Mountain Project Logo
To save paper & ink, use the [Hide] controls next to photos and comments so you only print what you need.

This, My Friend

5.10a, Trad, 900 ft (273 m), 5 pitches, Grade III,  Avg: 3.4 from 59 votes
FA: Andy Wyatt, Chris Potts, August 2020
Washington > Central-E Casca… > Stuart-Enchantm… > Dragontail Peak

Description

Overview

900+ feet of quality, sustained crack (and some face) climbing on very good rock, up the elegant East Face of the NE Towers of Dragontail Peak. This climb offers a real alpine climbing experience with long pitches and no fixed protection or anchors, engaging and playful movement, at a surprising and unusually-accessible grade. It takes a natural line up a relatively less explored aspect of one of the most prominent peaks in the range, with a nice position and a friendly scramble descent. The route has comfortable belay ledges approximately every 55 meters, and is in the sun from early morning until early afternoon.

Established over the 2nd week of August, 2020 by Andy and Katherine Wyatt, Chris Potts, and Margot Fahey. The first climb of the route (by Andy and Chris) was an onsight, ground-up, and C2C ascent. Later in the week, Andy, Katherine, Chris, and Margo returned for multiple days and rigorously cleaned the route. Regardless, the route remains a true alpine endeavor that requires careful travel and consideration. 

Note: The E and NE aspects of Dragontail (including the NE Towers) terminate into the E summit of Dragontail. This is atop Dragons of Eden, and the other routes on the east half of the mountain. The East summit is separated from the main summit by a long serrated ridge. Conceivably, one could traverse the ridge connecting the East summit and the main summit (this may or may not have been done before). While not the termination of this route, the highest summit can be reached by descending off the E summit (see descent notes) and ascending the southern slopes via 3rd and 4th class scrambling.

Route

P1, 5.9+, 58M. Ascend fifty feet of easy climbing, climb ten feet of face around the right side of a recessed pod, and then back into the main crack. Punch up the main crack, with some smaller over lapping cracks, offering very fun and engaging movement. Atop the main crack, continue through broken and moderate terrain to the obvious ledge and climb 20 feet beyond the right of the two tree/bushes. Belay on .1-.3 cams and small nuts at the base of the beautiful corner above. Note, this pitch protects well using slightly more thoughtful placements relative to the other pitches on the route; all 5.9 moves could be pulled through on gear.

P2, 5.9, 55M. Stem your way up the initial 10-foot OW pod before launching up a gorgeous and sustained corner crack, offering spectacular and pure crack climbing from locker fingers to perfect hands. This is a powerful pitch that rewards strong arms and good jamming technique. Look for foot features along the way to ease the grade and add more creative movement. When the corner ends, continue up and left approx 20’ and stop at a crack on the right that accepts bomber med-large nuts and cams. 

P3, 5.6, 45M. Ascend the broken crack system directly above the belay, gaining a sloping ledge beneath a pair of obvious zig-zag cracks. Climb through these zig-zag cracks to a wide and large sandy ledge. Belay in the clean crack in the middle of this ledge. 

P4, 5.7, 58M. This clean headwall with a splitter crack that catches your eye from the ground is even more spectacular than it looks. Even more defining is the friendly grade and secure climbing, especially for such a dramatic and full pitch. Begin approx 15-20 feet right of the belay and climb easily up the right side of the protruding ear. Move left a few moves along a thin crack rail to gain the main crack, offering phenomenal and varied crack climbing with excellent movement. Take this long pitch up and slightly right to a large, flat ledge. Belay on the right side of the ledge, to the right of the vertical leaning block.  

P5, 5.7, 55M. Climb up and left through broken ledges for approx 20 feet gaining a crack that climbs, pleasantly, up the right side of a right facing dark ear feature. Zig zag up and generally left through varied crack systems, face features, knobs, and small ledges. Exit off the left side of the face, turning the corner into a belay alcove approx 20’ below and to the left of the summit pinnacle. 

Descent

After summiting, work S and W across broken 3rd and 4th class terrain, slowly losing elevation until you gain a clean gully (approximately 500’ from the final belay station). Descend this to a large and obvious ledge, then scramble SW to walkable terrain, intersecting the standard summit descent to Aasgard Pass. Note, this was the easiest descent found by the FA party, however, many alternatives exist. Walk on cairned, braided and rocky trails to the top of Aasgard Pass.

