Type: Trad, Alpine, 600 ft, 5 pitches, Grade II
FA: Bradley Gilman and Hassler Whitney, 1929
Page Views: 80,646 total · 536/month
Shared By: Robert Hall on Oct 12, 2006 with updates from Northeast Alpine Start
Admins: Jay Knower, M Sprague, lee hansche, Jeffrey LeCours, Jonathan Steitzer, Robert Hall

You & This Route

423 Opinions

Your To-Do List:

Add To-Do · View List

Your Star Rating:

     Clear Rating

Your Difficulty Rating:

-none- Change

Your Ticks:

Add New Tick

Approach & Description

[Revised description, with History added 11/28/17]
Whitney Gilman climbs the prominent ridge on the left side of Cannon. Interesting climbing, great belay ledges and incredible exposure make this climb a classic one. Edging up the well defined arete is an experience unique to New Hampshire climbing. There is no 5.7 more exposed than the WG.

The climb has NO FIXED ANCHORS at belays (although there is/was (2013) a 2-bolt emergency rap station in the vicinity of the end of P2). There are a few fixed pitons, and those that do exist are decades old. If you don’t have a hard hat, beg, borrow, steal, or buy one for this route.

There are many more potential belay stances than are listed in the route description. The route description is written to be a way to climb the route, not "THE" way. This is a very popular route; if you find you have the route to yourself try pinching yourself, you may be dreaming!

Approach: The approach is long. Expect about one hour of hiking. Park at the “Trailhead Parking” on the south-bound side of “Rt 93” about ½ mile south of the Tramway and the “Old Man Viewpoint”. [“U-turn” here if you’re going northbound.] Register at the box, (don’t forget to sign OUT at the end of the day) and walk south along the paved bike path (passing one “false trail” by a large boulder) to the path with a log and cairn. (see photo). The most common error is to walk too far and hike up the “down” trail. (see photo of “down” trail) Don’t hike up the “down” trail; it puts you WAY out of position on the talus. Follow the well-worn “up-trail” to the talus, then cairns across and up the talus. ONCE AT THE TALUS LINE, LOOK BACKWARDS FREQUENTLY SO YOU CAN FIND THE OPENING TO THE TRAIL FROM THE TALUS; if you back off the climb for any reason, you’ll be VERY happy to be able to hike back on the trail, rather than bushwhack!
See also the alternate approach beta (below Description)


The Ridge START- Scramble up 15 ft to the very front of the buttress where a 3-4” vertical crack splits the face. [Var 1, 2]

P1 - Pitch 1 usually climbs the crack directly from the bottom (about 5.7, bring at least a #3 Camalot), or you can start on the face to the right and climb up about 8 ft to a horizontal and then hand traverse left ( reported to be about 5.5 -5.6) into the vertical crack. Continue up the crack system, moving slightly leftwards as the corner veers right. Belay at the base of a clean right-facing corner/vertical crack with old cams “fixed”. (or combine with P2) about 120 -140 ft, maybe more, 5.7 ,
[Note: The “fixed” cams are probably due to leader falls on “tipped out” cams, since the left-hand crack is substantially harder than the “unlikely looking”, but easier, right hand crack/flake.]

P2 –Climb the right-hand edge of the flake/crack, step left to the top of the flake and then move left and up on “unlikely looking” but easy climbing. Then move up and left on much easier terrain and belay about anywhere. Most will try to get close to the “V-groove” one of the key features of the next pitch. If you are doing the 5.8 “exposure” variation [Var. 3] a good belay is on a bushy ledge a few feet up and right. P2 is about 70 – 100 ft 5.5

P3 –Up into the brown rock “V-groove” with pitons ( 5.6) ; [ The “V-groove” has become more difficult than in the “earlier days” of the W-G.] Exit left, and move up into where rockfall has changed the route even more. [NOTE: If you make P3 very short (or P2 long) and set a belay at the start of the rockfall area, you avoid crossing the potentially lose rock which lies pretty much directly above your belayer.] 80-90 ft 5.6 (130-140 ft 5.6 -5.7 to upper belay)

P4 –If you have belayed at the left end of the rockfall area, move right, with some awkward moves, (and rope drag) across the rockfall area to the base of the block with double cracks. Gain the top of the block via your choice of the 4-5” off-width crack or the 1”-2” crack. [NOTE: If you chose the 4-5” crack, beware getting your knee jammed in the crack, the cause of at least one rescue.] Now move out onto the north face for the “Pipe Pitch”. With so much exposure it’s hard to say the “stance” at the pipe is slightly claustrophobic but it is. Three pins, and cracks for wire nuts, mark the way ahead. Footing fades and the trick is to move left onto the face for good hands and feet at the last minute. (Somewhat height related) [NOTE: If you think your second may have trouble here, you can belay just above, a bit on the right.] Otherwise, continue up and right, momentarily out on the north face again, and then up a belay. 120-130 ft 5.7 – 5.7+ (about 30 ft shorter if starting from the beginning of the rockfall area.)

