Stolen draws up by the Coffin.

Mag, he didn't miss your sarcasm; you missed his. All the other (sarcastic, hypothetical) activities resulted in left gear because of EDIT: deferred success.

So what was wrong with your performance in bed? That one didn't belong in the (sarcastic, hypothetical) list unless you were (sarcastically, hypothetically) saying you can't quite deliver.

Get it?

huh!?! leaving project draws is failure?!
did i miss something?

better? :)

deferred success.
i like.

WiledHorse wrote:huh!?! leaving project draws is failure?! did i miss something?

You fail at understanding.
If you're projecting a route you're trying it and haven't sent it yet.
Every time you give it a go and the route remains a project you've failed at climbing it. So yes, project draws = failure (EDIT to calm the weak-of-heart: but impending success).

Price, mag, funneh!
Mike, that's what I'm talking about, make them work for their booty!

Boissal wrote: You fail at understanding.

huh!?

Boissal wrote: You fail at understanding. If you're projecting a route you're trying it and haven't sent it yet. Every time you give it a go and the route remains a project you've failed at climbing it. So yes, project draws = failure

Not necessarily. Depends on your goal. Ex:If you get on your project with the goal of climbing the first crux clean, that you have not succeeded at previously, and you do..... then that is a personal success. Others may view it as a failure bc they don't know what your goal is.

Aimee Bates wrote: Not necessarily. Depends on your goal. Ex:If you get on your project with the goal of climbing the first crux clean, that you have not succeeded at previously, and you do..... then that is a personal success. Others may view it as a failure bc they don't know what your goal is.

i agree with Aimee.
success/failure is relative to the eyes of the beholder.

its not always about the finish line, Boissal

WiledHorse wrote: i agree with Aimee. success/failure is relative to the eyes of the beholder. its not always about the finish line, Boissal

He agrees. Well, he would if he hadn't pushed all conscious thought out of his brain. On the other hand, when he goes home, he won't leave any clothing when behind.

the area is private land, I don't think steel perma-draws are appropriate

I don't think project draws in Little Cottonwood are a good idea because it is almost completely made up of either wilderness or private land

I am sorry your draws got nabbed, my wallet and phone were stolen from that area last summer

Shawn Mitchell wrote:Mag, he didn't miss your sarcasm; you missed his. All the other (sarcastic, hypothetical) activities resulted in left gear because of EDIT: deferred success. So what was wrong with your performance in bed? That one didn't belong in the (sarcastic, hypothetical) list unless you were (sarcastically, hypothetically) saying you can't quite deliver. Get it?

Yes Shawn. Got it. Thanks for pointing out the obvious. All of my example were jokes including the bedroom. One is equally silly as the next including the draws.

grayhghost wrote:the area is private land

The above statement is wrong.

Regarding climbs on the northside of LCC Canyon.

The Coffin and environs (Bong Eater, Egg, Crescent Crack, etc) is public land. Everything down canyon from the LDS Church Vaults is public land owned by the Bureau of Reclamation and Forest Service. All of it is managed by the Forest Service who consider any gear left on routes to be abandoned and trash.

For completeness, climbing up canyon from the vaults up to and including the Gate Buttress proper are on land owned by the LDS Church. The Black Peeler environs is owned by Pertetual Storage. Farther up canyon is then again publicly owned land.

Allen Sanderson wrote:I posted this last fall in a similar thread ... Top 10 Reason why not to leave gear on projects...

Oh, that's a good one.

Shawn Mitchell wrote: He agrees. Well, he would if he hadn't pushed all conscious thought out of his brain. On the other hand, when he goes home, he won't leave any clothing when behind.

how do you know?

WiledHorse wrote: its not always about the finish line, Boissal

???
You guys are unreal...
As much as I hate to append **READ CAREFULLY, IRONY MIGHT BE PRESENT IN THE FOLLOWING PIECE OF WRITING** to every post I make, this thread might make it necessary. If you missed this one you'll miss them all.

WiledHorse wrote: how do you know?

How do I know he won't leave clothes?
Or how do I know what he's thinking when even he doesn't know what he's thinking, because he's not?

I'm thinking.

Boissal wrote: ??? You guys are unreal... As much as I hate to append **READ CAREFULLY, IRONY MIGHT BE PRESENT IN THE FOLLOWING PIECE OF WRITING** to every post I make, this thread might make it necessary. If you missed this one you'll miss them all.

huh!?

Shawn Mitchell wrote: How do I know he won't leave clothes? Or how do I know what he's thinking when even he doesn't know what he's thinking, because he's not?

i dont know.

Shawn Mitchell wrote:I'm thinking.

huh!?