Continue with onX Maps
Continue with Facebook
Crazy Mad Rock Gemini double-biner
|
youtube.com/watch?v=dJfXFQd…
Oh. I looked some more. It's called the Gemini and it's a belay carabiner. Seems like a terribly over-engineered solution to something as simple as belay device cross-loading, considering how simple the capture wires on other products are. |
|
In most situations, I just don't actually worry that much about a cross-loaded belay biner. In no top-rope or single-pitch lead situation will the force on my belay biner even come close to the 7-9 kN cross-load rating. The only point I might worry about this, is if I'm catching a high-factor fall off the anchor in a multi-pitch situation. I try to avoid those for other reasons than belay biner cross-load, though. |
|
Black Diamond Gridlock seems infinitely more elegant. |
|
Wish it had a nicer top bar cross-section. I'll get one of these because it's goofy and I love gadgets, but for belaying with a tube device the best picks are the WC Ascent Lite Belay, and the Grivel Clepsydra, which both have nice big, round top bars. |
|
Man... That is one complex and over-engineered fix to what is barely a problem.  I am not at all concerned about cross loading of belay biners. That said, all of my belay biners have some sort of anti cross load feature, not because I think it's a safety concern (I do not when it comes to belay biners) but because I am a control freak. I don't like my belay biners spinning around when a don't want them to, and I never want them to. |
|
Dafuq? |
|
It looks like it's promoting bad habits because the one side looks like it's not locked even though it is. |
|
The whole fascination with anti-cross-loading gimmickry for belay biners is so perplexing to me. |
mpech wrote:The whole fascination with anti-cross-loading gimmickry for belay biners is so perplexing to me. Has anyone, in the history of rock climbing, ever had a locking biner break by cross-loading in a belay situation? (I'm talking about normal belay scenarios, not rope-solo)biners breaking isn't the only issue with crossloading. It also make some belay devices harder to operate and is really annoying. |
mpech wrote:The whole fascination with anti-cross-loading gimmickry for belay biners is so perplexing to me. Has anyone, in the history of rock climbing, ever had a locking biner break by cross-loading in a belay situation? (I'm talking about normal belay scenarios, not rope-solo)I totally agree. A solution to a problem that doesn't exist. |
Mark Hudon wrote: I totally agree. A solution to a problem that doesn't exist.I can only speak for myself. The problem that it is a solution for is not an issue of safety; it is an issue of annoyance. |
|
I agree with the annoying part but I don't believe it was designed to solve an annoyance. |
|
Anti crossload biners may help with autotubers like the Megajul/Up. Thoughts? |
Firestone wrote:Anti crossload biners may help with autotubers like the Megajul/Up. Thoughts?Get a Mega Jul package. It comes with cross-loading preventing binner. |
Firestone wrote:Anti crossload biners may help with autotubers like the Megajul/Up. Thoughts?There´s a fair few like the Smart, ClickUp and so on that don´t work at all if the karabiner is crossed. Some don´t even work with things like the Belay Master. |
Jim Titt wrote: There´s a fair few like the Smart, ClickUp and so on that don´t work at all if the karabiner is crossed. Some don´t even work with things like the Belay Master.You wouldn't want to use a biner like that for a smart, though, as it doesn't have a round cross-section. That being said, I think the mad rock thing is over-engineered. A simple wiregate is much simpler solution. Keep it simple, stupid. |
