Continue with onX Maps
Continue with Facebook
JOE RANDOM > Comments
|
Aug 19, 2019
●
I don't know the name of the extension, but it's .13b/c and has a thin crux shortly after the anchors. My m…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 28, 2019
●
I agree with others that felt the 5.9 was darn hard, but well protected. I didn't find any unprotected trav…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 28, 2019
●
An OK route, but the rock quality on the upper pitches really takes away from the rest. There seemed to be…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 28, 2019
●
Destined to become popular: good hardware, comfy belays, safe (by local standards), and decent climbing. Al…
View Comment
|
|
Dec 10, 2018
●
Kind of a disappointing route. Wanders a lot despite the proximity to the arete and has poor rock in severa…
View Comment
|
|
Dec 10, 2018
●
This wall is a good choice for cold days.
View Comment
|
|
Dec 10, 2018
●
I second the need to for several grey C3s. I would have been scared with less than 3.
View Comment
|
|
Nov 12, 2018
●
Just like Max says, it's a great route. Regarding the runout pitch, we found the truly runout climbing sign…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 24, 2018
●
I found a lot of gear on this one, but probably had 6 or 7 red sliders with a few blue sliders. I felt safe…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 24, 2018
●
This one all comes down to seeing the sequence through the roof. I doubt one would fall off above after pul…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 19, 2018
●
Very sustained climbing climbing with some brilliant moves up high. I thought this one was miles harder tha…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 19, 2018
●
All three of the .12c routes on this slabby wall were phenomenal (imho), but I thought this was the best. N…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 19, 2018
●
As a visiting climber, I wasn't hugely impressed by the quality of this one. It should probably remain a li…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 10, 2018
●
Great line. The ledge in the middle makes it feel like two different routes, especially considering how dif…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 4, 2018
●
I'll echo some of the comments below: I thought the slab extension was far harder than anything on Ghostrid…
View Comment
|
|
Aug 3, 2018
●
This starts with some moderate climbing leading into a series of very crimpy moves before easing off sign…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 14, 2018
●
I was pretty confused by the grade of this thing. .12a seemed quite generous; .10+ would be fair at most cr…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 14, 2018
●
I've been on this line twice over several years and have had the same experience as Robbie. Most recently,…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 10, 2018
●
There is a challenging variation to this line that adds about a number to the grade. At the pod towards the…
View Comment
|
|
Jul 4, 2018
●
I agree with Casey that this is a worthy line with ok protection at the start. I took Jeff's rack beta but…
View Comment
|
|
Jun 28, 2018
●
I kinda expected the climbing to be more difficult on this than it is, but the protection at the crux seems…
View Comment
|
|
Jun 23, 2018
●
This one has been repeated at least once, probably more. Well worth doing; just like you say. I thought the…
View Comment
|
|
May 19, 2018
●
I found this route horribly dirty, which significantly diminished the quality (imho). Maybe this is just a…
View Comment
|
|
May 15, 2018
●
I can't imagine the sharp, downward pointing flake just left of the crux will be with us too long. Careful…
View Comment
|
|
May 15, 2018
●
Wow, this is a great addition to the white wall. The description is a little vague regarding the start and…
View Comment
|
|
May 15, 2018
●
I found the top to be more than exciting, but pretty scary with hard to find gear. After onsighting through…
View Comment
|
|
May 13, 2018
●
This route protects, but it takes some work. I placed more wires on this one than any other route I've done…
View Comment
|
|
May 13, 2018
●
I agree this route is a journey. Though there is generally good gear, I can't recommend a ground up approac…
View Comment
|
