Open hand training advice
|
|
It seems that when I boulder at my limit (which is only V3 or so) I end up crimping a lot. The effects this has on my finger joints is fairly significant pain, which seems to last 10 days or more, but does go away completely in time. This may or may not have to do with my current 220lbs of body weight, or less than perfect footwork and body tension. But as those things aren't likely to change much any time soon, I'm interested in trying to adopt open hand technique for the majority of my climbing. At one point I was open handing quite a lot but I seem to have lost that instinct in favor of crimping. |
|
|
After I injured a finger( not a pulley tear), I couldn't full crimp with out immediate pain. I had to focus on each hand placement and make sure I didn't ingage the full crimp. I had to reduce the grades of routes problems I was trying but was back up to par in no time, but able to hold on with the open grip to holds I once had to crimp. Just practice is what I can recommend. Maybe hit the hangboard on the larger holds and just work open grip as an alternative. |
|
|
so this may sound odd but honestly everytime my fingers get tweaky I tend to take a couple of weeks and hangboard instead of climbing. |
|
|
How long have you been climbing and how frequently do you climb? Tendons take much longer to develop the same level of strength that your muscles can get to rather quickly. So, if you are climbing too frequently too soon, you can cause an overuse injury in your finger tendons. |
|
|
Thanks forthe advice, guys. |
|
|
- Hangboard open handed to get used, and stronger at, that position. |
|
|
Daniel, that actually makes perfect sense. Most finger injuries are caused by dynamic loading/shock loading, which happens when you either make a dynamic move to a shitty hold or if your foot slips and you unexpectedly fully load your fingers. Hangboarding is a controlled, static exercise in which you precisely tune the level and duration of the load. It also makes sense that (moderate) hanging would help with tweaked fingers by stimulating blood flow. I've tried going cold turkey and ceasing climbing altogether before and actually found it made tendon/joint pain worse. I've also heard of many people receiving similar PT recommendations as long as you didn't completely rupture the tendon. |
|
|
Okay, I'll buy '9 out of 10', start hangboarding with open hand grips a little, and see if it will help relieve some of the soreness I currently have (which has been on going for about 8 days now). |
|
|
Mathias wrote:this particular pain from crimping is definitely a joint pain, in my second finger joints. When you do your "crimp" grip, are you putting your thumb over your index / "pointing" finger? |
|
|
kenr wrote: When you do your "crimp" grip, are you putting your thumb over your index / "pointing" finger? or Not? When you say "second" finger, do you mean your index / "pointing" finger (so counting your thumb as your first "finger") -- or do you mean your middle finger? . (The index/pointing is often especially stressed by thumb-over crimping). Or you mean the second _joint_ (counting inward from the tip of the finger, or outward from the palm?) Second joint of every finger? or only some? If counting joints inward from the tip, it's the _first_ joint (DIP) which the crimp grip is often believed to put very high stress on, not so much the second joint (PIP). Ken It is the second joint in all fingers that have pain, to varying degrees. There is some discomfort in the first joints of some of my fingers, but to a lesser degree. So all the PIPs, and some of the DIPs to a lesser extent. I never put my thumb over my index finger because it feels like I'm just asking to damage something. Oddly, my index fingers hurt the least. |
|
|
Mathias wrote:It is the second joint in all fingers that have pain If the second joints (PIP) in all cases have the bigger pain and problem than the first joints (DIP), then it's not obvious how crimping is causing the problem. |
|
|
Mathias wrote:This may or may not have to do with my current 220lbs of body weight, or less than perfect footwork and body tension. But as those things aren't likely to change much any time soon Why not try to improve your footwork/technique? You could potentially make some rapid gains this way. I can't say for sure because I've never climbed with you, but if V3 is your current limit there's a good chance technique is your greatest unrealized potential right now. |
|
|
kenr wrote: If the second joints (PIP) in all cases have the bigger pain and problem than the first joints (DIP), then it's not obvious how crimping is causing the problem. Still ... you making a decision to climb without crimp grip might help, because you won't be able to succeed on routes with smaller edge holds -- so maybe you fingers won't get injured because you won't be climbing as hard. It's a popular trend to believe that crimping is bad for you, but top climbers use crimp grip lots, in the videos I watch. I do think that people who do not carefully progressively _train_ crimp grip, but then use it suddenly on hard moves on small edges -- because it's what works -- are in special danger of injury. Especially with your body weight, I suggest that the real safety technique is _measured_ progressive incremental training, not some simplistic magic formula of "always avoid this" or always do that. Ken I hear what you're saying, Ken. And it's not a case of swearing off crimps, just trying to get used to using open hands more. I used to use open hand grips quite a lot, but since my wrist injury I've noticed I barely do it at all. Part of that is likely because for a while slopers open hand grips hurt the wrist, but that's not nearly as