Mountain Project Logo

Best anchoring practices for traverses

Marc801 C · · Sandy, Utah · Joined Feb 2014 · Points: 65

Colin,

Please take your religious nonsense elsewhere and stop forcing it on us.

Jim Titt · · Germany · Joined Nov 2009 · Points: 490
Marc801 C wrote:

Colin,

Please take your religious nonsense elsewhere and stop forcing it on us.

Indeed, MP is a diverse set of people and many of us would prefer it NOT to be used in anyway to proselytise or exclude anyone else due to their beliefs. RC.com tried the "Christian" gambit and died immediately. Keep ones religous views private between oneself and ones god, don't involve us.

Ryan Pfleger · · Boise, ID · Joined Sep 2014 · Points: 25
Fail Falling wrote:

Mods censoring my post, which was a direct quote from the Bible, and removing my post stating the difference between old testament and new testament quotes, but leaving the Bible verses listing and direct biblical quotes in OP's and other's posts. Hypocrisy much?

John 3:20

I mean considering the Bible contains (and condones) more contemptible cruelty than any other book I've read, I don't think you should be surprised it was censored. 

Fail Falling · · @failfalling - Oakland, Ca · Joined Jan 2007 · Points: 916
Ryan Pfleger wrote:

I mean considering the Bible contains (and condones) more contemptible cruelty than any other book I've read, I don't think you should be surprised it was censored. 

I've no problem with the bible being censored (my text Judges 22:19-29 was specifically pointing to the containing and condoning of contemptible cruelty) 

My problem is that if you're going to censor some of it, censor all of it. 

"Oh we're only censoring the offensive stuff, not the good stuff!" 

Sorry, the "good stuff" is the basis for the evangelizing  and hate that is a hallmark of the worst of the book's followers.

Andy Forquer · · Emeryville, CA · Joined May 2018 · Points: 5

I don't understand why Christians use Bible citations in a secular context like an internet climbing forum.

Between believers I can see how it might hold significance in an appeal to a higher/shared truth, or as a way of trying to engage in a somewhat scholarly debate on a shared issue ... so that one side or another can study and reference a text.

But for secular climbers that take issue with the proselytizing, it's not as if these citations hold any particular authority.  Furthermore, it strikes me as passive aggressive in thinly veiling your perspective.  

Fail Falling wrote:

Mods censoring my post, which was a direct quote from the Bible, and removing my post stating the difference between old testament and new testament quotes, but leaving the Bible verses listing and direct biblical quotes in OP's and other's posts. Hypocrisy much?

John 3:20

For example, if you look up that quote, it says "Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed."   You can't be seriously implying that volunteer moderators who make good faith efforts to keep things on-track are evil, right?

Marc801 C · · Sandy, Utah · Joined Feb 2014 · Points: 65
Andy Forquer wrote:

For example, if you look up that quote,…

I don’t even know how to do that. Actually, having never read the bible, I’ve never known what those names and numbers meant. If you haven’t guessed, I grew up in an overtly non-religious household and rejected religion at a very early age.

This is why I find Colin’s posts so objectionable.

Maybe Consider · · Forgiving Yourself · Joined Aug 2021 · Points: 0
Jim Titt wrote:

Indeed, MP is a diverse set of people and many of us would prefer it NOT to be used in anyway to proselytise or exclude anyone else due to their beliefs. RC.com tried the "Christian" gambit and died immediately. Keep ones religous views private between oneself and ones god, don't involve us.

please elaborate who or what is RC.com

Andy Forquer · · Emeryville, CA · Joined May 2018 · Points: 5
Marc801 C wrote:

I don’t even know how to do that. Actually, having never read the bible, I’ve never known what those names and numbers meant. If you haven’t guessed, I grew up in an overtly non-religious household and rejected religion at a very early age.

This is why I find Colin’s posts so objectionable.

I think that's why it all feels so unnecessary, but for your information...

  1. You can generally copy/paste any one of those 'Verses' into Google and get the referenced text
  2. The structure is [BOOK] [CHAPTER] : [VERSE] e.g. John 3:16
Ryan Pfleger · · Boise, ID · Joined Sep 2014 · Points: 25
Maybe Consider wrote:

please elaborate who or what is RC.com

https://rockclimbing.com/

Before that there was rec.climbing

Marc801 C · · Sandy, Utah · Joined Feb 2014 · Points: 65
Andy Forquer wrote:

I think that's why it all feels so unnecessary, but for your information...

