How will a Trump presidency affect climbers
|
|
R. Moran wrote:I demand a long form birth certificate. Clearly he is an Orange! I thought he was a GMO tangelo. |
|
|
Hobo Greg wrote:Everyone saying "no" obviously does not follow along in class. Republicans/conservatives have made dismantling public land a priority since before there was public land. And now that they control all three branches, what's to stop them? Wow great point, except for that one republican/conservative president who placed over 230 million acres of land under protection, established the National Forest Service, laid the groundwork for the National Parks service, and is quoted saying, |
|
|
calebmmallory wrote: Wow great point, except for that one republican/conservative president who placed over 230 million acres of land under protection, established the National Forest Service, laid the groundwork for the National Parks service, and is quoted saying, "We have become great because of the lavish use of our resources. But the time has come to inquire seriously what will happen when our forests are gone, when the coal, the iron, the oil, and the gas are exhausted, when the soils have still further impoverished and washed into the streams, polluting the rivers, denuding the fields and obstructing navigation." OOPS Seriously, your generalization is absurd. Also, maybe you should read this: newrepublic.com/minutes/128… Enjoy! Political parties commonly shift platforms, this apparently happened to the Republicans sometime between Teddy and gop.com/platform/americas-n… |
|
|
More than anything, I expect a bunch of people to at minimum eat a feast of crow over their behavior in general since about 2005 or so. Everyone who was working behind the scenes to try to get HRC elected, in 2008, 2012, and now 2016. |
|
|
His presidency will only affect women, Mexicans, muslims, gays, and African Americans who want to climb on the privately owned land that used to be national and state parks. |
|
|
Here is the way I see it. You now have a republican congress, republican executive, & largely republican supreme court. Privatization of public lands has long been part of the republican platform. Trump, no matter how he feels about privatizing public lands, does not really care much about policy, and as result will sign anything that the legislature will send before his desk. There will be no checks and balances. It is up to you to decide if this is of concern, or not. |
|
|
I am hoping I can get away without paying $412 per month for crappy insurance with a $5500 deductible. |
|
|
|
|
|
mine comes with gold plated wheels |
|
|
Our summer western road trip was a real eye opener. We are so privledged to be able to camp for free on public lands yet so many of the places that we used to camp were gated or had no camping signs. can't see how this election helps preserve our right to camp and climb.... |
|
|
Eric Carlos wrote:I am hoping I can get away without paying $412 per month for crappy insurance with a $5500 deductible. 2014 was $204 with a $5000 deductible, and 2015 was $298 with $5500. That is over $10k out of pocket before receiving any benefit for my forced health insurance. it's so bad people forgo the insurance altogether and just try to ride out the tax penalty. my er always goes full with underserved that have nothing, except of course 5+ chronic disease processes with acute problems that require help. |
|
|
Eric Carlos wrote:I am hoping I can get away without paying $412 per month for crappy insurance with a $5500 deductible. 2014 was $204 with a $5000 deductible, and 2015 was $298 with $5500. That is over $10k out of pocket before receiving any benefit for my forced health insurance. Even Obama has said that Obama care isn't perfect, but it's a starting point. Take a stroll through any hospital and 80% of people are there for conditions that can be treated/prevented but people have no PCP or access to healthcare. At the very least Obamacare ensured that. |
|
|
Number one threat to climbing/access would be increased oil and gas exploration and production on Federal lands, and I agree it'll happen in the new Republican government...I mean, the House, the Senate, 33 Governors, and the Trump Presidency, whew! But directional drilling and other modern techniques have proven that minimal impacts can be achieved with excellent economies of production. This means that it's worth it, given the centrality of domestic shale production to medium term economic growth AND geopolitics AND carbon reduction, vis a vis other fossil energy. We've seen these lowered emissions during the Obama years and it's not just the financial crisis and great recession: The shale revolution has played a part, and electric cars and solar are going to play a bigger and bigger part no matter what. |
|
|
All Hail Crag Chariot Man! |
|
|
Real problem is the medical cost. 2100$ for sitting in a waiting room for 4 hours than took the doctor 30 mins to stitch up a cut on my chin. |
|
|
Viperscale-the problem is that if you take to much insulin and accidentally kill yourself-your family will sue. insulin is much easier to kill your self with versus OTC meds and can't really be considered the same at all. |
|
|
akafaultline wrote:I have treated hundreds of alcoholics who come in looking to get away from the cold and stay there for nothing else. They claim to have chest pain and because of the threat of lawsuits they get a whole work up, with blood work, x-rays, ekgs and everything else- them not paying forces the bill on to us. People are often underestimated in terms of their intelligence. I always like to keep in mind that the distribution of human intelligence has a small standard deviation when compared to the broader distribution of mammalian intelligence in general, and that there are many mammals one can think up which we would attribute to being able to perform higher cognitive functions. Here is a great example. As a result, it would not surprise me if a significant percentage of those homeless alcoholics are doing what they can to get back at the broader system as a whole. It is power where otherwise they have none. |
|
|
Palin's name looks to be top of the list for Secretary of Interior.... this can't be good. |
|
|
ViperScale wrote: It should only be there for car wrecks and other major things that don't happen to everyone every year. Largely it is only there for that. Yes, the plan might technically cover a doctor's visit, but most plans have large deductibles. If you're not a regular at the hospital, your occasional doctor visit is not going to fulfill your deductible obligations. If you only go to the doc twice a year, you're going to paying the entire tab for those two visits unless you have a really good insurance plan with a very low deductible. At least that's how it's worked with all the plans I've had anyway. $1000 deductable, $2500 copayment. Until I rack up $1k in charges, I have zero coverage for anything. |
|
|
Yeah, but the whole "death" thing... |