The route is not set up for rappel.

Location

Hike to the south side of Colchuck Lake, then up approx 85% of the trail up Aasgard Pass. At approx 7250’ the main trail crosses right across Aasgard’s largest river braid; continue approx 5-10 min past this point, leaving the trail between approx 7300-7400 feet, crossing loose scree up and right, heading directly to the base of the route. The route begins approx 300 feet below where the top of Aasgard pass meets the toe of Dragontail, and below where two small tree/bushes sit on the first belay ledge, up approx 190 feet; start below the right side of the right bush. It could also be identified as starting in the middle of the protruding tower.

Protection

Doubles from .2-#2, singles of .1 and #3, a healthy set of stoppers (route takes good nuts), and an assortment of runners. If leading at your grade, or not comfortable putting distance between your gear, add your choice of triples from .3 to #2, a second #3, and a #4. Note that the pitches on this route are all nearly 60M, with no fixed protection, and use gear belays. If you prefer feeling well-protected, it will require a fairly-significant amount of gear (which the cracks will gladly accept).

Photos [Hide ALL Photos]

Route overlay
[Hide Photo] Route overlay
Route as seen from approx half way up Aasgard Pass.
[Hide Photo] Route as seen from approx half way up Aasgard Pass.
Jedi on the summit pinnacle
[Hide Photo] Jedi on the summit pinnacle
Route as seen from the Aasgard Pass trail, just before veering off and crossing talus directly to the base of the route.
[Hide Photo] Route as seen from the Aasgard Pass trail, just before veering off and crossing talus directly to the base of the route.
Wyatt leading P4 on the FA
[Hide Photo] Wyatt leading P4 on the FA
Pitch 4
[Hide Photo] Pitch 4
The start of pitch 2. Stem, jam, smear, lay it back. So fun!
[Hide Photo] The start of pitch 2. Stem, jam, smear, lay it back. So fun!
Katie leading P4
[Hide Photo] Katie leading P4
Heading up the headwall pitch. Smiles were even bigger 55m later.
[Hide Photo] Heading up the headwall pitch. Smiles were even bigger 55m later.
Will headed up Pitch 1.
[Hide Photo] Will headed up Pitch 1.
Myself starting P1 with the flaring crack above
[Hide Photo] Myself starting P1 with the flaring crack above
Belaying from the "alcove" at the top of the route on pitch 5
[Hide Photo] Belaying from the "alcove" at the top of the route on pitch 5

Comments [Hide ALL Comments]

will hanson
Seattle, WA
  5.9+
[Hide Comment] Great moderate addition to the area. Pitch 2 is worth the hike alone. We brought doubles and ended pitch 2 & 4 with empty harnesses. Eats up gear!
Descent was straightforward, glad we did it in the light as there are so many options.
Very hexcited to go back and pair this with something on Prusik. Sep 7, 2020
Lindsey Gay
Seattle, WA
  5.10-
[Hide Comment] What a fun route that truly has a little bit of everything.

Rack:
Double rack .3 - #2 w/ single #3, triples .4, .5, .75
60m rope

  • I wish I had triple #1 & #2 and felt like I didn't need triples of .4 or .5. The top 20' of pitch 2 only takes #1, #2

Pitch 1. From the ground the obvious crack about 3/4 way up (the crux) looks like a hand crack but it's not quite deep enough to jam. Gear is around but not everywhere, so take it when you get it. I found this section to be very insecure and physical. You could aid through this short section if necessary. (5.10)

Pitch 2. Holey moley this thing is quality. Moving off the belay starts out a little awkward / wide / physical - but it's easily protected. From there on it's just pure corner climbing joy and easy to protect anywhere you want the entire pitch. Eats up #1 and #2 - and it's a very long pitch so be sure to save some for the upper section. Towards the top you pass through 2 mini roofs, which I found to be secure but quite physical. (5.10-)

Pitch 3. A little wandery but generally head straight up. We had this pitch at 35M to the ledge which looked more gravely to me then sandy. Belayed from the crack in the middle of the wall, on bomber gear, and then bumped us both over to the base of pitch 4 (one small piece) before starting pitch 4. (5.6)

Pitch 4. WOW. Seriously? So good. A full 58 meters of hand jams that never stop. About 3/4 of the way up the crack splits - straight up the hand sized crack to a scary looking tooth or step right into thinner cracks - either goes. I tested the tooth a bit and it seems solidly in place, but opted not to pull / stand on it. Top anchor took #1, .5, .3 - but other options exist. This is a solid and consistent pitch of climbing. (5.8)

