Mountain Project Logo

What's up with the RMNP Guidebook?

Daniel Kay · · Longmont, CO · Joined Sep 2014 · Points: 152
Tzilla Rapdrilla wrote:

Bernard should just hand over his info to someone who will actually finish the Estes book. It’s not like there’s any real money involved and maybe hand over the keys to the next generation. That’s what happened in Telluride and there’s an actual nice new guidebook there now. 

Someone other than Gillet is currently working on a new Estes guidebook. Not sure the timeline but I'm optimistic that we might see it soon.

Tony B · · Around Boulder, CO · Joined Jan 2001 · Points: 24,680
Tzilla Rapdrilla wrote:

Bernard should just hand over his info to someone who will actually finish the Estes book. It’s not like there’s any real money involved and maybe hand over the keys to the next generation. That’s what happened in Telluride and there’s an actual nice new guidebook there now. 

Except there are still new routes going up at certain areas in the Estes Valley with some pretty well populated new areas.
And that's 2 reasons why the new book isn't out. Somebody's been really busy and some new area isn't quite done.

Jack Sparrow · · Orlando, FL · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0

Hate to be off subject again but great sand dunes national Park/preserve is underrated for 13ers, the great sand dunes national Park/preserve is 233 square miles total and 65 sq miles of preserve, there are 6 named mountains exceeding 13,000' in only 65 SQ miles on the preserve 

Rocky mountain national Park on the other hand is 415 square miles and is only 20 mountains above 13,000' 

That means there is double the concentration of 13ers in the great sand dune national preserve (GSDNP) than RMNP

There's a 13er every 10 square miles at great sand dunes national preserve 

There's a 13er every 20 square miles at RMNP

My point is not that that the great sand dunes park/persevere has more 11ers or 12ers but my point is that it is not just a bunch of sand and is more concentrated per sq mile with 13ers than RMNP but make sure to wear orange if hiking the preserve during hunting season 

Bug Boy · · Boulder, CO :( · Joined Aug 2017 · Points: 81
Jack Sparrow wrote:

Hate to be off subject again but great sand dunes national Park/preserve is underrated for 13ers, the great sand dunes national Park/preserve is 233 square miles total and 65 sq miles of preserve, there are 6 named mountains exceeding 13,000' in only 65 SQ miles on the preserve 

Rocky mountain national Park on the other hand is 415 square miles and is only 20 mountains above 13,000' 

That means there is double the concentration of 13ers in the great sand dune national preserve (GSDNP) than RMNP

There's a 13er every 10 square miles at great sand dunes national preserve 

There's a 13er every 20 square miles at RMNP

My point is not that that the great sand dunes park/persevere has more 11ers or 12ers but my point is that it is not just a bunch of sand and is more concentrated per sq mile with 13ers than RMNP but make sure to wear orange if hiking the preserve during hunting season 

stop

Jack Sparrow · · Orlando, FL · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0
Bug Boy wrote:

stop

But Blanca peak is the #1 ranking mountain in the Rockies 

Pikes peak is short Harvard and massive aren't prominent elbert is short looking and not rugged capital peak is less rugged overall than Blanca (the great traverses gash ridge and little bear), hardest 4x4, and the wall between the couloir and Orme's buttress is still unclimbed Blanca peak has 9000' of unobstructed (pikes peak has foothills and mountains obstructing it's base) visual relief from mt zwischen summit when viewed in panorama from cucharas canyon to Blanca's North East wall

Robson Gannet and Teton have a lower rank in averaged rank in prominence and elevation than Blanca peak when you consider just the Rockies and no other range, if you were to consider other mountain ranges the list would be too huge 

Blanca peak is the 3rd most prominent, 4th most elevated, most un-obstructed visual relief, and most rugged 14er in the Rockies utterly robbing Robson, Teton, pikes, massive, longs peak, capital, and elbert of their throne 

Blanca peak is the true throne of the Rockies and of Earth

La garita caldera was the largest singular volcano eruption (not counting gradual eruptions, sequential eruptions, or multiple caldera) ever in Earth's history and is still debated as larger than wah wah 