much of an issue now. Unfortunately crimping seems to have stuck. Crimps used to be a fairly rare thing for me and actually felt quite uncomfortable. will ar wrote: Why not try to improve your footwork/technique? You could potentially make some rapid gains this way. I can't say for sure because I've never climbed with you, but if V3 is your current limit there's a good chance technique is your greatest unrealized potential right now. Will, believe me, I try to do this every time I climb. This became my focus when I started climbing again after I hurt my wrist and I believe it's better than it was. I'm using much less upper body strength as a result and seeking out smaller foothold on route and problems below my limit. But I know there's lots of room for improvement so I continue to try. I particularly value it when I can get feedback from someone watching me, but this isn't always a possibility. |
|
|
Hangboarding open handed helps, as would developing good core engagement/body control in genera (and somewhat counter intuitively, more dynamic movement). But half/full crimps are actually very useful, especially for the lower hand on lock offs & making long moves, although open hand is used more for the upper hand. |
|
|
reboot wrote:Hangboarding open handed helps, as would developing good core engagement/body control in genera (and somewhat counter intuitively, more dynamic movement). But half/full crimps are actually very useful, especially for the lower hand on lock offs & making long moves, although open hand is used more for the upper hand. I guess what I'm trying to say is don't drink the open hand only kool aid (I did & now I have pretty weak closed grip that I need to train). There isn't one way you are supposed to grab the hold, open grip is more directional than closed grip & that doesn't always work when making a move. That said, people w/ poor core engagement/body control tend to over-utilize closed grips because they don't have enough directional stability. Funny you mention the lower hand grip with big reaches because I was struggling with doing that open hand today, so I see exactly what you mean. It's welcome advice to keep my crimp strength up because I'd be kicking it myself if I let it regress much even if I'd prefer to use them less. I also see what you mean about open hand being more directional than crimping. |
|
|
Although I've seen people climb some pretty hard stuff in Moccasyms and Mythos, there's going to be an upper threshold when it comes to bouldering, and I'd say V3 is pretty close. Have you considered that your insistence on wearing non-aggressive shoes is forcing you to rely too much on your upper body and prevented you from developing more advanced footwork? You might find that more aggressive/pointy shoes will help you use your feet more. |
|
|
Ted Pinson wrote:Although I've seen people climb some pretty hard stuff in Moccasyms and Mythos, there's going to be an upper threshold when it comes to bouldering, and I'd say V3 is pretty close. Have you considered that your insistence on wearing non-aggressive shoes is forcing you to rely too much on your upper body and prevented you from developing more advanced footwork? You might find that more aggressive/pointy shoes will help you use your feet more. I've absolutely considered that. And honestly I'm pretty okay with V3. I mentioned bouldering grades because that's what I've been doing a lot recently. I'm far more interested in trad. I just haven't been able to get out for much besides bouldering sessions and the gym recently. |
|
|
Ted Pinson wrote:Although I've seen people climb some pretty hard stuff in Moccasyms and Mythos, there's going to be an upper threshold when it comes to bouldering, and I'd say V3 is pretty close. Have you considered that your insistence on wearing non-aggressive shoes is forcing you to rely too much on your upper body and prevented you from developing more advanced footwork? You might find that more aggressive/pointy shoes will help you use your feet more. This may be just me, but I find the opposite to be true: I use my feet more, and generally much better, when the shoes are comfortable. This is based on my experience with my 5.10 Coyotes, which I can easily wear all day long, and my Evolve Shamans, which I have a hard time walking in and get uncomfortable after 1-2 pitches. |
|
|
Ted Pinson wrote:Although I've seen people climb some pretty hard stuff in Moccasyms and Mythos, there's going to be an upper threshold when it comes to bouldering, and I'd say V3 is pretty close. Have you considered that your insistence on wearing non-aggressive shoes is forcing you to rely too much on your upper body and prevented you from developing more advanced footwork? You might find that more aggressive/pointy shoes will help you use your feet more. While aggressive shoes can help you climb better, a friend of mine boulders v6-7 in moccasyms. So, I don't think V3 is even close to an "upper threshold" for bouldering in non-aggressive shoes. Shoes probably aren't the limiting factor in the low grades anyway, footwork is. |
|
|
Ted Pinson wrote:Although I've seen people climb some pretty hard stuff in Moccasyms and Mythos, there's going to be an upper threshold when it comes to bouldering, and I'd say V3 is pretty close. Have you considered that your insistence on wearing non-aggressive shoes is forcing you to rely too much on your upper body and prevented you from developing more advanced footwork? You might find that more aggressive/pointy shoes will help you use your feet more. Sorry Ted, I disagree with the first sentence. Less aggressive shoes can get on much tougher problems than a V3. |
|
|
It's funny how this thread has become about footwork, but I'll go with it. |




