Route Guide    Partners    Forum    Photos    What's New    Journal        
Sign Up  |   Log In:Login with Facebook
REI Community
Basilisk Wall
Routes Sorted
L to R R to L Alpha
Billy Get Your Guns T,TR 
Chopper Noise T,TR 
Chossy? TR 
Crankzilla T,TR 
Dragon's Belly T,TR 
Earth Dragon T,TR 
Fafnir TR 
Flake n' Take TR 
Fuzz, The T,TR 
Gentlemen Return Fire TR 
Hashtag, Swag, Yolo TR 
Paper Mache TR 
PROJECT T,TR 
Shit Load of Chips T,TR 
Testicular Trauma TR 
There is No Spoon TR 
Too Many Video Games TR 
Treehugger TR 

Hashtag, Swag, Yolo 

YDS: 5.11b/c French: 6c+ Ewbanks: 23 UIAA: VIII- ZA: 24 British: E4 6a

   
Type:  TR, 1 pitch, 40'
Original:  YDS: 5.11b/c French: 6c+ Ewbanks: 23 UIAA: VIII- ZA: 24 British: E4 6a [details]
FA: FA TR, Justin Richardson, Sept. 2013
Page Views: 870
Submitted By: Norm3 on Aug 10, 2014

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (1)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
Your opinion of this PAGE:    [0 people like this page.]
BETA PHOTO: #SwagYolo

Description 

Super classic route - fun moves, great pump, good (sometimes marginal) holds, and worth all the effort!

Climb up the center of the obvious black streak on the left side of the Basilisk wall on razor holds. Some holds include a half moon and a chicken head. Avoid the moss at the top to the left and top out.

Location 

At the obvious black streak on the left side of the Basilisk Wall.

Protection 

None. Long static for TR anchor off trees.


Photos of Hashtag, Swag, Yolo Slideshow Add Photo
Rock Climbing Photo: Projecting Hashtag Swag Yolo. The belayer is Justi...
Projecting Hashtag Swag Yolo. The belayer is Justi...

Comments on Hashtag, Swag, Yolo Add Comment
Show which comments
By Jon H
From: Boulder
Oct 21, 2014

For what it's worth, I'm relatively certain my buddies and I were climbing this line years ago, long before the closure. Maybe 2002 or so? FA is probably long before that - we definitely weren't the first.
By Norm3
From: North Jersey
Oct 21, 2014

Oh yeah, 100%. People have been climbing here long before any of us. Just no one kept records. If a new guidebook ever comes out there will be a section dedicated to all these previous unknown climbers, acknowledging we weren't the first. We weren't the first. We just want to start recording it for future climbers.
By Logan Schiff
From: Brooklyn, NY
Aug 1, 2016

Good to start documenting it but seems silly to list a FA name that is clearly incorrect. I would rather see Unknown for the first ascensionist.
By Norm3
From: North Jersey
Sep 11, 2016

Logan - the more accurate documentation is in the Rakkup guidebook. MP is somewhat reliable for the Powerlinez, but doesn't stay as updated. Also, all the bouldering is on the Rakkup guide.

I hear what you're saying about FAs and we took that into serious consideration. In Rakkup, all FAs are considered ACB (As Climbed By). Not every route has written ACB explicitly, but anyone who has done an "FA" knows that it is hard to consider it a true never-been-climbed-by-a-human-before ascent. This place is close to major population areas and people have been messing around - legally and illegally - for years. ACB is simply to indicate this is our most recent documented and accurate (peer supported) knowledge of someone's climb, their grade, protection and more. It is only to benefit the larger community.

This is not to disrespect anyone who has climbed here before. It is just our way to support local climbers who are out doing the work of developing the area.
By Bowzer
From: Albany, NY
Sep 19, 2016

right but you didn't write ACB. you wrote FA TR for someone you know didn't actually do the FA. kinda odd.
By Norm3
From: North Jersey
Oct 3, 2016

Yes. What I wrote and what we intended is that all powerlinez climbs should be considered ACB. We are highly doubting that anything climbed there is a "true" first ascent. We considered writing ACB on all climbs, but instead chose a disclaimer as an umbrella for all climbs.

I will be sure to add any details to the main description in rakkup so that there is no confusion.