NOTES: 1) Variation 3 [described later] ends here at the belay just above the pipe. 2) The pipe is not the original pipe but was replaced after the original “went missing”. 3) The “baby angle” piton, high above the pipe, was driven in Nov 1967 and has held at least one leader fall since then!

P5 –Move up and then left across a large (20ft x 20ft) sloping slab to the base of a beautiful dihedral / crack. [ possible belay here] . Up the dihedral on really fun climbing, then back out on the north face again, and then up and left to a almost flat slab and establish a belay. 100-120 ft 5.5

P6 – Move diagonally left and up for 25-30 ft (occasional piton on the way) to a sort of triangular stance at the base of a shallow dihedral. Directly up this (5.7) past a few pitons (Back ‘em up!) to the top. 70-90 ft 5.7  [At one time the triangular stance held 1 ½ to 2 feet of rock blocks, so you stood much higher, making the crux first moves of the dihedral much easier!]  Recent [2016-2018] reports (see COMMENTS) are that the flakes in this final dihedral are sounding more and more "hollow". TAKE CARE, and climb "softly", i.e no great pulling outwards. 

Bottom Section - W-G Ridge

Variation 1 to the START – This was the “normal” start during the 1960’s and 70’s. Walk up the talus 75 +/- feet beyond the ridge start to a gully in the north wall. Up this, stepping onto a slab at about 70ft, and then back left to a chimney-like formation. Exit east (left) out of the chimney and up an easy section of rock to the belay at the top of P1. 80-100 ft 5.4 +/- (infrequently done now, so there may have been some change)

Variation 2 to the START – Little climbed, but an interesting route, especially if considered as a start to Variation#3 (?!) The F.A. went at 5.7 A-1 or A-2; has it been done free? START - Above Variation #1, and about 20 ft below where the Black Dike enters the talus, go directly up a series of cracks and features to where a large block juts out left and “caps” the line. The F.A. used aid in the crack at the block’s bottom to exit left. One might think it should go free as an undercling traverse. Descend a bit to reach the belay at the end of P2. 110-120 ft 5.7 A-1 / A-2

Variation 3 – The “5.8 Exposed Crack Variation” (?) If you think the “pipe pitch” is exposed this one is sure to grab your attention……On P2 of the normal route (or just above where “Var#2” ends) once you are above the flake/crack and the “unlikely looking but easy climbing”, move up and right to establish a belay below a vertical crack. The variation (P3) starts by climbing the vertical crack (5.8), then makes a mantel (possible intermediate belay) and continues past a spike and a left-facing corner on the north wall (5.7 / 5.7+) to reach the ledge below the pipe. Belay here, or continue up the “Pipe Pitch”, up past the pipe to the small belay mentioned at the end of P4 of the normal route. 165 ft (+/- depending on belay) 5.8 and “5.7+ wild” .

There are variations at the top of the climb, some are mentioned in the COMMENTs.


Walk straight up into the woods on a well worn trail. The trail heads left and downhill. After a considerable amount of walking, you will reach the bike path. The trail does not go back to the base, so do not leave gear there.


Standard light rack to 3" (#3 Camalot-sized). Wire nuts are helpful, especially to back-up the pins on the Pipe pitch. The 4+inch wide crack below the pipe pitch can be proteced in a smaller crack on its right, or bring along a #4 or #5.

There are many fixed pins en route, so bring a number of slings. One rope is fine. If it is necessary to rap, one rope will get you down since there are so many ledges. You will need to leave gear, as there are no fixed anchors. Also, a helmet is mandatory.

Alternate Approach Beta

NEAlpineStart has suggested that it might be better to approach the WG Ridge from the Lafayette Place Campground to the south. Take the bike path north, pass the W-G descent trail and continue on to the normal W-G ascent trail. (see photos). If you're only gunning for the WG, this makes sense, as when you come down the campground is a short walk downhill along the bike path from the descent trail. Still, 99% of the climbers attempting the WG still use the northern lot.


Five decades before the introduction of “sticky rubber” and 25 years before Vibram rubber, Hassler Whitney and Bradley Gilman made the first ascent on Aug. 3rd, 1929. Using the short, natural-fiber ropes of the day (read “rope breaks with any leader fall”), the ascent was done in 17 pitches. No pitons were used for belays, nor for intermediate protection.

The original pipe was installed by Ken Henderson, probably on the 3rd or 4th ascent (Of course, he led the 2nd ascent). The idea was that the rope between belayer and climber would be draped around the pipe, thus providing a “protection” point….of course the “draping” also provided plenty of slack!...BUT, if the pipe didn’t “pull” the rope would run over the relatively smooth rock where the pipe had been driven, instead of over the rough and sharp edge of the ridge itself, thus giving the chance the rope would not break.

Was it easier then? According to G. & L. Waterman in their excellent history of Northeast climbing “Yankee Rock and Ice”, Whitney likened the difficulty to the Alps’ Grepon, about an “old school” 5.6. The Watermans mention changes (between 1929 and 1992) that increased the difficulty. Since this climber first climbed the route in 1966, I have seen changes in the first pitch, the third pitch (the V-groove pitch) and the last pitch increase those pitch difficulties from 5.5-5.6 to 5.7, from 5.5 to 5.6, and from 5.4-5.5 to 5.6-5.7, respectively. The “off width”, leading up to the “pipe pitch” has gone from an “easy” foot-and-hand/fist 2” jam crack (actually smaller than 2” since a 2” bong-piton fit perfectly) to today’s “knee catching” size. However, to me, the “pipe pitch” seems unchanged in that time frame. My opinion: the climb as a whole has gotten more difficult, but the crux remains about the same as 50 years ago.


