Belay system for trad/multi-pitch?
|
|
Please critique on the belay/rappel system we are using. Thank you in advance!
on descent:
My motivations. I know it's a very sport-influenced system. Easy to work a hard pitch with Gri-Gri. On descent, lowered climber ensures that next anchor can be reached and manages the rope if needed. The bad is that requires both climbers to be "in" on the system. Also, Gri-Gri is heavy. |
|
|
I would just inquire as to whether you are aware of the way that a grigri can increase force loads on a piece of protection during a fall. Or are we talking sport multipitch? |
|
|
The Grigri is not meant as a rappel device. Bring an atc. |
|
|
I don't understand why, on descent, the first climber is "tied into both ends of the rope"? |
|
|
interesting thoughts from a guy with some experience |
|
|
Tug wrote:The Grigri is not meant as a rappel device. Bring an atc. I would tend to agree with this. Not only that, but you can only attach one strand to the gri-gri, and lowering with an ATC in guide mode can be a pain. |
|
|
Agree w/ the last post. I've taken to this system for almost all applications save instances where there is marginal pro on the route. I trust my main partners to belay me w/ an ATC but also like the security of knowing that in the advent of some crazy scenario (falling rock breaks hand/lands on helmet/etc) there is some added security. |
|
|
Bring two gri, ditch the atc. Simul rap pending it's a solid anchor. If it's shabby, back it up and tie off a strand to single rap. Second party removes backup and single strand raps. Repeat all the way down. |
|
|
DevinLane wrote:Bring two gri, ditch the atc. Simul rap pending it's a solid anchor. If it's shabby, back it up and tie off a strand to single rap. Second party removes backup and single strand raps. Repeat all the way down. Nothing's better than long raps with the gri. Some might argue it's not the ideal novice setup. ^^^ Yup. Rarely climb with an ATC anymore (this is excepting alpine climbing, different beast...) just a GriGri each for leader and follower. Learn and get comfortable with the biner block, simul-rap, and counterweight techniques and descending is just as quick and easier. Rapping on the GriGri will probably decrease it's life span a little bit, but there is nothing inherently unsafe about it. Rapping single strand also has the added benefit of giving you a contingency strand if you know how to use it. |
|
|
I really like the combo of having one Climbing Technology AlpineUp, and one ATC Guide. Belay the leader with the autolocking(technically assisted locking) AlpineUp, leader takes the ATC Guide up with them and autoblock belays the follower up to them, and then repeat with the leader always belayed on the AlpineUp. Then for raps, first rappeller takes the AlpineUp(autolocking on rappel) and fireman belays the second follower. |
|
|
Dylan B. wrote:Get an Alpine Smart. +1 |
|
|
I'm fine with your ascent system. I'm a recent convert to using my grigri trad climbing - i've had one for years but didn't use it much, i thought it was just added weight, but I now find I like the added security against rock-fall, narcolepsy, etc. I don't see that as a huge risk though, and am fine with being belayed with a non-assisted device. The most important factor is the person using the device. |
|
|
I agree with RDW and have a few points to add: - second rappeller gets down to anchor and clips into opposite 2 strands of the quad (where the super shiney locker is in the pic).. this way, both climbers can move around without pulling the other off balance. With this setup, you can say goodbye to the dreaded biner-pinch, so long as you clip your quad above the chains on the hanger There is the potential for extension with a quad, but this application is totally acceptable with bomber 2-bolt anchors according to the American Mountain Guides Association. |
|
|
FrankPS wrote:I don't understand why, on descent, the first climber is "tied into both ends of the rope"? Allow him to pick the optimal way to manage both strands on the way down. Larry S wrote: then your rope is running over everything the whole way down. Probably better then having rope rub over an edge in one point. IMHO if sharp lips/edges are involved, it's safer to lower then rap. |
|
|
SXL wrote: Probably better then having rope rub over an edge in one point. IMHO if sharp lips/edges are involved, it's safer to lower then rap. I am not looking to change the whole system. Trying to get ideas if I can improve it without adding extra gear or steps. At least in the places I've climb, the rap anchors are usually set back from the lip a bit or on ledges where they are convenient, so if you're setting up just to lower, you're either running the loaded line over the lip, or you're anchoring one person in so that they're perched on the lip and lowering off their harness, which sounds really fun since the person being lowered has to downclimb to get beneith you. Either way, it's putting more wear on your rope then just rappelling. |
|
|
Dirtbag's system is [one of] the best set-up(s) with the small exception of the PAS; girth hitch the sling through your tie-in points because the belay loop is non-reinforced nylon so it is made for metal only. unless it's reinforced like on your tie-in points, nylon on nylon is bad as the friction can saw through the belay loop. |
|
|
Larry S wrote: Either way, it's putting more wear on your rope then just rappelling. Wear on rope is not a consideration. I go through a few ropes a year. Rope being cut over a sharp edge would be a problem. Larry S wrote: I agree with what dirtbag said above - which i'll paraphrase as - Lowering should be the exception used to abate special risks, not the rule. Would like to discuss that. My arguments for lowering:
|
|
|
In addition to the cons posted above; |
|
|
"I trust my main partners to belay me w/ an ATC but also like the security of knowing that in the advent of some crazy scenario (falling rock breaks hand/lands on helmet/etc) there is some added security." |
|
|
SXL wrote:* Leader is always belayed with a Gri-Gri If you remove the word ALWAYS from your post you put yourself in a much better position. So often the answer is "it depends." I am okay with my partner using a gri gri, so long as they understand that there is no slip with the device and he/she can provide a dynamic belay if the situation dictates. SXL wrote:get the ropes down quickly and without tangles I would argue that competent party can get their ropes down and have the 2nd person rapping using commonly practiced rope management and rappel techniques more quickly SXL wrote:easy for a person lowered to look around I'm able to look around quite well while rapping myself, and I can go faster because I'm controlling the speed and have a better view of the terrain I'm descending. SXL wrote:easy for a person lowered pendulum if needed This is just as easy while on rappel, especially if you use an autoblock (I rarely do) SXL wrote:if lowered too far, can climb back while on belay If you are rapping instead of being lowered, there's less of a chance you'll go too far. If you do go too far, you can batman the rope as long as it's not a free hanging rappel. If it's free hanging, you can prussik the rope. You brought your prussiks I hope? |
|
|
Arguments against lowering are convincing enough. My partner/mentor is the main source of this system. He prefers lowering the first climber, direct off the harness. Has to do with some accident he was involved years ago. I am going to discuss with him. |




