Mountain Project Logo

Routes in The Summit Area

9th Circuit Court of Appeals 10a Dihedral T 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
9th Circuit Court of Appeals 11a finger crack T 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c
9th Circuit Court of Appeals 5.11c S 5.11c 6c+ 24 VIII- 24 E4 6a
Aces High S,TR 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c
Airstream TR 5.12 7b+ 27 VIII+ 26 E6 6b
Arch Crack T,TR 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Crucible T,TR 5.10c 6b 20 VII 20 E2 5b
Dragon Arete TR 5.10d 6b+ 21 VII+ 21 E3 5b
Firefly TR 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Freydis TR 5.11 6c+ 23 VIII- 23 E4 5c
Grainstorm TR 5.12 7b+ 27 VIII+ 26 E6 6b
Headless Horseman, The TR 5.11+ 7a 24 VIII 24 E4 6a V4- 6B
Horse's Rib , The TR 5.9+ 5c 17 VI 17 E1 5a V1-2 5
Horse's shoulder , The TR 5.10 6b 20 VII- 19 E2 5b V3 6A
J.G. Strikes Again TR 5.11a 6c 22 VII+ 22 E3 5c
Leif S 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Not My Problem V2 5+
Ogre T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Pit Bull TR 5.11 6c+ 23 VIII- 23 E4 5c
Renaissance Man V5 6C
Sail, The TR 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Super Chicken T 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a V0 4
Test Tube, The TR 5.11 6c+ 23 VIII- 23 E4 5c
Unknown Lieback TR 5.11a/b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Winnabago V1 5
Type: Boulder
FA: unknown
Page Views: 875 total, 12/month
Shared By: dtomczik on Dec 8, 2011
Admins: Marc Kajut, M. Morley, Adam Stackhouse, Salamanizer suchoski, Justin Johnsen, Vicki Schwantes

You & This Route


8 Opinions

Your To-Do List:

Add To-Do

Your Star Rating:


     Clear Rating

Your Difficulty Rating:


-none- Change

Your Ticks:

Add New Tick
    -none-
Current San Diego County Advisories Details

Description

Short overhanging boulder problem on incut slots

Location

Walking uphill on the road, continue past Airstream for about 50ft. This problem is obscured by a shorter boulder. The problem itself is on the left side of the road (when facing uphill) and is 20ft from the pavement.

Protection

pad

Photos

nds
Oceanside, Ca
  V1-2
nds   Oceanside, Ca
  V1-2
Climbed this yesterday. There is no record of this boulder in the old guides I have, although that doesn't assure it hasn't been done before. The starting holds contain some loose blocks which arguably should be removed. This would enlarge the starting holds and solidify the problem as a powerful v1 in my opinion. Dec 23, 2011
dtomczik
Bishop, CA
 
dtomczik   Bishop, CA
 
We climbed this 3/17/11. If the problem already has a name, please comment. Dec 9, 2011