A quick mountain project question
|
|
I was looking around on the different destination areas and found some stuff that made me think of this. |
|
|
You're right in principle: you should get more points for better content. We've been toying with algorithms that take that into account (such as using the number of "great" ratings a page gets), but haven't implemented anything yet. |
|
|
I don't think you should get any points without a picture |
|
|
Pics or it didn't happen |
|
|
3rd the Pics request, gotta have'em! |
|
|
I think points are just an anachronism left over from the early days when it actually was an incentive to get climbingboulder.com started. I'd love to see them vanish entirely since the site has already reached critical mass for contributions. |
|
|
Andrew Gram wrote:I think points are just an anachronism left over from the early days when it actually was an incentive to get climbingboulder.com started. I'd love to see them vanish entirely since the site has already reached critical mass for contributions. Agreed. |
|
|
Bobby Hanson wrote: Agreed. Thirded. |
|
|
What are points? And how many does it take to get a free pizza? |
|
|
Marc H wrote:how many does it take to get a free pizza? --Marc agreed! |
|
|
First one to 1,000,000 gets a used- but still in good shape, chalkbag. Some dirtbag stole the brush for his teeth, but there's still a little chalk left. |
|
|
Points? What is this, rc.com? |
|
|
JML wrote:What is this, rc.com? A low-rent site that exceeds the acceptable maximum of gumbies. |
|
|
I agree with everyone who posted up. |