Pitch 5. Fun wandering through cracks and edges to the top. (5.7)

Moving at a casual pace:
Approach: 4 hours
Climb: 5 hours
Decent to base: 1 hour


HUGE thanks to the crew for establishing this line. Sep 10, 2020
Michael Preiss
Hobart, WA
[Hide Comment] Did you summit the main summit or top of the pinnacle? Sep 23, 2020
Michael Preiss
Hobart, WA
[Hide Comment] nevermind i just read u didn't Sep 23, 2020
Michael Carter
  5.10-
[Hide Comment] Such a great route, that will only get better after it sees a bit more traffic and more of the minor lichen and minor looseness clean-up.

Pitch 1, is definitely the crux and is harder than 5.9+. The crack is fun, but steep and a bit insecure. Good moves with good gear. 5.10-
Pitch 2 is the money pitch. 175 feet of corner crack climbing. sustained at 5.9, but if you stem and use your feet there are rests throughout most of the the pitch.
Pitch 3 is the worst of the bunch, and basically just links the bottom 2 pitches with the top 2. This pitch was dirty and likely will never clean-up, but do not be deterred. the other 4 pitches make this transition pitch easily forgotten. 5.6
Pitch 4 is the second money pitch, with great sustained 5.7 crack climbing on the headwall. Wherever the jams are not solid, the feet are big. Overall just a fun pitch. 5.7
Pitch 5 is a good finish to the climb. 5.7 face and crack to the top.

we took a double rack from purple metolius to BD #3, and had enough. P2 and P4 eat up gear, but there are enough options that we did not feel triples were required. a set of nuts was good for belays, and could be used as pro if needed.

the descent was not too bad, but hopefully someone will find the best way down and put some cairns out to guide the way. Many options, with some cliffing out... We generally went SW and down until we hit the dragontail trail. there was a couple sections that were a bit more exposed/tricky, but overall not too bad. Oct 2, 2020
Messem M
Seattle, WA
[Hide Comment] Agree with those above. This is a great moderate addition to the area. Still fresh so watch for rockfall, but will clean up really nice with time. Big thanks to the FA team for finding a fantastic route AND posting excellent beta.

Approach: straight forward from the description, but just in case, coordinates are: N 47.481258 W 120.825989. Gets morning sun, but goes into shade mid-day. Dress accordingly.

Gear: agree doubles will do if you are OK spacing gear. We found triples of 0.3-0.4 handy. Tricams were not necessary but were carried for good luck.

P1: My partner & I weren't sure whether to call this 9+ or 10-. Either way, it's definitely the mental crux, so if you are pushing your grade, be aware that this pitch starts to feel pretty insecure since the crack gets too shallow to properly jam, and pro becomes more tricky, right as it steepens.

P2: SUPER pitch. Again 9+ or 10-. Very physical, but very secure. Would be a solid 10 were it not for the regular rests that are present if you look a bit.

P3: what? was there a pitch 3? Pretty forgettable but offers nice rest after P2.

P4: SUPER pitch. Recommend shuffling the belay to the bottom of the headwall crack. We belayed from the "middle ledge" crack at the top of P3 and scooted a cam up for about 30ft off the ledge to avoid rope drag which worked fine too. The "tooth" is loose so take care, or bring a dentist.

P5: After setting the belay just to the left of the head-high, vertical, leaning pillar (where P4 naturally ends), we realized we should have followed the FA beta and placed it to the RIGHT of this pillar to avoid potential for rockfall in the first part of this pitch. Exit is 20-30 ft left of the obvious central chimney/crack at a breakdown that turns into an alcove.

