Tricams - placements possibilities and use cases
|
eli poss wrote: I do agree with you now that I know what you mean by over cammed. We are talking the same thing in different words. Yes in general, I often place them at what you call 0 degrees. They are very stable when set hard. Less so when the fulcrum points opposite the direction of pull, but still not unrealistic to use as long as the placement is careful and set hard. Then they get really stable when the cam shoulders touch the wall the same side as the fulcrum point. My feeling about the loss of stability is that as the fulcrum point moves forward or back from the direction of pull anywhere outside of approximately what you are calling 0 degrees, it loses a lot of outward force in the crack walls since now the fulcrum point is pushing diagonally into and across the crack wall rather than straight down into it. At least until you reach what you call the 90 degree position with the cam shoulders touching the same side of the wall as the fulcrum point. Perhaps this is the same as what you are talking about with the camming angles? |
|
anotherclimber wrote: Yep, agreed. I was just correcting the strength number. |
|
Anything can get welded into a crack, including tricams. I've seen this in vertical cracks, too. |
|
Robert Hall wrote: TriCams work in "solution Pocket" holes when nothing else will fit. Often such "holes" are found on granite friction slab...where's there's nothing else (except a bolt). Thus, even if you don't need them in your "home area" I'd keep 'em and bring 'em along if you head out on friction slab. ^^This. Here are a couple tricams-only placements in NC granite. I don't like carrying unnecessary gear but sometimes these things are lifesavers. |
|
eli poss wrote: I'm saying that most of the time you can get it out with just your fingers by grabbing it from the sides to stop rotation and pulling straight out. Its only if the tricam is really small (black, white), or way deep in the crack that you can't. I do find though that when its way deep in the crack, you tend to have a stable stance to work on it though since the leader wouldn't be able to fidget it back there in the first place from an awkward stance. I was agreeing in the sense that if my fingers don't work for some reason, anotherclimber's method of nut tool under the nose is my preferred method of getting them out. Also that most placements are able to get out one handed. |
|
Alex James wrote: Dunno about you but I have a hard time doing much with my fingers on anything smaller than red tricam. I love my pink but I usually need a nut tool to extract her, unless it's placed in a pocket, which tend to be fairly shallow and outward flaring around here. Maybe I just have sausage fingers, though. |
|
eli poss wrote: yeah pink is trickier. It's normally finger tips and some wiggling. Definitely not as clean as the larger sizes but still doable. |
|
nbrown wrote: I love pictures of Tricam placements and making the placements themselves. There is something so satisfying looking at it and realizing that there is nothing else that would have worked there. eli poss wrote: Dunno about you but I have a hard time doing much with my fingers on anything smaller than red tricam. I love my pink but I usually need a nut tool to extract her, unless it's placed in a pocket, which tend to be fairly shallow and outward flaring around here. Maybe I just have sausage fingers, though.Alex James has it spot on. But yeah, finger size may play into this. 0.50 pink is sometimes questionable for me to get out with fingers too. Especially if it's placed deeper into the crack. For a few sizes up from that if placed deeper into the crack where my whole hand won't fit in that can also still be an issue where the nut tool is required. Black 0.125 absolutely needs the nut tool to tap it loose and hook it out. |
|
I usually carry a pink red and black on every route, barely any weight and can be critical |
|
I really like them actively placed in flares and passively placed behind thinner flakes that would blow out with a cam. |
|
You tricam junkies. I just imagine someone sitting at their keyboard sweating profusely, hand furiously working their......mouse. |
|
Tricams are my personal favourite type of gear. But, I climb at a pretty low level -- I'm not usually leading much harder on gear than a 5.10a. They tend to be a bit more fiddly to place than a cam, and the same to clean, that on higher-end climbing, they're not likely to work nearly as well. At the level I climb, though, where I'll usually have a good stance to place, they'll place well. And I climb a lot of stuff that isn't parallel-sided cracks -- and that is one of the big strengths of Tricams. They can be placed in pockets, horizontals, strange triangular-holes and such where neither a cam nor a nut will do. (Also, they can be placed passively like a nut, and actively in a lot of places a cam would work -- so they act as doubles for both my cams and my nuts on my rack.) |
