Mountain Project Logo
To save paper & ink, use the [Hide] controls next to photos and comments so you only print what you need.

Ants' Line

5.9, Trad, 80 ft (24 m),  Avg: 3.7 from 689 votes
FA: FA: Ants Leemets, 60's. FFA: Dave & Jim Erickson, 1968
New York > Gunks > Trapps > i. High E

Description

A great line with good protection within safe distance, all the way.

This climb is the major corner 25' left of the classic climb Bonnie's Roof, and just right of the Sleepwalk arete. A large tree grows near the base.

While there were lines on Bonnie's Roof on a crowded weekend when I was there, nobody was cued up for this climb.

P1: Stem and jam up the corner and finish up and left under the roof (crux) to reach a bolted belay station on the arete. 5.9, 80'.

Rap down or join Sleepwalk to reach the top of the cliff. Or you can continue up the fault straight above the route -- Cool Hand Duke (5.8).

From the anchor, one can TR Ent Line, on the steep wall left of Ants' Line, which I believe to be a play on names and words related to the large tree growing near the wall.

Protection

A standard light rack of nuts and cams to 3".

Photos [Hide ALL Photos]

Becky Diamond in the crux
[Hide Photo] Becky Diamond in the crux
Old photos shows that a crack at attachment point has been there for quite a while. To think about how many hands pulled on that (well chalked) jug ... Yes, thank you, big guy, for not taking us down with you.
[Hide Photo] Old photos shows that a crack at attachment point has been there for quite a while. To think about how many hands pulled on that (well chalked) jug ... Yes, thank you, big guy, for not taking us do…
Jon Otto leading up Ant's Line
[Hide Photo] Jon Otto leading up Ant's Line
Since the existing beta photo doesn't have a climber in it, I thought it might be nice to post one with a climber.
[Hide Photo] Since the existing beta photo doesn't have a climber in it, I thought it might be nice to post one with a climber.
The obvious corner of Ants' Line. The crux is undercling left and then up past the triangular overhang. The belay is on the arete at the skyline. Ent's Line, 11 something, climbs the cracks behind the tree on the left with several variations at the top.  Condemned Man 12a climbs the wall to the right of Ants' Line.
[Hide Photo] The obvious corner of Ants' Line. The crux is undercling left and then up past the triangular overhang. The belay is on the arete at the skyline. Ent's Line, 11 something, climbs the cracks behind…
Jon Otto leading up Ant's Line
[Hide Photo] Jon Otto leading up Ant's Line
Here's the block that came down in 2010.
[Hide Photo] Here's the block that came down in 2010.
Sweet line--get your rests in where you can.
[Hide Photo] Sweet line--get your rests in where you can.
Ant's Line
[Hide Photo] Ant's Line
Myself at the crux.
[Hide Photo] Myself at the crux.
Opening moves of Ants Line.
[Hide Photo] Opening moves of Ants Line.
Paige in action.
[Hide Photo] Paige in action.

Comments [Hide ALL Comments]

eric larson
aurora, co
  5.9
[Hide Comment] one of the most aesthetic lines in the gunks... just screams "Climb me!" a certain must do for the 5.9 gunks climber Apr 22, 2008
Michael Goodhue
Colorado
  5.9
[Hide Comment] This climb was fantastic! Walking up to it, I turned the corner and the first sight of it stopped me in my tracks. What a gorgeous line! Even better, there was no one in sight. Good gear and fun stemming the whole way. Oct 23, 2008
Aaron Moskowitz
Philadelphia
  5.9
[Hide Comment] On Sunday June 13th, 2010n a large block came off of Ant's Line. It now rests at the base of the climb. It came off in the rain as a party top-roped the wet route. This feature appeared solid but upon inspection (after it was on the ground) was nothing more than a poorly detached and heavy flake. The rock ripped a chunk out of the tree roots at the base of Ents Line. Fortunately and remarkably nobody was hurt. Jun 14, 2010
[Hide Comment] Thank goodness no one was hurt.

