Fall from 2nd Flatiron [video; somewhat disturbing]
|
|
play stupid games win stupid prizes. glad he is ok but seems like kind of a dumbass. |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry my inner child laughed, 5.13 onsite my ass |
|
|
This is The Dawn Wall of MP threads. Wow. What a ride. |
|
|
Ramzi K wrote:Only on threads that hit a certain critical mass of idiocy. The antivaxxer thread got a gotez recap just before it got deleted. To see gotez to your heart’s content, follow our ranch: @westernculturefarmstead |
|
|
Fritz, Thanks for the doses of perspective. The goatez summary was right on. Lordy but MP needs more of that. |
|
|
Kyle, thanks for the respectful PM. Hope you recover quickly. |
|
|
The tables have turned. Kyle has us all examining our inner road cyclists... |
|
|
Mark Pilate wrote: The tables have turned. Kyle has us all examining our inner road cyclists... Where do E-Bikers fit in? |
|
|
master gumby wrote: Meh, I’d give it the bronze. Free fall for five seconds -> 122m = 400ft. So either truly a low gravity day, bouncing on slabs for five seconds, or physics level 5.13. Everyone’s an author on the internet... |
|
|
Math matters people!! |
|
|
Kyle - sorry, I’m not gonna engage you via PM about simple physics, but it is simple: 1/2*a*t^2; a = 9.8 m/s/s. So yeah no to the 5s free fall thing, you gotta fly from a little higher before you get those bragging rights. |
|
|
Tradiban wrote: Drytoolers |
|
|
|
|
|
+1 that the Flatirons are 5.13 if you invert. |
|
|
Try Cam wrote: +1 that the Flatirons are 5.13 if you invert. Eh, it just takes practice. I'll bet these guys would cruise it: patagonia.com/web/eu/patago… |
|
|
Try Cam wrote: +1 that the Flatirons are 5.13 if you invert. Nah, the wideboyz downgraded it to 5.11+ and did it without the bolts. |
|
|
Are there any betting pools for when this thread will die? |
|
|
like old lawyers, these threads don’t die. They just lose their appeal. |
|
|
I appreciate Kyle's enthusiasm. He sought an adventure and found one. I bet he will be more prepared next time. |









