New route ethics

Curious about the ethics of bolting a line that has an existing anchor, but no lead bolts and isn’t idocumented anywhere as a TR.  Is it appropriate to bolt, lead, and claim as an FA?

You might start by attempting to identify who placed the bolts and ask them. It could also simply be a gear route. If there's a bolted anchor on top, there's a pretty good chance you're not first.

No opportunities for gear. The line requires bolts, or a solo.

Is it about the climb or claiming the FA? I think the question really revolves around whether you are doing a service to the climbing 'community' or just propping your own ego.

Benjamin Chapman wrote: Curious about the ethics of bolting a line that has an existing anchor, but no lead bolts and isn’t idocumented anywhere as a TR.  Is it appropriate to bolt, lead, and claim as an FA?

No

Not really.... but you can tell the age of the bolts at the top, if it’s somebody’s new project or long abandoned TR. .... if you finish it, make a good sport climb of it then claim the FA if you wish.
Is this yet another squeeze job at Texas Canyon?

No, the FA has already happen and its likely they already named it.  Just climb and have fun.  Be thankful for the bolted anchors.

Not knowing the location, there might be local rules regarding bolting.  Some parks "don't allow" it.