Do you have any more information about the former location of the block? Is it visible in any of the posted photos? Does its absence change the climb? Jun 14, 2010
Aaron Moskowitz
Philadelphia
  5.9
[Hide Comment] Seth, you can see the block directly below the climber in this photo: mountainproject.com/images/…

It was the small roof above the first large one... You can actually see the fracture line on the right side of the block. It's on the right side of the dihedral. The block itself is about a foot high, 2 feet wide and 6 inches deep. This was an important hand and foot through this section, so yes, the climbing down low is different. I don't know if it'll be much more difficult. I didn't get on the climb that day. Jun 14, 2010
[Hide Comment] Wow, big block. Thanks for the info. Jun 14, 2010
Goran Lynch
Alpine Meadows, CA
[Hide Comment] I was belaying my partner (TR on a soggy day) when the block came off. He was fully above it at the time (very, very fortunate) and not touching it at all. I was belaying leaning against the more distant of two large boulders at the base and saw the block coming with enough time to jump out of the way. Good thing, too, since the block came to rest just about where I was standing.

I climbed the route shortly after the rockfall to scope out the rock scar and the (new) climbing. The entire block was attached by, at most, a few square inches of stone, and has probably been loose for a long time. Many people have yarded on it and placed gear behind it on lead; given the typically heavy traffic, it's fantastically lucky that nobody was hurt when the block decided to separate. The absence of the block revealed some good hand holds, but does make for awkward footing as you step over the newly formed overlap. The block's absence doesn't change the grade or character of the route at all.

A first-hand lesson in why you ought not tie your belayer down (or make sure they're way, WAY out of the fall-line) in a single-pitch climbing scenario. Jun 14, 2010
[Hide Comment] ... added two new photos that show the location of the block, and its new resting place:

mountainproject.com/v/new_y…
mountainproject.com/v/new_y… Jun 14, 2010
K Baumgartner
  5.9
[Hide Comment] Bring your A game and grab rests where you can get them. I sewed it up with mostly passive pro with a #2 Camelot for good measure at the roof crux. I was seriously pumped at the crux and was loosing grip on the undercling, so I went for the move and stuck it. Beware of a loose brick sized block right above the roof. It looks like it's not going anywhere soon, but it's pretty rattly. Aug 27, 2012
Tim Stich
Colorado Springs, Colorado
 
[Hide Comment] Nothing too devious on this one for the solid 5.9 leader. If you can keep from getting pumped, you can figure it out. Sep 18, 2012
BROsenthal
Denver, CO
 
[Hide Comment] Fantastic pumpy route that has protection everywhere. *gear beta alert*
In addition to the #1 and #2 that you could get in on the inside of the overhang, the crux can be protected by a blue metolius mastercam at the leftmost point below the overhang. Slot it in from left to right and its bomber. Jun 23, 2014
Gail Blauer
Gardiner, NY
[Hide Comment] Great climb, lots of stances to place gear. Protects very well all the way up. I used a #3 at the crux, it's bomber. Jul 6, 2014
City Dweller
New York, NY
  5.9
[Hide Comment] So good! Oct 9, 2015
Isara Tungmanelatkul
Nashville
  5.9
[Hide Comment] Fantastic line! Soft for grade at the Gunks; spot on anywhere else. Reminded me of an easy version of In Pursuit of Excellence at the T-Wall. You can sew this thing up the entire way. I think I put in 11 pieces of gear because for whatever reason it was called "PG" by the people around me and I wanted to place before I didn't have the chance. There are rests the ENTIRE WAY except the 7-ish move crux. Not pumpy if you find the rests. Classic! Do it! May 27, 2016
David K
The Road, Sometimes Chattan…
  5.9+
[Hide Comment] I spent a few good months flailing on this, starting before I was really ready, to today when I finally sent! I've whipped on this in a bunch of different spots. On my send I protected it with all cams, but there's enough gear options in the lower section that you could protect most of it with just nuts. The gear gets a little more sparse as you near the top, but the falls are clean.

This route is the definition of G. There's no reason not to lead it if you know how to place gear! Nov 14, 2020
Andrew Kelleher
Durango, CO
  5.8+
[Hide Comment] Oooo man, that was fun. A glorious line of 5.8 with a quick 5.9 crux. VERY well protected. Great route for pushing into a new grade. May 3, 2021
The Weavers
High Falls NY
[Hide Comment] Classic dihedral climbing. Excellent gear and perfect stone make this a must do! Aug 23, 2021