Is climbing worth breaking up for ?

Uh Oh! Get ready for the march of the peacocks.

Hey, I'm not a peacock! I'm a handler.

Ken Cangi wrote:Uh Oh! Get ready for the march of the peacocks.

Didn't that already take place in the "A Victory for the Consumer" thread...?

Wooo Hooo!!! MoRE!!! MORE!! MmmmmOoooRRREEEE!

hhhehehehehe

John Langston wrote:I admire your honesty.

It's a shameless political strategy.

Shawn Mitchell wrote: No fair. Put it back on. You're making some of us feel bad--and the rest of us hot.

Shawn - you've started the shirt thread all over again!!

Well, maybe not you - but I'm blamin' you anyway!

Edit - shirt status - back on!

Richard Radcliffe wrote: Didn't that already take place in the "A Victory for the Consumer" thread...?

Same peacock, too.

caughtinside wrote: Really? Did those three old guys puffing their chests in a most embarassing way post photos to go along with the name dropping, name calling and climbing resumes?

I think you mean two guys, or really one. There was no puffing going on at this keyboard, although maybe a bit of inciting. Just out of idol curiosity, do you ever actually read what I post, or do you automatically default to the tired old Ken Cangi is an egotistical asshole diatribe?

I do remember you. You are the dipshit over at RC.Com who complained the the administrators that I was stalking you and that you believed that I was coming to your house to beat you up.

You are a strange little bird, with quite an imagination.

Jed Pointer wrote: I have a theory that you can tell how someone will be in the sack by watching how they introduce themselves to and play with your pet.

Your pet what, though?

caughtinside wrote: It's true Ken. When you started sending me unsolicited private messages asking me if I lived on Street X in my town, I thought that was really creepy.

Actually, I asked you were you lived because I was trying to find out if it was anywhere near where I lived when I attended UC,Davis.

You really aren't very bright, for as arrogant as you are. Some education in context and perspective might help to alleviate some of that paranoia. And don't fixate on me so much. It's not good for your mental health.

caughtinside wrote: If only all of us could be as ego free and intelligent as you Ken.

So what do you have to say about the address comment, or are you just going to completely avoid it? You should feel pretty foolish, but then that would require the maturity to acknowledge your mistake - something that you clearly lack.

Oh, stop. Get back to the hot guys climbing with no shirts on.

(shameless attempt at flattering the hottie)
Wasn't that Alex Huber upthread???.....(/shameless attempt at flattering the hottie)

Bob D'Antonio wrote: Your self-righteous attitude is noted and so is your self importance in thinking that Ken was stalking you. What a joke.

It's a painful display.

Happiegrrrl wrote:Oh, stop. Get back to the hot guys climbing with no shirts on. (shameless attempt at flattering the hottie) Wasn't that Alex Huber upthread???.....(/shameless attempt at flattering the hottie)

Go take a cold shower.

Why is it that every thread has to get back to this? It's one thing when you're arguing about something relevent to a post, but seriously, could somebody take the high road please?

Ken Cangi wrote: Go take a cold shower.

...but cold showers can be....didn't you see the scene in
"9 1/2" weeks with the ice cube???

Happiegrrrl wrote: ...but cold showers can be....didn't you see the scene in "9 1/2" weeks with the ice cube???

I'm hiding your batteries.

ew. I'm not that kind of girl.

Okay, go back to busting caughtinside's chops then, if you're going to conjure that sort of imagery.

Happiegrrrl wrote:ew. I'm not that kind of girl. Okay, go back to busting caughtinside's chops then, if you're going to conjure that sort of imagery.

Your new name is Sybil.

I never climb with my shirt off. It's embarrassing and people might think that I'm showing off my 147 pound body.