Gear Review - Black Diamond C3s
|
|
Welcome to the first in a series of gear reviews that I’m starting up. With a bit of dedication (and time) I hope to publish reviews on a regular basis. As always, your comments are much appreciated, so if you have any thoughts about the format, findings or have any gear that you would like to see reviewed please let me know. Okay, here goes:
C3s, sizes 000, 00, 0, 2 (missing size 1) Size 00 C3 placed in a shallow flared crack Close up of the above placement The cam lobes on the smallest sizes, (000, 00, 0) are smooth. Size 1 and 2 have teeth. My assumption here is that if teeth on the smallest sizes may make removal more difficult since it is possible to get crystals hung up in the gaps. Whether teeth increase the holding power is up for debate. They appear to work fine without teeth. The head profile is also narrower in width than that of other cams on the market, especially in the smaller sizes. Measured with a ruler, C3 cam head width varies between 28 and 30 mm (1.10" - 1.18"). Width comparison between two similar sized cams Width comparison between an Alien and C3 cam (as close as possible to the same size) Width comparison between an Alien and C3 cam (as close as possible to the same size) Specifications Size Range Strength Weight Color 000 0.30 - 0.50" (7.8 - 12.9mm) 4kN 55g Gray 00 0.35 - 0.54" (9.0 - 13.7mm) 6kN 57g Purple 0 0.42 - 0.62" (10.7 - 15.8mm) 7kN 59g Green 1 0.47 - 0.74" (12.0 - 18.8mm) 10kN 62g Red 2 0.56 - 0.89" (14.2 - 22.6mm) 10kN 66g Yellow Comparison to Aliens made by Colorado Custom Hardware(Cost: @$60.00) no size-range Wt width strength Color inches gm inches kN lbf .33 .33-.54 66 1.40 8 1800 black 3/8 .39-.67 71 1.40 9 2025 blue .5 .50-.86 74 1.30 9 2025 green .75 .61-.1.07 74 1.30 9 2025 yellow 7/8 .78-1.12 84 1.30 12 2700 gray 1 .75-1.33 88 1.30 12 2700 red 1.25 .97-1.5 108 1.56 14 3300 gold 1.5 1.03-1.63 110 1.56 16 3700 orange 2 1.20-1.95 122 1.56 16 3700 violet 2.5 1.40-2.35 139 1.56 16 3700 white Overall Impression The C3s are a pleasure to climb with. The large thumb loop makes them easy to place, the cam fits the hand nicely, and isn't prone to dropping. But the mechanism is relatively stiff and takes some getting use too. Over time I expect that this problem will diminish with practice. The plastic sleeve is very helpful for pushing into cracks and pin scars just out of reach. The springs really seem to help hold them in place in tenuous situations. The large thumb loop allows you to clip shorter and will be a nice feature for aid climbing. Size 000 C3 in a tight placement Bottom Line The C3 is a very well made small cam and a welcome addition to the small crack protection fleet. It's a precision instrument, undoubtedly with a lot of R and D undertaken. Although I was initially concerned about the stiffness of the pull mechanism this proved to be a non issue as I wasn’t conscious of it while climbing. If you are building up your rack or supplementing your current thin crack pro for aid or free climbing, then the C3s would be a good choice. They are a small crack alternative to Aliens. In closing, I have one suggestion for Black Diamond with regard to the C3s and that's the price; $69.95 just seems too much, a view shared by all of the testers and people with whom I spoke with about them. I reckon once the price gets down to below 60 bucks they'll be flying off the shelves. Thanks to the other members of the test crew; Eric Jolley and Mike Carr, for providing feedback. It’s a tough job but someone has to do it! So that’s it, one down. Please let me know whether you think this is a worthwhile addition to the site. It takes a lot of time so if it’s not adding anything positive then I would rather spend my time climbing! If you would like to send me stuff to review, please rest assured it will be returned in about 4 to 6 weeks! Please email me and I can send out my contact details. Next on the agenda is the Black Diamond ATC Guide. It’s time to replace my tried and tested Petzl Reverso. Next Review: Black Diamond ATC Guide Black Diamond C3s are available at our following sponsors: Boulder: Neptunes Denver: Wilderness Exchange Unlimited Golden: Bentgate Please support our sponsors. Disclaimer: The cams were provided on a loan basis only. They have been returned to their owner. |
|
|
Great review John - thanks! |
|
|
Great review John. Thanks for the time you put into it. The pictures and specs were welcomed additions. I hadn't realized that the strength ratings on the smallest pieces were so low. Did you take any falls on them? |
|
|
Not having placed them, I'm not entirely certain of this, however, the head is extremely rigid compard to a CCH alien. Consequently, in non-optimal placements I would predict that the cam is likely either walk or lever some, possibly compromising the holding power. |
|
|