Descent: We headed a little too much South (down), and not enough West (right) and ended up backtracking a bit before finding the proper exit. This upper section could use some cairns when someone figures it out, but once you are walking out, cairns are nicely placed (thanks!). Oct 5, 2020
Jon Parker
Seattle, WA
[Hide Comment] Pitch 2 is A+, nice find!
There’s still lots of loose crap on ledges above P2 and P4, so be careful belaying your follower. Oct 10, 2020
Doug Hutchinson
Seattle and Eastrevy
 
[Hide Comment] Great route Andy and Chris! And to answer the question I wondered about, you do NOT need ax/'pons for the descent. You stay on rock until hitting the standard D-tail descent near its bottom where the snow is mellow/low angle. Jul 16, 2021
Jplotz
Cashmere, WA
[Hide Comment] Climbing CBR yesterday, we noticed a new and large rock scar as indicated in a photo I manipulated. Arrow indicates where the scar is and probably the source of the recent Asgard Pass rock slide, on the Northwest side of the pillar. People are climbing the route so obviously it's unscathed but it was close! Jul 18, 2021
Steven Miller
North Bend, WA
5.10a
[Hide Comment] Pitch 2 is incredible. Definitely a 4 star pitch at any crag. Such a good find! Pitch 4 was pretty cool too. Honestly surprised it took this long to get a new route on dragontail given all the crack systems you can see from Aasgard. A note on the first pitch, the gear is pretty flaring and insecure. Offsets and/or totems would give more confidence. Pitch 5 had lots of loose stuff on it. Though it's kind of a choose your own adventure pitch, so maybe we were off the described route. :shrug: Jul 21, 2021
Steve Shen
Richland, WA
 
[Hide Comment] On the descent, go down one ledge slightly skiers left before taking a right. Stay high-ish and keep going in that direction towards the snowfield walkoff of dragontail. Trying to drop down earlier will result in having to cross the gully at its steepest point and is sketchy. If there's lichen on the rock, you're off trail.

P1 and 2 are great, 4 and 5 are a little on the dirty/loose side but will clean up nicely with all the traffic it's seeing. Agree with comments about P3, it's likely going to be choss forever.

Be ready to dodge raining granola/rocks at the base of P4 if there are people above you, if you are waiting for another party it's probably best to wait at the P3 top-belay spot which is a little offset to the left. Jul 26, 2021
Yiddar S
  5.9-
[Hide Comment] Not sure what a #4 is used for. We did not find it necessary to bring triple on any size, and a #3 is really optional if you are bringing 2 #2s.
None of the moves on p1 is harder than 5.8, protection can be tricky. I placed two .5 and .75 and a .5/.75 offset. Also find offset cams handy on other pitches. Jul 28, 2021
[Hide Comment] Climbed this rig for the second time yesterday. It's cleaning up nicely. The only really loose spot is at the top of the second pitch, as you turn up onto the belay ledge. Rocks dropped here fall off toward the drainage, not the belay, but are still an issue. In terms of grade, the first pitch feels 10- to me. Tricky climbing and gear, and sustained. But a great pitch nonetheless. Aug 29, 2021
kmfoerster
Seattle, Wa
  5.10a
[Hide Comment] Put up a trip report on CascadeClimbers for the route:

cascadeclimbers.com/forum/t… Sep 14, 2021
Kyle Bodamer
  5.9
[Hide Comment] Killer route, climbed it with a double rack from .4 to 3 with singles of small cams below .4. Found that we had plenty of gear left after every pitch and we weren't ever wishing we had more of one particular size. Thanks for putting up a classic route! Aug 5, 2022
Roman Kogan
Seattle, WA
  5.10a
[Hide Comment] Great route, props to the FA team! A bit of perspective from someone who doesn't lead much harder than 10- on gear:

P1 flaring crack features some insecure, technical jamming. More insecure and awkward than powerful. Thoughtful climbing on great rock though. Gear on p1 takes more time/looking to place, but solid placements can be found throughout and all the harder climbing on the pitch can more or less be sewn up. This is especially true if you have some small-medium totems or offset cams. I think 10a is probably justified.

P2 was amazing. Perfect hand jams and finger locks the entire way, with lots of variety and some fun stemming and laybacks thrown in. This pitch is sustained, but definitely felt more 5.9 than 10a.

P3 we found to be better than expected. Some 5.easy climbing brings you to a chossy ledge and a nice zig-zag 5.6 crack with fun movement and decent rock quality.

P4 we moved the belay across the big ledge. We started up some cracks and the short right-facing corner, then followed a short diagonal crack up and left into the main splitter. Main crack was sustained 5.7 with either perfect jams, good feet, or both. Toward the top where it splits, my partner took the right two cracks which had a couple tricky moves and gear. Left crack may possibly be easier? A bit of crispy rock on this pitch, but it should clean up well. Overall another fantastic pitch, almost 60m!

