Why is Arcteryx so expensive?
|
|
What if excess accumulation of capital for the transaction to acquire their goods was environmentally wasteful? |
|
|
Marc801 C wrote: Not really. The counterfeit stuff is so poorly done its really on the buyer... |
|
|
NateGfunk wrote: It’s more complex than that: https://www.mountainproject.com/forum/topic/114084263/fake-arcteryx-on-ebay-gamma-lt#ForumMessage-116229648 |
|
|
NateGfunk wrote: If you don't have an eye for details (which many people don't) it can be easy. |
|
|
Some of this is personal taste but I'd definitely say arcteryx is at the top or very close when it comes to style, fit, function, and durability. Maybe Patagonia is close but seriously, OR doesn't even come close...look at the stitching for one. Does Patagonia even match Arc'teryx stitch count per inch? |
|
|
Lena chita wrote: Wife liked the one I grabbed on sale so much, she made me get another for when the first one fails. I wear it to work all the time, but does show some piling where my backpack straps rest over the trapezius muscles (not readily observable touch by someone at non-intimate distances). |
|
|
Most of the goods come from china. no thanks. |
|
|
Jeffrey Constine wrote: Most of the goods come from china. no thanks. What wrong with goods from China? |
|
|
Lena chita wrote: The funny thing is I actually do occasionally forget to change or don't have time so I have more than once taken laps on an offwidth in button down shirts |
|
|
This "Jacket" is out of control. There is just absolutely no way they can justify that price to anyone other than some gullible yuppie. |
|
|
Danger-Russ Gordon wrote: This "Jacket" is out of control. There is just absolutely no way they can justify that price to anyone other than some gullible yuppie. Lol to each their own I guess |
|
|
I happen to have picked up one of their 1000$ Veilance jackets at a used gear sale for 160$. It's nice and it looks good, but it isn't MUCH better than a 250$ Atom LT. That being said the Atom LT is an incredible piece of gear and is one of my all-time favorite jackets. |
|
|
Danger-Russ Gordon wrote: This "Jacket" is out of control. There is just absolutely no way they can justify that price to anyone other than some gullible yuppie. I love it. I bet the margin they make on these is absurd - imagine what they'd charge for their functional stuff if they didn't have these! Also, since I moved to Switzerland I've been blown away how many people here use high-end gear. I climb with the equivalent of dirtbag climbers here sometimes (not that there is a direct equivalent - people are always so fashionable) and they all use Arc'teryx or Mammut harnesses, shells, pants, etc. They love to pay for quality. |
|
|
Sportmachen in Europe is no joke! You should see how decked-out the people are at my gym in Berlin. You don't just go for a hike or a quick run after work. Doing Sport is a distinct effort. |
|
|
Yes Arc’teryx is expensive. More so than comparable pieces from other companies? Not so much. Like others have said, Arc’teryx is only in the high end market, while other quality brands (Patagonia, etc.) make budget-oriented jackets in addition to professional-grade. Personally, I own a number of arc pieces and they consistently fit me MUCH better than similar offerings from other brands. That said, I don’t think I could bring myself to pay full price for any of it, but that’s usually not necessary. Shop sales/clearance and it will be well worth the investment. |
|
|
Tim Opsahl wrote: I would assume they need an absolutely stellar customer service team and take little complaint for repairs at the cost, and thus the idea is that you're buying something that you'll use for 10 years. I bought an Arcteryx piece on sale and love it, but don't think it's uniquely different than anything else. I recently sent an 8 year old jacket back for a seam repair, and instead was given a new jacket when they discovered an issue with the gore tex delaminating in spots. I spent another $70 to upgrade to a burlier jacket. The process took about 8 weeks, but I thought it was handled well throughot and definitely can't complain about the outcome. |
|
|
Arcteryx soft goods are high quality, both in design and materials and can't be beat for skiing. For climbing I like their light weight windbreaker and puffy. Only drawback is that my Arcteryx stuff never wears out. Yes, you have to pay up to get the best. Or get a pro deal. |
|
|
I bought the the lighter weight version of Acrteryx's first gen top of the line mountaineering jacket when I was about 26 years old. I used the hell out of that jacket. 30+ days a year skiing between backcountry and lift served. About 10 days a year ice climbing. One or two big peaks per year. I took it with me as my rain jacket for spring and fall backpacking trips. I finally retired it after catching a branch skiing through tight trees two years ago at age 47. The fit of the jacket was excellent. You don't understand the amount of thought Arcteryx puts into a piece of clothing until you get out and use it. My jacket moved with me in a way that never hindered my movement. It kept me dry in extremely adverse conditions. It held up to hard use for over 20 years. Arcteryx fixed the zipper for me and I still have the piece as a back up jacket. My new jacket? Arcteryx's top of the line ski shell. I fully expect that this shell will last for the rest of my life. Arcteryx gear is totally worth the price if the following applies: |
|
|
The Veilance line is for rubes and fools easily parted with their money. Comparing it to other technical gear offerings is apples to oranges. Yes it's crazy, but good for atx trying to capture that "outdoor fashion" segment. I mean, why not? You don't have to spend 1k on an atom LT, so don't worry about it. Maybe that extra money they're making will translate into better designed technical pieces for you and me...who knows. |
|
|
Thanks for all the great answers and insights. I really appreciate it. Wanted to reply yesterday but ran into the "Post limits" curse of MP. |






