Seven-year-old Sterling rope (never used) - okay to climb on?
|
|
Safety question here. I have a 9.8 mm Sterling Bi Velocity rope (70 m) which I received as a gift in January of 2011. Shortly after I got the rope, I developed a serious chronic pain condition that prevented me from rock climbing for the next six and a half years :'( . After all that time I have finally made dramatic improvements and am starting to climb easy routes again. For the past seven years the rope has been stored in a closet in my parent's house - it wasn't perfectly coiled (I would say half-coiled half messy heap), but was not exposed to any dramatic temperatures or anything else. |
|
|
Absolutely 100% fine. |
|
|
It's fine. |
|
|
Sterling thinks you'll be okay too. Up to 10 year lifespan if rarely used https://sterlingrope.com/journal/136-four-simple-rope-care-techniques |
|
|
Does anyone know why companies even give these age-based requirement criteria? I don't know of any evidence of the common rope fibers degrading in reasonable storage over human lifetimes, and most forms of damage seem to be detectable via inspection. If you want to read something really dry, you can check out Fiber Rope Inspection and Retirement Criteria which talks about this in painful detail. There may be something I don't know, but it seems like educating on how to perform regular inspections would be more accurate and keep customers safer. Maybe it's just to sell more ropes? |
|
|
David Kerkeslager wrote: It´s a requirement of the certification legislation to give an expected lifespan and climbing gear being what it is effectively we just pick a number from a hat. Somewhere on the internet there is a table of various companies ideas about how long it should be showing the considerable variation possible! For the OP;- many of us are climbing on ropes that have been used for seven years or more. |
|
|
As other's have said it will work just dandy....climb on brother, congrats on getting back in the game. |
|
|
Jim Titt wrote: "Certification legislation" meaning the law? Or standards set by climbing organizations? (I don't know how these rules are made/enforced, I'm curious.) |
|
|
David Kerkeslager wrote: For sale in Europe all climbing equipment must be certified to legally required standards (the EN number) and to qualify for the UIAA Safety label the equipment must have also been certified to this. |
|
|
Shannon Osaka wrote: Welcome back to climbing! |
|
|
B Owens wrote: +1 I have back pain on and off for years from injury. Good to hear you feel up to climbing. |
|
|
In the US it has to do with liability. Lawyers and insurance companies and such. |
|
|
I would say it's totally fine to climb on! |
|
|
It's unsafe, please send to me quick |
|
|
David Kerkeslager wrote: Rope fibers won't degrade in that 10 year period but the rope itself may lose some ability to stretch and absorb impact. So for toproping the shelf life may be quite longer but for lead climbing it may be an issue. |
|
|




