|
|
Sam Stephens
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
PORTLAND, OR
· Joined Jan 2010
· Points: 1,090
Since we all know the cinch is prone to failure at the worst time, I found an awesome way to back it up. What do you think? Super duper safe right?
|
|
|
Gregger Man
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Broomfield, CO
· Joined Aug 2004
· Points: 1,859
'Slack' '...um' 'SLACK!' '...' 'I SAID SLACK!! NOW!' '...' 'FALLING!' 'Ok. Just lower me.' 'hmm...give me a minute'
|
|
|
Pavel Burov
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Russia
· Joined May 2013
· Points: 50
Strongly suggest to add a munter mule. 'cause there's no such a thing as too much safety.
|
|
|
Marc801 C
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Sandy, Utah
· Joined Feb 2014
· Points: 65
You forgot that for 100% safety there needs to be several Purcell prusiks in the system somewhere.
|
|
|
Matt Carroll
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Van
· Joined Dec 2013
· Points: 272
Eric is going to be so psyched about this redundency
|
|
|
Marc801 C
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Sandy, Utah
· Joined Feb 2014
· Points: 65
Matt Carroll wrote:Eric is going to be so psyched about this redundency He'll be psyched but never actually use it since he doesn't actually climb.
|
|
|
Firestone
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
California
· Joined Nov 2015
· Points: 186
Marc801 wrote:You forgot that for 100% safety there needs to be several Purcell prusiks in the system somewhere. Alternatively you could just throw a few clove hitches on lockers and attach them all to your forward most gear loop for easy access.
|
|
|
Marc801 C
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Sandy, Utah
· Joined Feb 2014
· Points: 65
Firestone wrote: Alternatively you could just throw a few clove hitches on lockers and attach them all to your forward most gear loop for easy access. But the Purcell's would reduce the impact force by 0.1kN - obviously that's much safer.
|
|
|
Chad Miller
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Grand Junction, CO
· Joined Nov 2006
· Points: 150
Why not just use a really burly belayer with lots of neck meat?
|
|
|
Mark E Dixon
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Possunt, nec posse videntur
· Joined Nov 2007
· Points: 984
Shouldn't the belayer be wearing three separate harnesses, one for each device? Or maybe it would be more dynamic if he extended each device with a double tether? Or could you just use the EMacrame clove hitch/rap ring/three point system?
|
|
|
Nick Drake
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Kent, WA
· Joined Jan 2015
· Points: 651
Mark E Dixon wrote:Shouldn't the belayer be wearing three separate harnesses, one for each device? I prefer to climb with quad ropes and four belayers.
|
|
|
BigB
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Red Rock, NV
· Joined Feb 2015
· Points: 340
Lulz ... this whole thread is close to violating RULE #1 ;)
|
|
|
M Mobley
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Bar Harbor, ME
· Joined Mar 2006
· Points: 911
Folks, its all about safety. Do you even practice safety? I'm out being safe right now, when I get back from being safe I'll post more about safety. I'n the meantime I suggest reading every piece of literature front to back(google will translate the languages for you) that Petzl has ever written if you really want to be safe.
|
|
|
Marc801 C
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Sandy, Utah
· Joined Feb 2014
· Points: 65
T Roper wrote:I'n the meantime I suggest reading every piece of literature front to back(google will translate the languages for you) that Petzl has ever written if you really want to be safe. Dude! You forgot the most important bit of advice: take a class in advanced macrame!
|
|
|
Greg D
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
Here
· Joined Apr 2006
· Points: 908
I prefer the Umpa 1 for the most reliable backup. Compatible with all belay devices.
|
|
|
Steve Williams
·
Aug 22, 2016
·
The state of confusion
· Joined Jul 2005
· Points: 235
Usually the catastrophic failure using a Cinch is operator error. Pretty much the same thing with a grigri.
|
|
|
M Mobley
·
Aug 23, 2016
·
Bar Harbor, ME
· Joined Mar 2006
· Points: 911
Since its a regional norm around here, maybe we could get the government to step in and ban unsafe belaying. That should help.
|
|
|
Tim Stich
·
Aug 23, 2016
·
Colorado Springs, Colorado
· Joined Jan 2001
· Points: 1,516
Marc801 wrote:You forgot that for 100% safety there needs to be several Purcell prusiks in the system somewhere. What about the Rosco P. Coltrane prusik?
|
|
|
Marc801 C
·
Aug 23, 2016
·
Sandy, Utah
· Joined Feb 2014
· Points: 65
Steve Williams wrote:Usually the catastrophic failure using a Cinch is operator error. Pretty much the same thing with a grigri. Wait. Are you trying to interject a serious reply in this particular thread? What is wrong with you?
|
|
|
BigB
·
Aug 23, 2016
·
Red Rock, NV
· Joined Feb 2015
· Points: 340
Steve Williams wrote:Usually the catastrophic failure using a Cinch is operator error. Pretty much the same thing with a grigri.
|
|
|
Sam Stephens
·
Aug 23, 2016
·
PORTLAND, OR
· Joined Jan 2010
· Points: 1,090
Steve Williams wrote:Usually the catastrophic failure using a Cinch is operator error. Pretty much the same thing with a grigri. Was there not enough sarcasm dripping from this thread for you to pick up on?
|