P5 had a mix of fun climbing and choss. Had some runouts, but only on 5.5 or below terrain. Starts up through some class 4 to a shallow right-facing corner and then follows discontinuous cracks to the top. The topout was just about 20' left of the true pinnacle, in a small notch next to a horn/block that can be slung.

Gear: We brought doubles .2-3, with a single .1, some small-medium nuts, and a third .4 and .75-2. This felt pretty perfect for us. Triples in .75-2 made the climb more comfy. I may have used a third .4 once and never placed the .1, so I'd likely leave those next time. We had black-purple totems, which were very useful, especially on P1. A green totem or .5/.75 offset would be handy as well. Definitely no need for a #4.

Descent had a couple tricky 4th class sections getting to the last big ledge, though we may have dropped early. We followed cairns though, so it seems like a number of people had gone this way. Aug 8, 2022
Big Red
Seattle
[Hide Comment] P2 is some of the best crack climbing I've done in a while, and P4 is money as well. The rest is awkward choss. The last pitch is riddled with death blocks/flakes - be very careful. Sep 7, 2022
Ina Enriquez
Leavenworth, Wa
  5.10-
[Hide Comment] I agree that this is a great addition to the area! I found it totally approachable as a C2C mission. In total it took us 15 hours and that included route-finding snafoos and some snack breaks.

I would recommend moving the belay at the base of the 4th pitch to just below the splitter crack. We found that belaying 20ft to the left of the crack system was awkward and presented a huge potential for rope drag. I ended up not placing a piece until I was actually in the crack to avoid the rope drag. Running this out ~20ft off the deck was secure enough but felt unnecessary. Sep 29, 2022
Joe Ludlow
Seattle, WA
 
[Hide Comment] Future ultra classic!! This thing was so ridiculously good. I highly recommend it to everyone. Oct 19, 2022
sean w
Seattle, WA
  5.10a
[Hide Comment] Pitches 2 and 4 are phenomenal, they would be classics at any crag. Pitches 1 and 5 are both relatively heads up in their own way. The first pitch has pretty good quality rock, but the placements are intricate -- often in somewhat flaring and shallow cracks, it's all there though. This pitch also felt a bit more 10- to me, but it's hard to say after that hike in. The last pitch has quite a few loose blocks / flakes that you'll want to avoid using or placing gear behind.

Really fun climbing bottom to top, great work by the FA team! Jun 20, 2023
Jack Guan
Beijing, CN
 
[Hide Comment] p2 and p4 are the gem. There is no need to go down the snow headwall like Dragontail, and we cross a bit snow on Asgard pass in the day when the snow is soft, so crampon is overkill. (I'm particularly cautious so I say microspike is good enough). For descent we traverse SW all the way till it almost at the base then switch back, nothing too sketchy or exposed. Jul 5, 2023
Max Ismailov
Holtsville, NY
  5.9
[Hide Comment] Such an excellent route! Super straightforward, type-1 fun all the way up this thing. Long pitches, solid gear, and minimal choss (except on ledges). You should climb it.

P1 was heady, but has great gear and didnt feel too physical. If P2 was on the lower town wall I think it would vastly exceed Godzilla in popularity Jul 16, 2023
Anastasia Bl
Portland, OR
  5.10-
[Hide Comment] A long walk for this route. P2 and P4 were pretty good though.

p1 - a flaring crack in the middle was awkward and technical (I was happy to have Totems), the upper half was nothing special. 5. 10-

p2 - a sustained 5.9 corner

p3 - multiple variations on the upper half. I went more left, in another flaring crack, to a huge ledge. 5.7

p4 - a great pitch with a big wall feel. It has multiple exits at the top. 5.8

p5 - a loose mediocre 5.7

For the descent, we followed a cairned scramble trail to the dead end which seemed like a very exposed cl. 5.
At which point, we did two 30 m raps off small trees which landed us almost at the top of Assgard pass. Aug 6, 2023
[Hide Comment] An enjoyable route that is quite approachable for the grade. I think pitch 2 best dictates what gear to bring for the whole route due to its length and size consistency. On pitch 2 we used one #3 at the start followed by three #2, three #1s, and three .5s, and a standard double rack of the remaining sizes to choose from. This pitch has spectacular jams the entire way, making it easy to space out your gear if you want to travel with less.

