Have Rope, will Tyrol...
|
|
Guys, |
|
|
how about a tyrol from tucson to boulder? i hate to spend all that money on airfare. |
|
|
|
|
|
Very cool thought, Chris. |
|
|
shawn is correct. at any given time i have about a half dozen or so ropes i use for fixing or to leave for tyrols etc. Your static line can be used definately! (in my experience, static lines work much better, and are a helluva lot easier to tighten than dynamic lines. when dynamic ropes get wet the tyrol sags obnoxiously. even though a trick is to soak em in the creek first then stretch em...) for example, eventually i would like to replace the Armory/Primo tyrol in CCC with a fat static line (like the one on Creekside), along with the grooved hardware on the bolts. |
|
|
Justin Cantrall wrote:I can't resist... who doesnt feel like that when they zip across a tyrol? seriously! |
|
|
WiledHorse wrote: but now that i think of it, i think a good system is to have the static line as the tyrol with a dynamic line strung as backup. -darren (outted as a tyrol fairy) ok, fairy, assuming adequate anchors, what do you get out of the system that you wouldn't already have with a mainline in good condition? |
|
|
Buff Johnson wrote: ok, fairy, assuming adequate anchors, what do you get out of the system that you wouldn't already have with a mainline in good condition? In other words, if you can fail a mainline in good condition with bomber anchors, what will that secondary line provide? ha! youre correct. you dont really get anything out of it other than some kind of sense of security i suppose. i have heard that the creekside one is "sketchy" bc its only one rope. but seriously, if you break a static line, the biner your attached to, pull the bolts, or uproot a tree, you have bigger problems and probably shouldnt be climbing! |
|
|
right. |
|
|
Buff Johnson wrote:right. There's no problem with Creekside, unless the line itself needs replacement, or the tree has a problem. It's just the exposure. its in good shape. the tree climb is getting a little more difficult though, some holds have come off ;) |
|
|
Geir Hundal wrote:how about a tyrol from tucson to boulder? i hate to spend all that money on airfare. It's been tried. The elevation gain made it too pumpy. But the zip-line back...that was spectacular! |
|
|
It would fabulous to get some lines in the SSV outside lyons. Great climbing in that area and crossing the creek is really tuff to do. (Most of it is class five rapids). |
|
|
what would really b wild is a spires line; |
|
|
Yep, I would help with the SSV project. It needs it badly. |
|
|
Bruno Hache and I have done tyrolean maintenance in Boulder Canyon over that past few years -- Avalon, Cob Rock, Tonnere Tower, Sleeping Beauty, and Sherwood Forest in particular. I think we have enough static rope (donated by the Colorado Mountain Club) to meet our immediate needs. So if others can use static rope in Clear Creek Canyon or S. St. Vrain Canyon, please take Chris up on his offer. |
|
|
Ron, I don't climb enough in Boulder Canyon to know how needed additional tyroleans are. But does your post mean that chance is gone for the season? What about crossing at an established tyrolean and then hiking a mile or two to another desired point? (Of course it's easy for me to ask about someone else' time and labor.) But is that strategy not part of how it gets done? |
|
|
Shawn Mitchell wrote:Ron, I don't climb enough in Boulder Canyon to know how needed additional tyroleans are. But does your post mean that chance is gone for the season? What about crossing at an established tyrolean and then hiking a mile or two to another desired point? (Of course it's easy for me to ask about someone else' time and labor.) But is that strategy not part of how it gets done? As I think it out, it might be useful to clarify what I envision: one person hikes one side, while another parks on the other. Then, one throws a rock and string across, to pull the rope, and so on. I suppose that's possible, Shawn -- but it would be a lot of work. Not only the hiking, but bushwhacking along the creek -- there usually are no paths that follow the creek. Bushwhacking a mile or two would be pretty brutal. You can do this if you like, but it's more efficient to put up tyroleans while you still can wade the creek. If someone really wants a new tyrolean somewhere -- go for it using your technique; but I'll pass, thanks. |
|
|
Wow, you sure put a lot of work into the crossings, and they are free to the public? : ) I'd probably ride the Tyrol just for fun on my way to work if I lived there. I've climbed in your neck of the woods quite a few times, but haven't crossed via the Tyrol yet. The only zip-line I've ever been on was over the Mendoza River in Argentina a couple of years ago, which was a beautiful ride. We have a new zip-line just outside of Vegas in Boulder City at Bootleg Canyon, but it's an expensive tourist trap. They advertise it as "It's a ZipLine on Steroids!" |
|
|
I have a really old, single buckle Chiounard harness I'm just dying to try out on a tyrol! |
|
|
Dirty Gig -- the tyrol is one of the coolest applications of solving a technical mountaineering problem. |
|
|
Buff John , I've started reading a pretty good book by J.E. Gordon, "Structures Or Why Things Don't Fall Down." I'm mostly interested in learning more about bridges, as I've always been amazed at the level of engineering that's required , and the superior engineering, and rigging skills involved in the construction of the Hoover Dam Bypass bridge especially; I've enjoyed on numerous occasions, watching it's construction, and progress (as much as I can see from the ground, anyway), and it's incredible! |





