How long should I expect to suck at climbing cracks?
|
|
I'm a sport-climber. Started getting into alpine about 2 years ago. Have climbed a bunch of routes in RMNP, Tetons, and other 14ers around CO. To give you some idea, I've swapped leads on Syke's Sickle, Culp-Bossier, and plan to the Casual Route this summer. |
|
|
Took me a full season to get used to all the moves of crack climbing. Practice on easier climbs below your grade and work up. Crack climbing can be a lot of fun and gets very challenging when there's a lot of pin scars and other features. Understand what ring locks, finger stacks, and other basic moves are. The feet will always be painful when crack climbing. Sticking your foot in sideways and twisting can get old quick but fun routes make it worth it. |
|
|
I should add, that (I think because of my sport climbing background) finger cracks are much more enjoyable. A finger lock feels just like a crimp basically, and without being able to jam my feet too far into the crack, it feels like toeing in on a small hold. Off-widths actually are fine too, when the crack is wide enough, it generally doesn't hurt my feet too bad. It's that Creek hand crack size, about the #2 range that the pain is just insane. |
|
|
Are you turning your knee in toward the crack after putting your foot in? |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote: Foot jams hurt my feet unbelievably bad. No, I'm not wearing super-aggro Muiras that are two sizes too small. I think this is only true for certain sizes of cracks since my feet obviously fit better in some compared to others, but hand cracks literally cause excruciating pain. I can hand jam pretty well, but I can move about 10 feet before the pain in my feet, specifically my toes, gets to be too much. I'm not trying to toot my own horn here, but I think my pain tolerance is high enough that I can comfortably say, if crack climbing hurt everyone this bad, nobody would do it. Maybe this is purely a technique issue as I'm still learning, but should I just expect crack climbing to hurt pretty badly all the time? Crack climbing really shouldn't be painful. There are some size that might hurt a bit (ring locks...), but not excruciatingly so. Hand cracks, in particular, should not be a painful experience. When climbing hand cracks, I experience no pain in hand or feet; I find them to be quite comfortable. So, if you are in excruciating pain, something is wrong. |
|
|
John Wilder wrote:it might be worth asking- are your toes bunched at all in your shoes? if they're not flat, thats why. also, the art of jamming with your feet is more about standing on your foot while its sideways than it is about torquing your foot hard enough so your heel is facing down and you're standing on it like you would be on the ground or while face climbing. so, less torque, flatter toes = less pain. I'm climbing in a pair of these: 6pm.com/evolv-evo-blue-stee…. |
|
|
Jon Moen wrote: Featureless faces with pure jams cracks, like at Indian Creek, are a freakish exception; they are not the norm (that is why the Creek is so special...and specialized). In the real world- outside of the wonderland that is Moab, Ut- most crack climbs are surrounded by face features. This seems very true in Colorado, in particular. Occasional use of footholds on the face will give your feet a respite from jamming, and keep the pain-and the pump- from building too much. Mastery of crack climbing involves a lot more than learning how to jam straight-in cracks. Learning how to judge when it is appropriate to jam and when it is appropriate to utilize face features is an equally important skill. I think this is true. That said, I'm very, very comfortable face climbing. In fact, I frequently turn 5.8 cracks into 5.12+ face climbs/laybacks, it's one of my specialties (see Star Wars in Eldo for reference). My goal in going to the Creek was to force myself to only use the crack because, although unusual, crack happens, especially when climbing in alpine in places like the Eastern Sierra, where a crack is all you get with minimal or no face holds. Really what I'm saying is that if given the choice between crack and face, I always go face. However, I want to be prepared for those unique situations where you literally have nothing else if I have to follow a crux crack, my partner gets injured or incapacitated, and I also don't want to be the guy who has to plan which pitches to lead to avoid getting the crack pitch. I climb in Eldo frequently so I'm really solid at using cracks for holds and protection as well as face holds. Like I said though, I just want to be prepared. |
|
|
Like many of us, probably for life. |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote: I have no ambition to climb hard splitters at the Creek, I just want to be good enough that I'm comfortable on an alpine crack. Are Creek splitters good training for alpine climbing? I know granite (which is generally the rock in the alpine) forms differently than Wingate sandstone. Generally, granite has bottlenecks and variances in the crack that are different than the splitter nature of the Creek. In sum, my question is, does climbing at the Creek help climb in the alpine or am I better off just spending time in Vedauwoo, Eldo, and easier "crack-heavy" routes in RMNP? Practice on the style of rock/crack that you wish to perform on. The Creek is a great place to perfect your jams, but at this point you may be better off getting more accustomed to granite cracks. Make a trip to Turkey Rocks, and to Fremont Canyon (WY). Run TR laps on cracks you find difficult, and try to climb it more efficiently with each lap. |
|
|