Wah wah was an 8 for sure and not a 9

La garita caldera might have been a 9 but we are unsure because of overlapping volcanos that took place more recently than la garita caldera and high elevation erosion could be covering the true extent of la garita caldera 

La Garita caldera was the only volcano that was potentially a 9, Its still debatable if la garita is bigger than wah wah, however wah wah was not a 9, la garita caldera might have been a 9

If anything else Blanca is #2 to elbert and elbert is gentle and thus humbles all mountains 

Eli Chase · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jun 2023 · Points: 0
Jack Sparrow wrote:

But Blanca peak is the #1 ranking mountain in the Rockies 

Pikes peak is short Harvard and massive aren't prominent elbert is short looking and not rugged capital peak is less rugged overall than Blanca (the great traverses gash ridge and little bear), hardest 4x4, and the wall between the couloir and Orme's buttress is still unclimbed Blanca peak has 9000' of unobstructed (pikes peak has foothills and mountains obstructing it's base) visual relief from mt zwischen summit when viewed in panorama from cucharas canyon to Blanca's North East wall

Robson Gannet and Teton have a lower rank in averaged rank in prominence and elevation than Blanca peak when you consider just the Rockies and no other range, if you were to consider other mountain ranges the list would be too huge 

Blanca peak is the 3rd most prominent, 4th most elevated, most un-obstructed visual relief, and most rugged 14er in the Rockies utterly robbing Robson, Teton, pikes, massive, longs peak, capital, and elbert of their throne 

Blanca peak is the true throne of the Rockies and of Earth

La garita caldera was the largest singular volcano eruption (not counting gradual eruptions, sequential eruptions, or multiple caldera) ever in Earth's history and is still debated as larger than wah wah 

Wah wah was an 8 for sure and not a 9

La garita caldera might have been a 9 but we are unsure because of overlapping volcanos that took place more recently than la garita caldera and high elevation erosion could be covering the true extent of la garita caldera 

La Garita caldera was the only volcano that was potentially a 9, Its still debatable if la garita is bigger than wah wah, however wah wah was not a 9, la garita caldera might have been a 9

If anything else Blanca is #2 to elbert and elbert is gentle and thus humbles all mountains 

what does this have to do with the RMNP guidebook?

Davy Jones · · Shiprock, NM · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0
Eli Chase wrote:

what does this have to do with the RMNP guidebook?

Apparently there's some debt here due to the Jim crowe era Colorado being a free territory and the San juans and sangre de Cristo mountains being split by the Colorado southern border and the front range not and 9/11/2001 boulder can gth

Pueblo Santa Fe Farmington grand junction the San Luis valley and Durango as well as the other populated areas make up well over 700,000 residents which is more than Alaska or Wyoming and more densely populated than Montana North Dakota or South Dakota 

Divide Wyoming like the beef cow she is between North Colorado Nebraska South Dakota Montana Idaho and Utah 

Give Arizona part of South Utah and New Mexico up to the Arkansas river reservoirs and the Eastern areas of Arizona 

Utah will abandon much of lake Powell and get 100% of flaming gorge 

South Colorado is new west Virginia and the new 50th State we was founded by Robert Ford and Jesse James not Jim Bowie and Davey Crockett 

Blanca peak is Texas's Father!

And we'll draw a straight line through ship rock because it's a volcano unlike Matterhorn new Mexico keeps the south we keep the north 

And no less than half of the Gunnison and Arkansas (all Pueblo county)(New Mexico gets East of Pueblo county) rivers las animas county will be split the east to New Mexico the west to South Colorado at Mesa de Maya and the purgatoire river

Divide up the beef cow Wyoming!