I did a lot of agreesive bounce testing on the smaller size 000 and size 00. I didn't take any falls. |
|
|
Scott, |
|
|
Great review, John. Nice close up pictures. |
|
|
Take some whippers on it man! Tell us how it goes. |
|
|
tenesmus wrote:Take some whippers on it man! Tell us how it goes. Used the C3s at Lone Peak this weekend and they were posh. Can't wait till they are affordable. Bentgate in Golden had on sale this weekend at 20 per cent off but I missed the boat. It was either cams or mortgage payment! Since they were on sale this weekend I wouldn't be surprised they go on sale again around thanksgiving when some of the fall sales hit the shops... |
|
|
I've been climbing with these most of the summer and they are splendid. One thing I really like, since I also carry Camalots in the larger sizes, is that the color schemes are consistent. This makes it much easier for a partner to climb with your rack or vice versa, as it's a lot easier to recognize the size progression. |
|
|
It seems that everyone wants to know how these guys hold up for a fall. I pulled out a #00 C3 and fell 20 feet before a #3 C4 caught me. I didn't have the chance to compare a #00 TCU in the same conditions because my heel was injured in the fall. To tell the truth, I don't want to compare. The rock was probably more responsible for the failure than the C3 (the rock didn't offer any other placement options, and wouldn't take a nut). Besides, any cam that small wasn't meant to catch a whipper (low strength ratings). I would still consider adding C3s to my rack, if TCUs weren't so inexpensive. |
|
|
i love my c3s... i still carry the TCUs that i have always used but the c3s are great for pin scars and weird placements... |
|
|
I purchased all five of the C3s a few months after they became available. They seemed like well thought out and well made units. I packed away the 000 because it is only for direct aid. Within a few weeks of use, the trigger action started getting choppy on the remaining four units. When I would squeeze the triggers all the way to the stopping point and then release the trigger, there was a brief split second pause before the units would expand. I cleaned them, lubed them, cleaned them again and they were still having the issue. In January of this year, I sent them into Black Diamond in Salt Lake City, and they called me stating that there was not a problem with them, just that I needed to clean them. They sent them back to me. |
|
|
I've been climbing on C3s for 6 months now... and for the most part have liked them. I was using the green and purple sizes (two smallest) along with Aliens for the remaining sizes. Needless to say I haven't been using my Aliens lately, and have been using the larger C3s instead.
The thing that surprised me was the cam lobe totally inverting. Obviously the cams are designed to be used umbrellaed (if absolutely necessary), but the interlocking design only works if all cams umbrella equally. |
|
|
Andy Laakmann wrote:The thing that surprised me was the cam lobe totally inverting. Andy, I am having a hard time envisioning this. Can you post a picture? |
|
|
I don't have a picture handy... but imagine two adjacent cam lobes engaged, and the third cam lobe completely upside down in the crack (the crack flared in the back and the rope action walked the cam backwards). |
|
|
Nice review, but I think it's silly to write a glowing review and end with a suggestion to lower the price. |
|
|
Now that it's been made know that C3 production will be shifting to China , I can't decide whether to wean off of all camalots or stock up on American/SLC made ones. |
|
|
Good point Reddirtgirl. It's time to stock up! |
|
|
paulraphael wrote:Nice review, but I think it's silly to write a glowing review and end with a suggestion to lower the price. They're not stupid at B.D.; they sell gear at the price they have to. Climbing gear has a ridiculously low margin compared with most other things around the house. You already mentioned the design, the obvious amount of r&d, the fit and finish ... And you can probably imagine the overhead, the quality control costs, and the liability insurance. It's really pretty remarkable that any cams cost under $100. I personally may not be able to afford a $70 cam, but that has nothing to do with whether the price is reasonable or not. I still think the C3 is overpriced. If it was 60.00 and not 70 I would buy them. Otherwise I'll continue to wait. I worked in retail for several years and it was amazing the difference in pricing makes. If we put something out on sale that was 10 percent off the full price it would fly off the shelves. With Master cams coming out at 59.95 each, C3's are going to be a tough sell in my opinion. |
|
|
Surely I can't be the only one who had to look up: Master Cams . On first impression, they look a little alienesque, no? |















