What do you tell people the grade you climb is?

Whatever the other person says add a grade, Climbing is highly competitive and your dominance needs to be established early. They climb 5.4 you climb 5.5 they climb 5.10c you climb 5.10d . If they see you struggle up a 5.7 when you said you climb 5.13 tell them your hung-over, sick, Just not “feeling” it today.

Guy Keesee wrote:5.15C is my standard answer. I don't wish to brag.

Example: I remember back when I was climbing 5.15c took me a bit to climb 5.15d where I am climbing now.

camhead wrote: It's simple. You take the easiest climb that you've fallen on in the last six months, and subtract a number from it. That's the grade that you climb. Next question, please?

Shit.

I tripped walking to class the other day and haven't climbed in six months. I'm less than a walker. I NEED a walker.

For what it's worth, I just tell people "not hard" and let them go from there.

For the record, I've never seen anyone crank a real offwidth.

Yeah.. not really crank so much as grovel upwards while praying.

I was having a conversation with a guy over the phone whom I hadn't climbed with before. I asked him about his qualifications (experience) for climbing a mixed ice route we were considering climbing togethere. His answer: "I mean, I climb 5.11 in the gym..."

5.fun

F&%king Hard!!!

I too have always wondered how to define myself by the grade I climb and to know when I am better than other people, or if they are better than me (in which case I normally resort to petty comments regarding their girlfriends or clothing to cut them down to size). do tell.

i think taking the hardest gym route you have done, subtracting the 5 prefix and adding a V is commonly acceptable yes?

Princess Mia wrote:Grades only count if you include how hard you crank on off-widths.......

Gimme a break no one cares how hard anyone climbs offwidths with the exception of maybe five users on MP.

Josh Kornish wrote:I take the hardest grade I've ever hang dogged and then add 1 number grade to it. I'm a legend in my own mind.

Yeeeeahhhh!!!! It's 1994 and the Colinator is still 13d!

Most recent onsight

5.9 climber

I love reading these. It really is priceless.

It seems to starts with wanting to climb harder when you begin climbing.
Then moves to wanting to climb HARD (definition varies based on where your from) or harder than so and so.
Finally it moves to this,

GMBurns wrote: Shit. I tripped walking to class the other day and haven't climbed in six months. I'm less than a walker. I NEED a walker. For what it's worth, I just tell people "not hard" and let them go from there.

Though some people never make it there.

I also think it is great how Trad climbers in general are the ones saying that it only matters how hard you climb in their preferred style, not to pick on Mia but it was the easiest to find,

Princess Mia wrote:Grades only count if you include how hard you crank on off-widths.......

You don't see a sport climber saying that only sport matters or someone who boulders saying only V-grades matter, food for thought.

Of course this could be relevant as part of the conversation if you were to be getting on, Rites of Passage or Free Rider, but really I can belay just fine on The Big Baby and then go climb Black Corner just fine. Really though, getting on a multi pitch route with a partner you've never climbed with is tempting fate.

OldManRiver wrote:before I climb with anyone it's imperative that they answer the following questions: - Do you know how to catch a lead fall? - Do you have any beer with you? Grade isn't very important folks.

Really the first part of this is really the most important, the second part may well be important to many as well.

Usually when this comes up as a question I'm expected to answer I'll already know what route we are thinking of doing so the answer is easy, either "hard enough", "could be issues" or "not hard enough".

I really find the opposition to honest discussion of grades to be quite perplexing. People treat grades as a taboo to talk about, and to discuss grades is often dismissed as elitist spray, or something of the like. This is absurd; grades are a useful and neccesary descriptor in climbing.

Case study: last winter I met up to climb with a friend that I had not seen in a few years. He had been a rank beginner as of the last time we had interacted, but I knew that he had gained a fair bit of experience since then...but I didn't know exactly how much he had progessed. Since I knew that area in which we were climbing better than he, it was up to me to choose a wall at which we would both have fun. In order to make an informed decision, I had to know what grade he was climbing now. If he had progressed a lot and was climbing 5.12, then perhaps we would go to El-Rad-O-Cave. But if he was still climbing 5.10, then it might be best to stick to El-Fun-O-Slab. As such, describing "the grade that you climb" is a useful and neccesary metric to help everyone find a route that they will enjoy.

The neccesary disclaimer, when trying to encapsulate youself as a climber in a single number, is that "your grade" is generlly different for different styles. As such, it is usually neccesary to say "I can usually redpoint 5.xx sport, onsight 5.yy sport, and tend to stick to 5.zz or below when climbing on long trad routes." Again, useful and honest reporting, in a simple, quantified manner, vastly facilitates the making of appropriate plans.

