Mountain Project Logo
To save paper & ink, use the [Hide] controls next to photos and comments so you only print what you need.

Battle of the Bulge

5.8, Trad, 140 ft (42 m),  Avg: 2.7 from 146 votes
FA: unknown
California > Yosemite NP > Tuolumne Meadows > Puppy Dome
Warning Access Issue: Latest updates on closures, permits, and regulations. DetailsDrop down

Description

Pockets in a flared groove lead to perfect jams up to and through the awesome crux bulge before some easier climbing to the top. 

Location

far right side of lower terrace

Protection

all gear, all the time. Gear to 3.5" for anchor, but can get away with <1.5"

Photos [Hide ALL Photos]

Potter soloing the Bulge
[Hide Photo] Potter soloing the Bulge
The glory shot. Jamie LaRochelle pulling the namesake bulge bold Tuolumne style, onsight & ropeless.
[Hide Photo] The glory shot. Jamie LaRochelle pulling the namesake bulge bold Tuolumne style, onsight & ropeless.
Jamie L heading up the pockets on Battle of The Bulge
[Hide Photo] Jamie L heading up the pockets on Battle of The Bulge
On solo
[Hide Photo] On solo
Allison onsighting Battle Of The Bulge.  Jul 2015.
[Hide Photo] Allison onsighting Battle Of The Bulge. Jul 2015.
Friend on Battle of the Bulge
[Hide Photo] Friend on Battle of the Bulge
Andrew belaying.
[Hide Photo] Andrew belaying.
Battle of the bulge 
<br>
Andy at zee bulge
[Hide Photo] Battle of the bulge Andy at zee bulge
View from a ledge
[Hide Photo] View from a ledge
View from the top
[Hide Photo] View from the top
Battle of the bulge
[Hide Photo] Battle of the bulge
a fun and worthwhile route
[Hide Photo] a fun and worthwhile route

Comments [Hide ALL Comments]

camtron Summers
Huntington Beach, Ca
[Hide Comment] no gear for the first 30ft unless you uses some tri-cam. Super fun gets 4 or 5 stars in the supertopo giude. Nov 27, 2010
Kevin Heckeler
Las Vegas, NV
 
[Hide Comment] Second that. First 30 feet very thin on gear and hard enough any 5.8 leader should think twice if they have any doubts. Rest of climb is G and quality. Top rope was a little tricky but only 4th class to access the top of the route. 70m a must for TR. Sep 17, 2011
[Hide Comment] Quality is excellent. Great hand jams half way up. Stiff crux.
We actually top roped it with a 60m rope. I guess it depends how high you put the gear anchor. Aug 6, 2012
Rob Davies UK
Cheshire, UK
  5.8
[Hide Comment] The start looks spooky from below but my leader managed to get lots of reasonable (though maybe not bomb-proof) cams in. The crux is simple using knees! Sep 12, 2012
Vit
[Hide Comment] I found the first 20 ft actually protect quite well with Metolius TCUs. Agreed that 60m minimum is necessary for TR. Class 3 walk-off towards the left at the top. Jun 27, 2013
rl23455
Portland, OR
  5.8
[Hide Comment] I had no trouble placing gear first 30 feet. I do remember running out of cams for the route, getting real creative at the end. Mar 30, 2014
Jan Tarculas
San Diego, Ca
  5.8
[Hide Comment] Not R rated like supertopo book suggest. Agree with Vit regarding first 20 ft. protects really well with TCUs. My first piece was a red TCU that was actually hard to get out on the rappel. 2nd piece was an orange TCU then after are finger to hand size placements.

I think a 5.8 leader doesn't need to think twice about this route. Good pin scars for holds and good feet while placing gear down low. Crux is at top pulling pass a bulge. No need to use knees, use that hand and toe jam. Jul 5, 2015
Sean
Oak Park, CA
[Hide Comment] bomber tricams for the start, and cams as well. route description could do without the "halfway" crux beta instructional spray, which may well differ from what others consider the crux anyway Jul 19, 2015
Nate Manson
San Diego, CA
  5.8
[Hide Comment] This was a fun, somewhat varied climb. The climb has ample opportunities for protection the entire way. I got a bomber blue/yellow offset mastercam in the first 8 feet or so. Although, a regular cam of similar size would have worked fine, this climb simply doesn't warrant the R that Supertopo gives it, not even a PG13.

I actually felt the 5.8 moves were pretty soft for the area, don't hesitate on this one. Sep 1, 2015
Mike Womack
Orcutt, CA
 
[Hide Comment] I used small cams for the start (.5 and .75 BD I believe). With good small cams, this is a very safe climb. Enjoy! Jul 25, 2017
John Clark
Reno, NV
  5.7+
[Hide Comment] First time I've used my C4s passively. Cam em, stick em in the holes, and enjoy not being run out in the first 40' Jul 16, 2018
Sean Sullivan
Idyllwild, CA
 
[Hide Comment] I didn't think the bottom of this climb was severely runout. Some weird placements in pin scars (passive C4s) but solid. Fun climb! Jul 30, 2018
Byron Krempl
Twain Harte
[Hide Comment] The "unprotectable" pods protect super easily with totems. No runout whatsoever! Jun 6, 2022