Anyone can climb V10/5.14-
|
|
Bill Schickwrote: Especially if your socks are on the wrong feet |
|
|
abandon moderation wrote: I got my gym membership comped. i signed up with lattice. Its 90 a month. I havnt started yet due to a naggling injury from a work accident. Going basically from climbing 3-4 days a week to not being able to at all. |
|
|
Bill Schickwrote: Sure! I’m very aware of it. And I’m ok with my choices. I also believe that I can run a marathon. I’m making no statement about the time I can do it in, but I firmly believe that I can... I have walked the distance while hiking, with a pack, in one push, so I’m sure I can beat that time, at least. :) but I hate running, so I never will. Also very ok with that choice. |
|
|
Lena chitawrote: This was mostly in reference that no matter how much experience, knowledge or ability someone on mountain project will call you a Gumby. Side story that I debated on posting to here but I got called an incapable climber in a Facebook group for asking people to not top rope on rap rings. They then said anchors were not expensive and that I clearly have never bought any after I posted a picture of a box of rap rings on my floor. |
|
|
Well, I'm glad that Mike got something out of what I wrote. Too bad you did not read between the lines. |
|
|
Mark Frumkinwrote: Well, I'm glad that Mike got something out of what I wrote. Too bad you did not read between the lines. I completely agree with ya Mark. I'm just goofin off as this entire thread is goofy as fuck. |
|
|
I'd guess you'd be very hard-pressed to find a 5.14 climber with much of a follow/top-rope vs. lead grade gap in safe terrain. I'd argue anyone with a gap of 2 letter grades or more between their hardest top rope and hardest lead almost certainly has mental issues, not strength, as their greatest weakness holding them back. This actually includes top-roping ability as the sort of anxiety that holds people back from leading where the fall may be big but safe tends to also affect top-roping climbing in less obvious but still-important ways. |
|
|
Sarah Zubrin wrote: hmmm I think that this is dependent on a variety of factors as stated above. There are some climbs that women will never be able to do as well or easily. Look at the disparity in styles of climbing already. I feel pretty confident that if I climbed everyday, ate a boatload of protein, and got lots of good rest that I could climb a 5.14. Then we go into- am I leading, following, or straight up top roping this climb. I can top rope a heck of a lot more challenging climbs than I can lead (fear, experience, etc.) Also I could probably flail on a 5.14 and top out is that climbing? What is your definition of success or climbing? I think though if you are sound body/mind and spend 6 months training every day and push yourself harder than you ever have you could..... is it lazy to not? I don’t think so. For the purpose of this conversation (which started based on the statement in a podcast) “climbing a grade” means redpointing A climb of the grade. Not toproping. Not doing individual moves. But also, nobody says that you have to do a SPECIFIC 5.14. Of course different routes will play to different people’s strengths.
|
|
|
6 months of training hard.... |
|
|
It's hard to understand the difference between the top 5% and 1%. |
|
|
If its an "Average Climber" then doesn't it mean they climb like the average person? |
|
|
All I can say is the people who thought they couldn't get from 5.10 to 5.14 with 6 months of training didn't get to 5.14 in 6 months |
|
|
Mark E Dixonwrote: All I can say is the people who thought they couldn't get from 5.10 to 5.14 with 6 months of training didn't get to 5.14 in 6 months 100% not even if they boosted their T to some other PED and followed a 100% custom plan (Edit) the skill aspect is overlooked. |
|
|
Mark E Dixonwrote: All I can say is the people who thought they couldn't get from 5.10 to 5.14 with 6 months of training didn't get to 5.14 in 6 months And the ones who thought they could and really really tried hard didn't get there either |
|
|
Mark E Dixonwrote: All I can say is the people who thought they couldn't get from 5.10 to 5.14 with 6 months of training didn't get to 5.14 in 6 months You just wait, 50 years from now, if you don't make it to 5.14 in 6 months, you would fail your junior team tryouts. :) |
|
|
Lena, that be true but how many wrecked bodies will be left behind? |
|
|
if you're going to make an omelette... |
|
|
Mark Frumkinwrote: Lena, that be true but how many wrecked bodies will be left behind? As many as with other competitive sports? Competition climbing is certainly heading that way. |
|
|
I tried damn hard for along time. I peaked out around V8-V9 and 5.13b-5.13c, blowing a finger every time I got up into that range. I was a weekend warrior, working full time, started at the age of 20, and fully committed to the sport doing specific training, weight loss, good diet, cross training, and all the things. I definitely had a finger issue that kept me from breaking through the 5.14a grade. It was a different finger or location on the finger each time, spread over years. I just couldn't physically do it. It was damn fun trying, but once I hit 39 and started working another 5.13b and blew a finger again, I just started surfing. I grew up very athletic and motivated, didn't pick up climbing until college, and tried damn hard at it. I believe that Horst estimated the average Joe could hit 5.13. I'd go with his assessment. That was my experience, and after teaching and mentoring climbing and watching many other people who were wildly driven hit a mid-5.13 ceiling like me that seems to be a pretty big ceiling for the average climber. |
|
|
Lena chitawrote: heading that way? It has been there for a bit and is likely worse than many sports. |