For an alpine route, this climb is pretty damn clean and we didn't encounter choss on any of the pitches. The ledges will have your typical rocks sitting on top, but nothing scary and it is all pretty easy to avoid. We did the route with a 60M rope and had plenty of rope for each pitch. The last pitch only left 5 feet of extra rope.

The true crux of this climb is getting up Aasgard Pass without destroying your calves (I had never been here before). It took us a total of 4:08 to get from the TH to the start of the climb, which included a break at the lake, a trip to the toilet, and refilling water on Aasgard Pass (1 hour of sitting around). My Suunto said 6.55 miles and 4,572' of gain. Aug 9, 2023
Ben Bilbrough
Portland, OR
  5.10b
[Hide Comment] Going against a few people here.

I had just came from Index the day before and cruised PBR (10b) and pitch 1 and 2 of this are harder.

Pitch 1 is flaring weirdness with crap jams and feet and flaring gear.

Pitch 2 has great jams and is physical. Def a 5.10 crack in almost every area around. Used a #4 to protect the initial offwidth and triple #1 and #2 for the rest. Some .75 areas make this section more difficult.

The rest of the pitches seemed to match the grade. I'd maybe call Pitch 4 5.8

The descent we found a little tricky. Went straight down toward the lake for about a hundred feet or so, then trended right for a bit, then up a bit, then more right. Finally follow cairns down and left to get to top of Aasgard.

17.5 hrs C2C Aug 28, 2023
[Hide Comment] Excellent route!

We took a big rack: Triples 0.3 - 2, 2x #3, and a #4, and .3/.4 and .4/.5 offsets. We used it all, and were happy to have it. I'd recommend this approach if 5.10 isn't significantly below your OS grade - The pitches are long and having ample gear kept us climbing quickly and feeling secure. It seems like every pitch of this climb could've taken tons of #1s, so if you want even more security 4-5x #1s would almost certainly be used.

Don't be scared off by the "flaring crack" description of P1. There are plenty of spots to put in gear and sew up the crux, even without any offsets. Just don't expect the parallel sections to be large enough to give you any good jams.

#4 was nice for the start of P2. Smaller gear can be gotten here but you're going to work for it. It was nice to put the #4 in and keep going, keeping the arms fresh for the mega pitch of jamming above.

P4 is the super long perfect crack pitch that you always wanted that last pitch of Outer Space to be!

P5 is looser and dirtier than the rest of the route, but really not bad. If you've done much alpine climbing you've climbed a lot of pitches that were dirtier and looser than this.

We took the clean gully descent described in the route description. Not super difficult but the downclimbing in the gully isn't a gimme. It would probably be easy to find an anchor above the gully and 1-2 raps would get you past the more difficult section.

Huge thanks to the team that put the work in to get this route together - what an incredible addition to Washington climbing. Sep 10, 2023
Martin Hankins
Terrebonne, OR
 
[Hide Comment] For the descent, focusing on traversing SW more than descending kept it well within 3d class territory IMO. After around 750 feet horizontal and maybe 100 vert we made a switchback towards Aagard pass. Sep 18, 2023
Ben S
Portland, OR
 
[Hide Comment] I suppose the thing about this route is everyone who climbs it gives their two cents?

One unique thing about this route is that the comment beta is all over the place, however I found the noncomment beta most accurate/helpful.

We took doubles from 0.2 to 2, one #3, and some tripling around 0.4 - 1. That worked very well. I left my beloved hexes and tricams behind - tricams might've been useful as tripled cam substitutes but hexes not.

I'm new to granite, can usually onsight 10- basalt, and am new to crack, so bear that in mind: I found the first pitch to be pretty easy ("is this the crux? Can't be") and secure to protect. It's just not mindless protection, if you're used to crack. Look around you, it's fine!

Pitch 2, HOO BOY. I'm getting shaky thinking about it! I gave that everything I had. Literally, like if there were a couple more feet of that I would've fallen. I'd rate that 10- if comparing to the 9 cracks around Portland (which there aren't many of). For comparison: I can't climb Dod's Jam (Beacon Rock, 5.10c), but this was far harder than Nosferatu (Klinger, 5.9).

Pitch 3 was a welcome break.

Pitch 4 was life changing, blah blah blah, you've heard it.

Pitch 5, easy climbing but gear was least secure. It was fine though, just make sure you trend gradually left some time after leaving the ground, I had a couple false starts partway up which I retreated from more because I couldn't protect than I couldn't climb.

It's a gem, my friend. Oct 8, 2023