  if she was at belay but there was nothing she could do...... (she couldn't step back to pick up slack)
now help me understand something.  if you have an injury and are in pain- why would you continue to climb?

its it because the of the expense of getting to the calaniques, perhaps a gesture to his partner that wasn't hurt, etc? or.... is it more a refusal to admit defeat?
some might see the latter as toxic masculinity.  but I don't see it as either toxic or in gender terms at all.

I routinely push myself to do things; and so long as I'm not putting myself (or someone else) in danger; its not toxic.
---
also,
am I just getting us right back into this obviously toxic topic?
:( prolly

Look Jason, at this point of the thread there is no room for serious responses. 

Let’s keep talking about children in cages. 
Jon Frisby · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Feb 2013 · Points: 280
John RB wrote: The recent training video by Jstar, Tommy and Alex reminded me of this thread... Jonathan says Alex "crimps like a kitten."  Tommy says Jonathan has no upper arm strength and can't climb roofs.  No way would women do a video like this... they would all say positive and empowering things to support each other.

I don't think it's linked to testosterone... it's just a cultural norm we've established.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=618eR-1zdoY

The filmmaker is Tara Kerzhner, who also made Slaydies

jason oliphant · · warren, Pa · Joined Mar 2018 · Points: 20
mediocre wrote:

Look Jason, at this point of the thread there is no room for serious responses. 

Let’s keep talking about children in cages. 

I know,I feel terrible about it.

some alpha man I turned out to be
:(

Slartibartfast · · New York · Joined Jun 2013 · Points: 0
jason oliphant wrote:

OMG.  Your trying HARD to troll us chemists, aren't you?


Just sayin' you've written an incredibly incorrect statement about pH.   for starters, technically, 6.7 is slightly acidic- not caustic.

I mean, if it's corrosive, it's caustic. Sorry if chemists are a bit tighter with their vocabulary. I don't want to offend, it's just this darn toxic masculinity of mine.

Slartibartfast · · New York · Joined Jun 2013 · Points: 0
ViperScale . wrote: 7 is the middle of the scale so anything below 7 gets higher acidic and anything over 7 get higher caustic (basic) but generally it would have to be really high / low on the scale to be considered really dangerous 1/2, 13/14.

Hmm, so you're saying that 6.7 isn't perfectly balanced but won't actually hurt you unless you're trying to be hurt? I feel like you are aaaalmost getting my original point.

cragmantoo · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Mar 2015 · Points: 175

AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!

All I have to say...

Forrest Halley · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2018 · Points: 0

This thread is like Secret: strong enough for a man, but pH balanced for a woman. 

jg fox · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2015 · Points: 5
City Dweller wrote: What happened to Pepe?

Damn you for resurrecting this thread.

FrankPS · · Atascadero, CA · Joined Nov 2009 · Points: 276
jg fox wrote:

Damn you for resurrecting this thread.

J Squared · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Nov 2017 · Points: 0
Chris Little · · Albuquerque N.M. · Joined Jul 2017 · Points: 0
Lena chita wrote:

Good job misinterpreting my post, and coming up with lots of questions based on that. I am not dividing people into specifically labeled groups, I am saying that these groups CURRENTLY exist and people are treated differently based on their perceived belonging in those groups. It would be wonderful if someone's perception of the group you belong to didn't affect how you are treated. But it would be disingenuious to pretend that we are living in that worlds right now.

The whole point of white privilege is that just LOOKING white is enough to give you that privilege. If your friend has white hair and blue eyes, he probably doesn't have to worry so much about a cop stopping him just for walking in a "white" neighborhood. So yes, in this case your Indian friend is enjoying the benefits of white privilege.

He may very well be an outspoken activist for racial equality, a wonderful person, etc. etc. When I say that he is " enjoying" the benefits of white privilege I do not mean that he is consciously taking advantage of it in any way. It simply means that when going for a walk in the evening he is not worried about his skin color as the reason he might be stopped and harassed. When he is driving, he is not getting pulled over any more frequently than any other white guy with the same driving habits as him. He doesn't need to DO anything in order to receive the benefit of looking like white.

If your mixed-race kid looks white, he is getting the same benefits as a white person from his looks. If he doesn't look white, he is getting the short end of the stick.

That's the point of privilege. It is not about who you ARE as a person, it is about the fact that just by virtue of looking white you get to skip some of the unpleasanties that a black person gets for no other reason than his skin color.

I knew a girl in Charlotte, N.C. She was going to nursing school full time, and didn't work. She lived in low income housing. The cops patrolled the area constantly (Was THAT racist?) They would see her blue eyes and red hair and pull her over and ask her if she was there to buy drugs. Constant harassement. Was it racist to pull her over because she didn't look like other people there, or was it racist (On the part of the cops) to assume that was a good neighborhood to buy drugs because the residents were black?

Max Supertramp · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Mar 2008 · Points: 95

I can only measure it if you put it in your mouth

Max Supertramp · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Mar 2008 · Points: 95

It's not weird if we're just looking for a yardstick.  This is science, now.  

Suburban Roadside · · Abovetraffic on Hudson · Joined Apr 2014 · Points: 2,419
Only 15 pages ?

 come on

Man Up!


Stand in solidarity with your Cis-ters  
whether female, male  or some cross of both or self-aligning with fuzzy toys
The "Its" among us deserve to have "Wok-safe" route names

We Can at least go 30 pages . . .
Anthony Ricci · · Broomfield, CO · Joined Feb 2016 · Points: 0
Pepe Climbs Rocks wrote:

Yep.  Masculinity is toxic.  Feminity is virtuous.  Except in 2017 gender and sex are no longer real things--just social constructs.  

So, which is it?  "Men=bad, women=good?"  OR  "gender/sex is not a thing--just something made up by TEH PATRIARCHY?"

Excuse me if I am unable to complete the mental gymnastics routine of contradictory and flawed logic that is required to subscribe to post-modern feminist bullshit.

You sir, are either an epic beta cuck or an epic troll.

You've clearly missed the core concept of what toxic masculinity is

Suburban Roadside · · Abovetraffic on Hudson · Joined Apr 2014 · Points: 2,419

Some of the blame has to be chalked up to gym culture. where Micro-aggressions, Leering people of all walks
can not control objectifying & Sexualizing interactions by flirtatious behavior
even when the un-wanted interactions lend themselves to normal activity

Also to blame is a culture where there are people who take their anti-depressants daily
claiming it is to help to feel less self-conscious, control social anxiety, "feel normal".
This "normal" is dependant on a daily dose that then gives them 'cover';
allowing them to think it is okay to walk around less than -covered-
Skipping around in skimpy clothes & wearing what once was considered underwear as their go-everywhere cloths.
I'm not a prude & not advocating that women wear Burkas. Men are just as guilty of wearing overtly "less is more" more often than not.
Wearing things that are Cute, small & tight,  clothing, Leggings, spandex sports tops & shorts are perfectly fine for almost everything.  
Where this becomes an issue is when this sort of new normal( that is perfectly acceptable for daily activities ) bumps into all-day climbing.
Add a celebratory beverage  after hard physical exercise when the drugs start to wear off, you have potentially created a toxic mix of Femininity

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

General Climbing
Post a Reply to "Is your masculinity in climbing toxic?"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community! It's FREE

Already have an account? Login to close this notice.