New (big!) gym opening in Golden - Earthtreks
|
|
Walls are rough, I've watched them Lysol the blood my roommate left on the wall. Patch of skin 4x5" bloody and abrated. |
|
|
I've been generally psyched on the gym, but last night I watched a bunch of employees incorrectly argue with a climber using a Gri-Gri 1 about what the proper way to use it was, even to the point of the climber actually having the Petzl printout of approved methods in his pocket because he was obviously tired of being harassed. |
|
|
I am the belayer mentioned in the above post. Yes I am tired of being lectured to and harassed about something I do correctly. I have seen others lectured at for belaying correctly as well. |
|
|
JenH wrote:Walls are rough, I've watched them Lysol the blood my roommate left on the wall. Patch of skin 4x5" bloody and abrated. Would you prefer slick as glass? I love the uber sticky walls. But I also won't climb in shorts there. |
|
|
James Hicks wrote: I love the uber sticky walls. Just exactly what do you like about it? The only purpose I can think of is it makes the holds harder to spin. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: A single belay method means that anyone doing something different is easy to spot. This may be true, and it is also easier to have a strict policy in place that is enforced across the board, rather than asking the desk minions to use discretion in enforcement. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: I remember getting lectured at Planet Granite for not using the old 'Pinch and Slide' method for the ATC (i had just returned from my AMGA rock instructor course and was using the newer BUS method, something I had always used). At first I was pissed. Then I just shrugged. It's their facility, not mine. If I want to play, I have to follow the rules. It's not a statement about your abilities or knowledge, it's simply their way of making it easy for them to police possible dangers. A single belay method means that anyone doing something different is easy to spot. Remember, every rule in any climbing gym is designed around the lowest common denominator- which means the general public. You can not like it all you want, but at the end of the day, it's a private business that can and does enforce its posted rules. You can either play by them or you can go elsewhere. The market forces will take care of the rest. Hi John! |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: It's not a statement about your abilities or knowledge, it's simply their way of making it easy for them to police possible dangers. A single belay method means that anyone doing something different is easy to spot. Remember, every rule in any climbing gym is designed around the lowest common denominator- which means the general public. By that logic, everyone should tie in with figure 8 and never bowline or other knots? By that logic, everyone can only use gri gri or atc and no other devices? I agree that the rules should be made for the lowest common denominator. However, if a climbing gym staff can't acknowledge there are other correct and safe belay methods, I don't think that person is competent enough to stroll around the gym correcting others. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: It's not a statement about your abilities or knowledge, it's simply their way of making it easy for them to police possible dangers. No, it's a statement they haven't dealt with an experienced climbing population. This kind of BS just doesn't fly around here. If they insist, they'll find out soon enough they are not in Maryland anymore, say some time late fall. |
|
|
There's that saying, "One person ruins it for the rest of the group"...that is kind of what operating a climbing gym is like. You have to make ultra conservitive rules sometimes because somebody has been hurt, usually due to bad choices on their part. So a blanket statement like "No Skipping Clips" have to be implemented, like it or not. I agree that there are a lot of draws close together, and in most cases skipping a clip(like the first one) would not raise the climbers risk of injury...But what if( enter the scary lead fall scenario of your choice) happens? That's what gym managment needs to account for... the crazy stuff that happenes every once in a while. Does it affect community as a whole? Yes, but as one of you said earlier, their house their rules. You have to play by house rules if you want to play there. I have to say I'd take folks complaining about getting cuts and pulled in the first draw more,than having broken backs and bones sticking out of there skin once every ten years. |
|
|
reboot wrote: No, it's a statement they haven't dealt with an experienced climbing population. This kind of BS just doesn't fly around here. If they insist, they'll find out soon enough they are not in Maryland anymore, say some time late fall. But Reboot... are you still climbing there? If so, wouldn't that mean that the "BS" is flying around there? Beacuse you're still giving money to a place you obviously have disagreements with. Sounds like the gym is winning out on that front. |
|
|
Kai Huang wrote: By that logic, everyone should tie in with figure 8 and never bowline or other knots? By that logic, everyone can only use gri gri or atc and no other devices? I agree that the rules should be made for the lowest common denominator. However, if a climbing gym staff can't acknowledge there are other correct and safe belay methods, I don't think that person is competent enough to stroll around the gym correcting others. There are gyms that do precisely that; require figure 8's only and a particular belay device. In fact, I'd wager that most gyms are not ok with bowlines. |
|
|
An update... I've been in contact with the powers that be at corporate. My contact was concerning skipping the first bolt and I did not address the belay-style issue. As far as the first bolt is concerned, corporate has been receptive and has stated to me that they will be changing their policy regarding the first bolt for the Golden ET only (the first bolts at the MD gyms are apparently higher). This may take a little time to get communicated to the staff but it is progress in the right direction. |
|
|
RB81 wrote: But Reboot... are you still climbing there? If so, wouldn't that mean that the "BS" is flying around there? Beacuse you're still giving money to a place you obviously have disagreements with. Sounds like the gym is winning out on that front. It would seem that Reboot is referring to when Movement will be opening up a new gym in Denver this coming fall. Many people will be making decisions on which facility best suits them. |
|
|
RB81 wrote: But Reboot... are you still climbing there? If so, wouldn't that mean that the "BS" is flying around there? Beacuse you're still giving money to a place you obviously have disagreements with. Sounds like the gym is winning out on that front. I don't know why I'm responding to a shill, but no, I went there once and haven't been back. That it happens to be less conveniently located for me and cost more doesn't help either. I have plenty of friends climbing there though. But other than the ones that actually live in Golden, everyone else I know who go there now are waiting for Movement Denver to open. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: Most importantly- our insurance requires us to follow our own rules. If god forbid any accident occurred and any rule wasn't followed- then our insurance wouldn't cover it and the gym would go out of business. So if the management is receptive to relaxing the first draw rule, then it must not be written in stone for the their insurance, right? I imagine it couldn't be such a fast change if the insurance evaluation had to be re-done to change the rules. |
|
|
Doug Shepherd wrote: So if the management is receptive to relaxing the first draw rule, then it must not be written in stone for the their insurance, right? I imagine it couldn't be such a fast change if the insurance evaluation had to be re-done to change the rules. Every insurance policy is different, and if it is able to be changed, my assumption would be that it isn't in the insurance policy. My other assumption is that the first draw was placed by the wall builders a little lower than they thought when the padding obviously wasn't there, small mistake. It's good to hear that they are responding. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote: I would suspect its written in a way that lets them change it (i.e, climbers cannot be above X number of feet without being clipped in). We have a similar policy at our gym and allow climbers to skip the first clip, but not the second. Right. So my bet is that they have flexibility in a lot of these policies and that they should be acting reasonably towards the clientele at the gym versus harassing a subset. |
|
|
Our guiding business will also be a part of custom jewelry business. So any barter options for a day pass for two persons? |
|
|
Bill Wa wrote: Our guiding business will also be a part of custom jewelry business. So any barter options for a day pass for two persons? Did you make the jewelry Billenor? Or did Ginger? |





