Accident on Manic Crack in NM
|
|
Best wishes Kerr. |
|
|
Seems like this guy is trolling, looking for fame, or just gave in to the knee-jerk reaction of wanting to cover for his mistakes by laying blame. |
|
|
So the first thing I'd like to bring up is Guideline #1 when posting, don't be a jerk! I know it's asking for a lot from some of y'all, but seriously. |
|
|
its been a few years ago but i recall climbing this route and i am confident gear was too small for the crack. at 40 feet you should have been on a .5 C4, not an x4. i would fully expect "damaged" cams when ripping out poor placements. |
|
|
That is correct Trevor, but Kerr was not 40' up yet. He was below the hand jam. ~25 - 30 feet. The reddit poster was mistaken on a few things. Having looked at it, the placements were not unreasonable and within the range of the cams. I'm going to hold off on posting any additional info as this is Kerr's bag, just wanted to try to quell some of the hate posting on this site. |
|
|
A few things. First, I hope the Kerr recovers fully and can get back to climbing ASAP. David, cams are certainly not infallible, but individual humans, experienced or novice, are far more likely to make a mistake than a three sigma manufacturing process is. The comparison another user made to Aliens seems far fetched - wasn't the process used to manufacture CCH aliens rife with opportunities for human error to enter the equation? |
|
|
Wanted to point out.... from the original post on reddit, by the friend, see below. He's acknowledging the several possibilities. They're not saying that it definitely was defective equipment. They are saying, that it is one of the possibilties. This seems fair. |
|
|
why no pics??? |
|
|
Look, everyone knows we all make mistakes, accidents happen, and it could just as easily have been anyone else. That's why Kerr is feeding into every climbers' fears when he's not in a good situation to do so. I am glad that it sounds like he will make a full recovery. But you have to admit he is getting certain kinds of reactions because he made many questionable decisions about how to communicate his experience. The first of which being this: |
|
|
pokey wrote:Look, everyone knows we all make mistakes, accidents happen, and it could just as easily have been anyone else. That's why Kerr is feeding into every climbers' fears when he's not in a good situation to do so. I am glad that it sounds like he will make a full recovery. But you have to admit he is getting certain kinds of reactions because he made many questionable decisions about how to communicate his experience. The first of which being this: If he titled his post "I was in an accident," and he said, "hey guys I was in a bad accident... I am in the hospital but I think I'll be ok eventually. I am just having trouble understanding why my three X4s all failed to catch my fall and are now damaged. I'll try to post photos of them later." Then he probably would have gotten sympathy, encouragement, and helpful responses. But instead he and his friends chose to say, essentially, "PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT from me, the almost-AMGA-certified guy: YOUR CAMS MAY BE DEFECTIVE and I'm not going to explain until later. PS I know I'm right because I made perfect placements." You see the difference? Of course the reaction was going to be bad; don't act so surprised and indignant about it. I disagree. This the MP and the internet. He would have gotten the same response no matter what. |
|
|
Thank you for everyone who had something positive to say. I'm up walking around (kind of) If I have my brace on. |
|
|
pokey wrote:Look, everyone knows we all make mistakes, accidents happen, and it could just as easily have been anyone else. That's why Kerr is feeding into every climbers' fears when he's not in a good situation to do so. I am glad that it sounds like he will make a full recovery. But you have to admit he is getting certain kinds of reactions because he made many questionable decisions about how to communicate his experience. The first of which being this: If he titled his post "I was in an accident," and he said, "hey guys I was in a bad accident... I am in the hospital but I think I'll be ok eventually. I am just having trouble understanding why my three X4s all failed to catch my fall and are now damaged. I'll try to post photos of them later." Then he probably would have gotten sympathy, encouragement, and helpful responses. But instead he and his friends chose to say, essentially, "PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT from me, the almost-AMGA-certified guy: YOUR CAMS MAY BE DEFECTIVE and I'm not going to explain until later. PS I know I'm right because I made perfect placements." You see the difference? Of course the reaction was going to be bad; don't act so surprised and indignant about it. I do apologize for the poor construction of my post. I was in the hospital in a lot of pain and heavily medicated and didn't have the presence of mind. To be perfectly honest, I was concerned for other people. I figured doing something was better than nothing. |
|
|
No need to apologize. You were reaching out to the community, with your thoughts and some potentially important information. Who knows, maybe there is something wrong with the X4's. We shall see. |
|
|
I am really glad to hear that you are already up and walking around. Regardless of whether it was user error or gear failure, I believe that there are a huge number of folks out here who have never met you but are pulling for you to make a fast and complete recovery. |
|
|
Kerr Adams wrote:Well, it would appear the accident is legit. The story behind it seems a bit fishy though. A cam failing on a "take"? I don't buy it... Los Alamos Daily Post </quote I does sound fishy, I know. But I am not lying. I definitely was not implying you were lying, just that the exact details sounded a bit odd. I certainly hope you get healed up and back to climbing soon! No ill will meant. |
|
|
Kerr Adams wrote: I do apologize for the poor construction of my post. I was in the hospital in a lot of pain and heavily medicated and didn't have the presence of mind. To be perfectly honest, I was concerned for other people. I figured doing something was better than nothing. I am sorry about your accident and wish you a full recovery. |
|
|
Heal fast! It is importat to learn from accidents, and it is always best to hear from the source. |
|
|
michael s... wrote: ......... Failing. Under a few hundred lbs of force when they are supposed to withstand several thousand. If even one failed under this circumstance that would be sensational. You must be doing "NEW" math. The first cam allegedly failed under body weight. But, the cams below that would have been subject to lead falls... on a fairly short section of rope, quite a bit more than a few hundred pounds force. The rope would have given up some of its dynamics to the "take" depending on how much it took for the first piece to pull leaving less dynamics for the two successive pieces. Not saying this would lead to gear failure. Just one piece in a complex puzzle. |
|
|
Sigh......well done. I now see that it is probably more likely than not this guy had 3 cams fail on him due to his massive take-induced whipper. Excuse my misuse of the word "several". |
|
|
michael s... wrote:Sigh......well done. I now see that it is probably more likely than not this guy had 3 cams fail on him due to his massive take-induced whipper. Excuse my misuse of the word "several". Hilarious! |




