Whats the deal with aliens?
|
|
Hello everyone. This is my first post ever, i've been climbing about two years.....im a noob....be nice... I bought a used rack from a guide over a year ago and with it came a bunch of aliens. I heard from several people, some experienced, some not, some old time guides that aliens are crap and they break. I also heard from other people that they are great and very versatile. I personally like them a lot but find myself not wanting to trust them because other people have told me they are known to break Anyone have any other stories or better knowledge about them? Any advice? thanks for the info |
|
|
aliens are the shit(period). i have whipped on them multitudinous times over my 12 years of climbing with fantastic results. if placed well, they hold, end of story. |
|
|
stredna wrote:if placed well, they hold, end of story. That's definitely not the end of the story. Some Aliens were made poorly and don't even hold body weight. |
|
|
Make sure that they are stamped "tensile tested." If they are not, send them to CCH to be tested(I believe its free). |
|
|
pacoarg9, it's going to be a long road to find and read all of the various threads out there on Aliens. Start on rockclimbing.com and search. I have some bootied Aliens myself, so I of course use these two units. I tried to find the range of dates that they had production quality problems. |
|
|
Stich wrote:Sending the units to CCH for pull testing proves nothing, so don't bother with that. Why is that? Obviously, they can't really find out if the unit is full strength, but they should be able to tell if it's one of the units that doesn't even hold body weight... |
|
|
Look, aliens are great, not because of any testing qc issue; but because climbing with them is like sex with stone, sure there are risks; but then again, I have my needs |
|
|
never met anyone who actually broke an alien because of a factory problem. maybe im bias. to me, cch aliens are the best small camming units available (period). |
|
|
stredna wrote:aliens are the shit(period). nuf said! |
|
|
stredna wrote:[I've] never met anyone who actually broke an alien because of a factory problem. Well, I've never met anybody that's actually crashed a Fiat... :) Rob Kepley wrote: nuf said! It's not enough said. Some Aliens fall apart under body weight. A new climber is asking about the integrity of Aliens, and you guys are telling him to use them without consideration. I think that's irresponsible. |
|
|
Just remember, using aliens is a sin. |
|
|
They're great...until you take a fall and the head pops off and nearly kills you. Don't ask how I know this. |
|
|
Buff Johnson wrote:Just remember, using aliens is a sin. Everytime you plug yours into a crack, a kitten takes a dirt nap with Baby Jesus Still recovering from that comment. |
|
|
Listen to Mark. |
|
|
I like them, but I won't buy more due to their quality control issues. |
|
|
pacoarg9, |
|
|
2001??? I am very interested to know about |
|
|
Aliens are a very specialized piece of gear that will work in a placement where nothing else will. Use them for that purpose and they will serve you well. For most climbing it's hard to beat TCU's and C4's. |
|
|
Aliens are awesome and far superior to other micro-'quad' camming devices on the market. |
|
|
Marc H wrote: Why is that? Obviously, they can't really find out if the unit is full strength, but they should be able to tell if it's one of the units that doesn't even hold body weight... --Marc Because their tracking control is so bad that there was a documented case (search RC.com) of a unit being stamped tensile tested that failed under body weight. Obviously the unit was never tested but somehow got stamped. If you want them tested send them to an independent tester. |
|
|
People have decked and gotten messed up from these units failing. |