  1. You can generally copy/paste any one of those 'Verses' into Google and get the referenced text
  2. The structure is [BOOK] [CHAPTER] : [VERSE] e.g. John 3:16

Yes, of course. But I would need to care enough to do so. 

Todd Jenkins · · Alexandria, VA · Joined Nov 2020 · Points: 16

This guy redirected his belay with a microtraxion and y'all are all hung up on Jesus?

rocknice2 · · Montreal, QC · Joined Nov 2006 · Points: 3,847
Todd Jenkins wrote:

This guy redirected his belay with a microtraxion and y'all are all hung up on Jesus?

The micro redirect was dismissed as a bad idea rather quickly but maybe you didn't see that part and were just focused on the bible study.

To add to that, God killed way more people than a micro redirect ever could. He would make Hitler and Stalin look like boy scouts with peashooters. Even the Chicxulub impact event pales in comparison.

Max Tepfer · · Bend, OR · Joined Oct 2007 · Points: 3,379
Andy Forquer wrote:

But for secular climbers that take issue with the proselytizing, it's not as if these citations hold any particular authority.  

I can't speak for others, but my issue isn't that I think the citations hold any authority, but rather the intent behind them.  This is a website about climbing and a forum about trad climbing.  I don't really have a problem with people talking about god or even proselytizing, but I do have a problem with it happening here.  Especially in a thread that's ostensibly about rock climbing technique.  Had the post been in the general or politics forum and been titled 'lets talk about how Jesus is the one true path,' that would be fine.

Fail Falling · · @failfalling - Oakland, Ca · Joined Jan 2007 · Points: 916
Andy Forquer wrote:

For example, if you look up that quote, it says "Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed."   You can't be seriously implying that volunteer moderators who make good faith efforts to keep things on-track are evil, right?

Extreme comparisons are the bedrock of humor and sarcasm. 

Todd Jenkins · · Alexandria, VA · Joined Nov 2020 · Points: 16
rocknice2 wrote:

The micro redirect was dismissed as a bad idea rather quickly but maybe you didn't see that part and were just focused on the bible study.

To add to that, God killed way more people than a micro redirect ever could. He would make Hitler and Stalin look like boy scouts with peashooters. Even the Chicxulub impact event pales in comparison.

That's exactly my point.  No "bad idea" on MP ever goes away with a quick dismissal unless there's something else to meaninglessly banter about.  ....and even you quickly got back to the "God" debate.  

Marc801 C · · Sandy, Utah · Joined Feb 2014 · Points: 65
Todd Jenkins wrote:

That's exactly my point.  No "bad idea" on MP ever goes away with a quick dismissal unless there's something else to meaninglessly banter about.

Since the OP either forgot or doesn't know that any anchor needs to be secure enough and strong enough to hold any rock climbing generated force from any direction, the rest of his comments or suggestions to solve the supposed problem are irrelevant, hence an easy, quick dismissal.

slim · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2004 · Points: 1,093
Ryan Never climbs wrote:

if you cant build a serene anchor prayers are your best bet 

Sure. But untying and throwing the rope down to your partner so they can bail is probably their best option...   

Neil B · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Dec 2020 · Points: 1

This got me thinking, any  climbing advice in the 'Good Book'?

I think Psalm137:9 might be recommending taking small children highball bouldering.

Fail Falling · · @failfalling - Oakland, Ca · Joined Jan 2007 · Points: 916
Neil B wrote:

This got me thinking, any  climbing advice in the 'Good Book'?

I think Psalm137:9 might be recommending taking small children highball bouldering.

I did not see that coming. well found. 

Colin McCurdy · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Sep 2021 · Points: 0

Isn’t it common practice to use active progress captures while simul climbing...

so what’s the issue here...

Also if one feels entitled to express their disdain for The Truth why would there be any issue with someone Standing Up for The Truth

JESUS said to him “I AM The WAY, The TRUTH and The LIFE. No one comes to The FATHER except through ME.”

Everyone should Stand and Live for The TRUTH with no regard to backlash

Galatians 1:10, Matthew 10:32

Someone asked about Scripture that pertains to Anchors

I Like this one

the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on The Rock

I am Very Confident in my Anchor

Matthew 7:25

have a Great night and GOD Bless,

Colin McCurdy 

This topic is locked and closed to new replies.

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community! It's FREE

Already have an account? Login to close this notice.