Totem Basic Cams are HERE
|
|
JLP wrote: It is very equipment dependent. To measure Rockwell with, say, an inexpensive pendulum type device and whatever tip, the results are going to be very operator dependent. Which is why it's done as a comparative measurement against certified samples in the expected range of what you're measuring; it removes the influence of the operator. In any case, the range of operator influence in the results is nowhere near large enough to explain the 20 or 30 point variations I found. A point or two, sure. But not 20 or 30. JLP wrote: You're agreeing with me and furthering my point. If it says 6061-T6, it probably is. Sorry about that bit; I thought you were saying that you needed to be Boeing to get certified material. My bad. JLP wrote:I do like the softening by "old school hardening" theory. Somehow I picture an oven meant for horse shoes, built in the early 1900's. Unsubstantiated story I heard was heating them with a torch and tossing them in a bucket of water. Another, and more likely, story I heard (from the 3rd party that validated my results) is that the extrusion house may have been counting on the heat of the extrusion process to heat treat the bars rather than doing a proper heat treat on them. Only way to tell would be a crystalline analysis of the samples, and while the guy I sent them to was more than happy to do for me as a favor, he wasn't so thrilled with CCH getting a hold of the results of a test that would have otherwise cost them quite a bit of money. And since a hardness test was sufficient to show that the samples were not in fact 6061-T6 we took a pass on further testing. |
|
|
Yup, and since John is not the past employee I heard the heat-with-a-torch story from I personally think the chances of funny things going on there metallurgy-wise are pretty high. |
|
|
I agree with the impressions of the review. |
|
|
Got the Red, Yellow & Green Totem Basic Cams in the mail today. Ordered them on 10/5, got them on 10/13. Interestingly, they were shipped UPS Ground from Portland, Oregon on 10/7. |
|
|
See what I'm talking about? |
|
|
It is so funny to see people compare cams by just a glance at the heads. Especially when trying to compare Black Diamond C4s to others. BD C4 have a double axle. |
|
|
I've found visually comparing them helps a bunch. From the picture I can see that the Totem Red will fit in a more shallow slot than the purple C4. |
|
|
Does anyone know if Totem has plans to make smaller basics? I never used aliens, but from what I've read, the smallest sizes are where they really excel. |
|
|
Simon Hatfield wrote:Does anyone know if Totem has plans to make smaller basics? I never used aliens, but from what I've read, the smallest sizes are where they really excel. Yes and No. Once you got below the Green Alien the design changed. The cams were too small to use the internal spring design so they went back to the normal external spring setup. This made the head width of the cam WIDER than other options in that size range. In areas where the cracks were DEEP (Moab, IC) the wider head width didn't make a difference in placements so the Blue and Black Aliens still were good. In other areas where the cracks bottomed out or where pin scared the wider head width was a liability for more placements. |
|
|
Are they still that super-soft aluminum that CCH made them out of? I prefer the "normal" aluminum of WC or BD, metolius is unnecessarily hard, IMO, and the old Aliens were so soft that the cams deformed if you fell on them hard. |
|
|
Functionality-wise, how would you expect these Totem Basics to perform better/worse than Metolious Mastercams of the same size? |
|
|
Spri wrote:Are they still that super-soft aluminum that CCH made them out of? I prefer the "normal" aluminum of WC or BD, metolius is unnecessarily hard, IMO, and the old Aliens were so soft that the cams deformed if you fell on them hard. Boy, that shows that you don't know what you are talking about. |
|
|
Killis Howard wrote:Now that I'm dirty broke again, I'm gonna see which ones start having brazing issues and blown heads first, and then buy a couple of the other company's. Always a solid plan with new gear. Even new old gear. |
|
|
After placing an order on the Totem website, how long has it been taking folks to receive the order? |
|
|
Took 8 days from order to receipt from Oregon to New York. |
|
|
4 days from order to receipt. |
|
|
Heads up, a box of 30 of these Totem Basics were stolen in Portland Oregon. If anyone sees any suspicions sales (brand new Totem basics from a non-climber Meth head type for instance) please report it on Cascadeclimbers.com attention Plaidman. http://cascadeclimbers.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/841204/all/Possible_stolen_gear_being_sol |
|
|
Anyone had a chance to get out and use the Totem Basics over the past few months since this thread went up? Just wondering how the most recent comparisons of Totem, Fixe, and the originals are looking. |
|
|
Mark S wrote: Boy, that shows that you don't know what you are talking about. Doesn't sound like you've ever seen a well used one. |
|
|
Has anyone else had trouble with the trigger cables severing themselves on Totem Basics? |