Elevado? Elevar? Or South Colorado maybe? I will consider name suggestions 

Jack Sparrow · · Orlando, FL · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0
Davy Jones wrote:

Apparently there's some debt here due to the Jim crowe era Colorado being a free territory and the San juans and sangre de Cristo mountains being split by the Colorado southern border and the front range not and 9/11/2001 boulder can gth

Pueblo Santa Fe Farmington grand junction the San Luis valley and Durango as well as the other populated areas make up well over 700,000 residents which is more than Alaska or Wyoming and more densely populated than Montana North Dakota or South Dakota 

Divide Wyoming like the beef cow she is between North Colorado Nebraska South Dakota Montana Idaho and Utah 

Give Arizona part of South Utah and New Mexico up to the Arkansas river reservoirs and the Eastern areas of Arizona 

Utah will abandon much of lake Powell and get 100% of flaming gorge 

South Colorado is new west Virginia and the new 50th State we was founded by Robert Ford and Jesse James not Jim Bowie and Davey Crockett 

Blanca peak is Texas's Father!

And we'll draw a straight line through ship rock because it's a volcano unlike Matterhorn new Mexico keeps the south we keep the north 

And no less than half of the Gunnison and Arkansas (all Pueblo county)(New Mexico gets East of Pueblo county) rivers las animas county will be split the east to New Mexico the west to South Colorado at Mesa de Maya and the purgatoire river

Divide up the beef cow Wyoming!

Elevado? Elevar? Or South Colorado maybe? I will consider name suggestions 

Not all treasure is gold and silver mate

How about Panacea the goddess of healing instead of south Colorado?

Davy Jones · · Shiprock, NM · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0
Jack Sparrow wrote:

Not all treasure is gold and silver mate

How about Panacea the goddess of healing instead of south Colorado?

I won't lie I like the name Panacea but as long as you don't take it as a joke or something 

But everything south of book cliffs until pastora peak Utah keeps canyon lands but South Colorado "Panacea" gets arches 

Jeff G · · Colorado · Joined Feb 2006 · Points: 1,345

Davy and Jack should STFU 

Jack Sparrow · · Orlando, FL · Joined Aug 2026 · Points: 0
Jeff G wrote:

Davy and Jack should STFU 

Wel north Colorado would get the southern wind river mountains,100% of medicine bow, part of thunder basin, boysen Pathfinder and Seminoe reservoir, as well as Cheyenne and Casper 

I think Davy got banned for mentioning Nebraska 

Tzilla Rapdrilla · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jan 2006 · Points: 980
Tony B wrote:

Except there are still new routes going up at certain areas in the Estes Valley with some pretty well populated new areas.
And that's 2 reasons why the new book isn't out. Somebody's been really busy and some new area isn't quite done.

That will always be the case, it’s like waiting for the conveyor belt to stop. Do the book or give it over to someone who will

Long Ranger · · Boulder, CO · Joined Jan 2014 · Points: 669

Someone should make a website that's like, "Beyond the Guidebook" 

Brad White · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Sep 2006 · Points: 25

"Bernard should just hand over his info to someone who will actually finish the Estes book. It’s not like there’s any real money involved and maybe hand over the keys to the next generation. That’s what happened in Telluride and there’s an actual nice new guidebook there now."

Or, alternatively someone else could actually go and climb all of the hundreds (or thousands) of routes in the area that Bernard has, explore some of the obscure places that Bernard has, or get to know the area better by developing obscure crags into user friendly climbing areas. And document it all. Like Bernard has.

I don't think Bernard owes anything to anyone in terms of getting a new guidebook published. I've known him for a very long time, and whatever he is saying about this new guidebook and it's dateline, he's not being dishonest or insincere. Bernard is a good, honest guy. He's climbed in the Park and the Estes Park Valley since he was a little boy, and has put out many guidebooks to share his vast knowledge of such a huge and complex area. And my best guess is that he has not made a substantial amount of money for any of it, compared to the time he has spent on these guidebooks. 

I know he's a busy family guy, and if he says that he will put out this guidebook at a particular time, he will. Period. He is in no way the keeper of beta that the rest of us don't have access to.

Dan D · · Colorado · Joined May 2021 · Points: 17
Long Ranger wrote:

Someone should make a website that's like, "Beyond the Guidebook" 

Impossible, people will just flood it with nonsense unrelated to any discussions that will happen

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

Colorado
Post a Reply to "What's up with the RMNP Guidebook?"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community! It's FREE

Already have an account? Login to close this notice.