There is always some pain in crack climbing, but what you're experiencing is more than necessary. Go ahead and get some really comfy shoes like the Mythos and see how it goes. They'll let you feel what is going on better and help you figure out your technique to get it to hurt less. |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote: I think this is true. That said, I'm very, very comfortable face climbing. In fact, I frequently turn 5.8 cracks into 5.12+ face climbs/laybacks, it's one of my specialties (see Star Wars in Eldo for reference). My goal in going to the Creek was to force myself to only use the crack because, although unusual, crack happens, especially when climbing in alpine in places like the Eastern Sierra, where a crack is all you get with minimal or no face holds. Really what I'm saying is that if given the choice between crack and face, I always go face. However, I want to be prepared for those unique situations where you literally have nothing else if I have to follow a crux crack, my partner gets injured or incapacitated, and I also don't want to be the guy who has to plan which pitches to lead to avoid getting the crack pitch. I climb in Eldo frequently so I'm really solid at using cracks for holds and protection as well as face holds. Like I said though, I just want to be prepared. In that case, maybe spending some time at the Creek is the way to go. |
|
|
When climbing crack oriented stuff at Lumpy, RMNP, Zion, the Voo, or the Creek I generally use TC Pros, which have a bit of padding in them for jamming and are high tops. They are sized such that I can walk the descent back to my pack and then eat lunch with little to no discomfort while wearing them but still have sensitivity for moderately harder pitches (5.11 or so). I have zero pain in these shoes and my toes are totally flat in there. That being said, I know what you mean. Indian Creek hand cracks can be weird on my feet too. The flares are the Voo can be more forgiving I think. The TC pros are expensive and happen to fit my feet just so. They are worth a look. You'll get it, just keep at it. Good luck with the Diamond! |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote: Another question I'll pose is that I don't like crack climbing. For me, it removes one of the most fun and challenging parts of climbing, figuring out sequences. I'm sure there is some sequencing that goes on when crack climbing, either in terms of placing gear, handling a steep section or a pod, etc., but I don't think it's a stretch to say, it's basically the same move over and over. this might be one of the reasons that crack climbing is giving you a hard time - that you don't understand the technical aspects, but think you do. on easy cracks there might not be particular sequences, but this can also be said for easy face climbing. when you start climbing harder cracks, you will realize that there are sequencing issues. also, another issue is that with pure crack climbing, your body is often harder to control in terms of inertia about your vertical axis (ie barn dooring). |
|
|
1 year 2 days, 3 hrs. and 27 minutes. |
|
|
shuminW wrote: To the OP, with your current attitude, it'll take a long time. Embrace the challenge and you'll learn much more quickly. Not really sure where in my post I expressed an unwillingness to learn or embrace the challenge. In fact, the point of this post is because I'm trying to learn and embracing the challenge. I just don't like the feeling that the only thing keeping me from sending is my ability to tolerate pain. Hence why I asked for some help, advice, pointers, and other people's experiences. |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote:So, my toes curl in the Evolvs, not enough to be uncomfortable, but perhaps I need a shoe where they don't turn at all. This is your pain problem. They need to be flat. Like, look at your feet when you're not wearing any shoes and note the natural curling of your toes. That's just about the limit to how curled your toes can be before jams become really painful. When you stand in the shoes in the store, you should feel every toe pressing on the ground. |
|
|
Get a shoe that is board lasted. This means it cannot bend in the middle and crush your foot. I climb in the trad masters but many shoes have this 'stiffness'. Good luck. |
|
|
TheBirdman wrote: Unlike high-end bouldering or sport climbing, ...... I have no experience in hard cracks Therein lies the trouble. Generally, harder climbs are more interesting, more sequential, more inspiring, etc. If you are comparing high-end sport to moderate trad puttering, then the moderate puttering isn't going to seem that exciting. 5.8 cracks generally don't require a high level of focused precision or a wild sequence, like a 5.12+ sport route will. In this comparison, the 5.8 crack seems pretty dull. A 5.8 sport route doesn't require much sequence or precision either, though; in fact, the 5.8 crack is probably the more aesthetic and interesting of the two. Compare 5.8 cracks to 5.8 faces, and 5.12 cracks to 5.12 faces. In these comparisons, I think that you'll find the cracks to be plenty sequential and interesting. |
|
|
Some people just happen to have super sensitive feet. If you ski, how do your feet feel in ski boots? My dad can't even weight a foot jam without it causing him severe pain and that is in super comfortable mythos. I can wear shoes that have my toes completely curled and stand of foot jams all day with only mild discomfort. Maybe try wearing a loose shoe that you can wear thick socks with for extra padding. Maybe take some ibuprofen. Maybe go to the base of a climb and stand on foot jams for a couple hours to kill off all those bothersome nerves. Try jamming the foot in at different depths ranging from just the tip of the shoe to burying your foot to the ankle. |
|
|
You don't need a board lasted shoe to make foot jams less painful. I do foot jams in Moccasyms and they are usually fairly comfortable. It's really your technique. Try pointing your toes straight down into the crack if it is too painful. You won't be torquing the foot at all that way. |
|
|
I happen to wear the same shoes (Evolv Evo) as you for most of my serious jamming. They are great at climbing crack, if they're sized properly. |