|
Have to say I haven’t carried tricams since the late nineties. I might still if I lived somewhere different than the PNW where they might still be relevant, but cams and a double set of HB allow offset nuts pretty much covers what you run into out here. |
|
A hopefully helpful suggestion for TriCam aspirants, wonderers, doubters: when climbing a relatively easy multi-pitch, place a fair number of "extra" TriCams and then have a competent follower grade your placements, ideally with accompanying photos as they clean. Based upon my own experiences, you might proceed as follows:
I've been placing TriCams, from 0.75/pink to 5/orange-stamped-riveted-beast, extensively in Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area for the past several years and find them to have limitless possibilities within the Aztec Sandstone. Recently, leading the first pitch of Olive Oil (5.7-PG, 4-5p, Rose Tower), I used a pink TriCam together with a BD x4 "Alien Killer" to render the first pitch, and hence the entire climb, 5.7-G instead of -PG. My lead climbing ethic was most informed by guide Marc Chauvin back in 2009 when he taught me that the first rule of lead climbing is do NOT fall. While I've treated myself to a good number of sphincter-tightening, sewing machine moments while leading, I've thus far been fortunate in being 100% compliant with that blunt-yet-sublime "Chauvin-ism" yet whenever I've scrutinized my TriCam placements during exercises like those of the four bullet points above, I have gained in overall confidence that were I to sustain a leader fall, I hope it will be with a TriCam as the top link in my chain, as a well-placed one is IME highly unlikely to begin opening the zipper of catastrophe, and a reasonably set one that is guarded by a fully-extended 120cm draw with a rope-end clove stands a pretty good chance as well. |
|
Where have you gone ~ oh so strong one'? Healyje wrote: Have to say I have carried tricams since the late nineties. I might still if I lived somewhere different than the PNW where they might still be relevant, but cams and a double set of HB allow offset nuts pretty much covers what you run into out here. I wish it was a clearer picture, but... Customized (Filed down) Pink & Red Tri-Cams helped to open up the horizontally tiered overhangs in the gunks |
|
|
|
|
|
Luke Lozier wrote: A hopefully helpful suggestion for TriCam aspirants, wonderers, doubters: when climbing a relatively easy multi-pitch, place a fair number of "extra" TriCams and then have a competent follower grade your placements, ideally with accompanying photos as they clean. Based upon my own experiences, you might proceed as follows: Curious, why the clove hitch on the rope-end biner? To prevent cross/gate loading? My free climbing rack (started in 1992) was stolen two years ago in Yosemite (along with some other gear). I do still have three 30 year old Tricams (pink, red, brown) but they've reached retirement age due to sling degradation (some with duct tape as sling stiffener; I used to tape strips of milk jug plastic to the slings to provide some backbone). Tricams have always intrigued me. Their biggest downside is inept partners whose mechanical aptitude is challenged in placing or removing them and partners who because of that - or for other reasons - are averse/biased against them. I respect Tricams' ability to produce reliably bomber placements (the Gunks is my local area so there's a traditional history of Tricam usage and a deserved respect, but I mostly climb out West), their capacity to protect certain unique rock features that nothing else can, as contributing to a sleeker, more compact, lighter weight, and less expensive rack esp. when needing to double up or triple up on cams, how placing them from good stances or as part of a belay anchor permits me to conserve my rapid deploy cams for the more urgent, demanding, or even desperate placements on the pitch, and finally I like how they challenge me to think inventively to place ... part of the mentally stimulating and satisfying mechanical aptitude component of trad climbing. Typically I'd carry pink/red/brown (sometimes blue). I'm getting a new rack together (weird to buy a ton of cams and biners all at once) and I need to buy a set of black/pink/red/brown/(possibly blue). I'll check out the Evos. The black I've never used and am eager to try. If anyone has a set for cheap let me know. |
|
They fit where nothing else will! Usually carry four, often place at least one. They can take the place of larger nuts if you are a weight weenie. Great for anchors where you have more time and may be low on gear. |