Avg: 3 from 2 votes
|Type:||Boulder, 15 ft (5 m)|
|Page Views:||461 total · 18/month|
|Shared By:||Brad Fauteux on Sep 30, 2018|
|Admins:||BDalhaus, Jay Knower, M Sprague, lee hansche, Jeffrey LeCours, Jonathan Steitzer, Robert Hall|
SNECc is encouraging all climbers to use caution and judgement to ensure they do their part to limit the spread of the coronavirus. Please reference the guidelines provided by the local government, land manager, and LCOs and ensure you have contingency plans if you are unable to maintain social distancing at the area you planned to climb at. For further guidance please reference the guidelines for New England climbers, provided here:
If you come out of the box in this position you will lose the friction and spin-off the boulder, stepping or kicking the slab directly behind will prevent an awkward fall, but could potentially result in a bruised heel(this happened to me on my first session).
Once this sloper is latched properly with the righthand, match and set the left foot in order to make another long tenuous and precarious lock-off out left to a large juggy sidepull in the upper part of the crack. Stay tight and fight another barndoor to match before reaching up righthand to a large pocket. Once on this pocket get a high foot and lock-off all the way up and left to a large jug and the lip of the tall boulder.
This problem is slightly contrived because an easier exit out left exists(Sar-Chasm), but personally this problem, although very difficult, flows naturally and very well and also incorporates a lot of full-body tension and the constant fear of greasing-off of smooth and friction dependent holds similar to "Stegasaurus" and "Lady Slipper".
Sorry for the beta spray down, but the specific line of travel could be confusing otherwise. Climbing the first half of "Sar-Chasm" then heading back right to the sloper for the big lock-off to the crack while avoiding the intro of glassy sidepulls, underclings and heelhooks is not the same problem. That is more of a variation to Sar-chasm that does not flow well but ends with the same sloper lock-off. (This is the only way this problem has been repeated so far, which technically is not a repeat for the second ascent.)