Crag/Backpacking options!
|
|
I did some reading around and it seemed as if people were not too happy about the Osprey Variant 52. Is there any specific reason? |
|
|
I would say go try as many of them on as you can, and see which fits the best. |
|
|
I have the Osprey atmos 50 and like it alot, with that said its designed for backpacking and not climbing. keep that in mind. itll do the job for sure. i have several ospreys and love them all. just my experience. |
|
|
If you ever backpack to crags and climb I'd recomend bigger pack that you can get all backpacking gear for 4 nights and a rope, rack and gear in. I have 80L it fits good, and it shrinks down to 40 - 50 L no prob for just backpacking. I also have a 32L that I use for long multi pitch + long approach day or cragging. My 2 cents... |
|
|
I have a Wild Things Ice Sac, which I don't think they make anymore but is about 50 l. Good enough for alpine stuff or ice and also big enough for real light multiday trips into the Sierra. The Andinista is an awesome pack but probably over your price range. Cold Cold World also makes nice alpine packs that would probably suit what you're looking for. |
|
|
FYI-I've got a mint original Andinista that I posted for $150.00. |
|
|
Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I ended up with the Variant 52. Was tempted to get the Mammut Trion Guide. Both were fabulous backpacks but the single size of the Mammut Trion Guide meant that the fit wasn't quite right. The Variant 52 fit me perfectly. So that solved the dilemma. |
|
|
I've used the Atmos for years as a day pack. It is a great pack, fits like a dream. However, it is much too small to use as a backpacking pack unless you go ultralight. If you want a true all in one pack, go with something bigger. |
|
|
sweet looking crag pack: |
|
|
rogerbenton wrote:sweet looking crag pack: mountainproject.com/v/fs---… +1! |