Lastly, it should be noted that qualitative measures are not adequate. Calling something "hard" or "moderate" is meaningless, since the range of abilties in climbing is distruted on such a log scale. One person's "steep, hard, sustained route" is another's "warmup jughaul", and it can be hard to tell exactly what someone is talking about unless you attatch a number to it. Trying to describe climbing and make plans without grades is like trying to give a recipie and bake a cake without any measuring cups. A system of measurement is a useful thing.

The way the question was asked, was more of a "mine is bigger than yours" type of question. If randomly asked, out and about (NEVER happens) that is one thing. If discussing true capabilities with a potential new partner, that is entirely different. In the case of the former, a nice f-off might suffice. In the case of the latter, just be honest at worst, or play yourself down a bit at best. This discussion is almost like "how long are your skis?" as a system of sizing up. Pointless.

This thread is classic. It just begs for all the brilliant smart-ass answers so far. Hehe.
I haven't been asked that in a long time. Ive had to fill out information sheets for guiding jobs and I struggle with estimations of difficulty. Everything's subjective isn't it? Somedays I pull 11s at the New or Red Rocks.... Somedays I fall on weird 5.8 at Seneca. Who knows?

Oh, and by the way... Isn't the "grade" how long it takes to do the climb (grade I - VI) and the class is the difficulty (class 1 through 6) and then the class has subsections (5.0 to 5.15).
That's how Ive always understood the Yosemite Decimal System

This whole thread is a good example of how people climb in different styles, for different reasons. When we don't recognize that, we all talk past each other.

The question "What grade do you climb?" can mean several different things, depending on the context.

- For a multipitch trad climb, it might make sense to give your reliable onsight grade, to help your partner(s) plan out what routes are reasonable.

- For a sport climbing trip, it makes more sense to talk about what grades you want to attempt onsights and what grades you want to project, to help plan an itinerary. Your past achievements don't matter as much as your current plans. When querying partners, you'll get a much better response from "What kinds of grades are you looking to get on?" versus "What grade do you climb?" - The former is unburdened by expectation.

- If you're trying to gauge personal progress (e.g. last year I climbed 5.10, this year I'm climbing 5.11), then use whatever you find most rewarding - reliable onsights, or max onsight, or max redpoint, etc. Heck, use "reliable 3rd-go redpoint in >80 degrees" if that's what gets you excited.

- If you're trying to see how you stack up against another climber, then make sure you're talking about the same thing, and preferably agree on whatever form of "climbing grade" you are personally best at. Or better yet... don't. I've been asked what grade I climb perhaps once in the last 5 years. The vagueness and implied ego make it one of the worst (and least interesting) questions you can ask of a fellow climber.

Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today?
Ty Webb: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score.
Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers?
Ty Webb: By height.

Rajiv Ayyangar wrote:This whole thread is a good example of how people climb in different styles, for different reasons. When we don't recognize that, we all talk past each other. The question "What grade do you climb?" can mean several different things, depending on the context. - For a multipitch trad climb, it might make sense to give your reliable onsight grade, to help your partner(s) plan out what routes are reasonable. - For a sport climbing trip, it makes more sense to talk about what grades you want to attempt onsights and what grades you want to project, to help plan an itinerary. Your past achievements don't matter as much as your current plans. When querying partners, you'll get a much better response from "What kinds of grades are you looking to get on?" versus "What grade do you climb?" - The former is unburdened by expectation. - If you're trying to gauge personal progress (e.g. last year I climbed 5.10, this year I'm climbing 5.11), then use whatever you find most rewarding - reliable onsights, or max onsight, or max redpoint, etc. Heck, use "reliable 3rd-go redpoint in >80 degrees" if that's what gets you excited. - If you're trying to see how you stack up against another climber, then make sure you're talking about the same thing, and preferably agree on whatever form of "climbing grade" you are personally best at. Or better yet... don't. I've been asked what grade I climb perhaps once in the last 5 years. The vagueness and implied ego make it one of the worst (and least interesting) questions you can ask of a fellow climber.

This sums up generally how I feel on the subject much better than I could even begin to write it.

Expecting someone to boil down their entire climbing abilities into a single grade is at best a useless piece of information. A short discussion on what someone's goals are is far more informative and far less like a dick measuring contest. (In my opinion)