If you have fantasies of serious alpinism, then a winter ascent of the Whitney Gilman Ridge is the ticket. As an aspiring alpinist, I did the route in January, 1979, in very dry but cold conditions. Then, just a few weeks ago, when I foolishly scheduled an ice climbing trip to New England for early January, I did it again, this time with fairly warm conditions (mid-thirties), but with verglas here and there to keep things interesting. The terrain on the route reminded me of crux sections of some of the great alpine routes in the Alps and Canadian Rockies -- great position and when the cracks have snow and ice in them, you'll need to draw on a whole range of tricks to get through the steep sections. Feb 10, 2007
Oakland Park, Florida
Floridaputz   Oakland Park, Florida
I think you want to be first in line on this one. The climb is loose for the most part but punctuated by awesome climbing in exposed sections. The flake below the metal pole is spectacular. The cruxes are all solid and fun. The views of Canon Mt are exceptional. Perfect climb for the weekend warrior (like me) A quick walk off makes this a fun affair. May 14, 2007
lee hansche
goffstown, nh
lee hansche   goffstown, nh  
Quick walk off... are we thinking of the same route... i guess these things are relative, but the walk off is the reason i only climb at cannon once in a while... im a wimp when it comes to hiking... Jul 12, 2007
I avoided this climb for years, primarily because of its reputation as a crowded moderate with high rockfall potential. Big mistake. With an early start on a Monday, we were all alone on this fun route. The exposure makes the moderate grade very satisfying and the scenery is fabulous. The recommended light rack to 3" is right on -- I read somewhere that a #4 Camelot was useful, but it ended up just being dead weight for me. Aug 29, 2007
Dominic Albanese
Baltimore, MD
Dominic Albanese   Baltimore, MD
Highly recommend doing the 5.8 crack/corner on the 3rd? pitch. Eats two #1 camalots and puts you a great ledge on the overhanging right face a little earlier. A nice face pitch links into the pipe pitch from here.
Staying right higher up 5.8+ also yields some nicer rock. Took 3 tries to finally get a good day to do this one and will always remember it. A truly great route with a feeling hard to get east of the rockies. Nov 7, 2007
Mike Caruso
Mike Caruso  
In 1998, the 5.8+/5.9 finish through the v-groove off the featureless slab had a loaf of bread size loose block that had to be maneuvered around at the crux. It probably upped the grade a bit, but it was an exciting finish to this great line. Of course my party advised me to lead that alternate finish because it was easy! Mar 13, 2008
Jay Knower
Campton, NH
Jay Knower   Campton, NH  
It's easy to get off route on the WG. When people get off route, they are almost always too far left. So, if you are comfortable on 5.8ish terrain, I'd say that you should always choose the right option if confronted with a routefinding choice.

If you go way left, you'll end up in a vertical scree field; however, too far right will take you around the corner onto the Across the Great Divide face (A4). It's unlikely that, while free climbing, you would find yourself on A4 territory.

So, on the WG, be like John McCain, and keep heading right. Jul 16, 2008
Sandwich, NH
matthewWallace   Sandwich, NH
I did this route two summers back (2006) with Jim Shimberg. This was my first multi-pitch experience. I found this route to be very enjoyable and although I wasn't leading when removing the placements they seemed very safe, he rock wasn't overly lose but I suspect that over the summer it cleans up with more traffic. The 5.8 crack was awesome and at the top Jim Shimberg decided that instead of going around to the left that he would go straight over the top, this translated into 5.9 moves, and me taking a fall at 590 feet, that was a shocker, but this variant was fun and protected but a small nut, so if you are feeling zealous I would suggest this variant. when you reach the top do not forget to enjoy the view. Dec 28, 2008
lee hansche
goffstown, nh
lee hansche   goffstown, nh  
Found some pretty good footage of the route on you tube:
youtube.com/watch?v=VGlbB6y… May 2, 2009
bradley white
bradley white   Bend
Did the ridge May 24, 09. I placed some of the pins especially third pitch about 15+yrs. ago. The pins are beginning to look like body weight only protection. Also these pins are likely to brake off during attempted replacement. Houston, we have a problem. Aren't much options left up there. Climbers should climb for climbing sake and experienced parties are a must now in my opinion. The rock shouldn't handle be nailed at the top. I wouldn't expand any rock up there. Besides that we were a party of three that had a wonderful day. May 25, 2009
E thatcher
Plymouth/ North Conway (NH)
E thatcher   Plymouth/ North Conway (NH)
I think the route is worth doing, but must say I was disappointed. I was expecting a classic climb and long multi pitch experience akin to my experiences on Moby. We did the climb in 2 and a short pitch, took us about 2 hours and 40 minutes from car to top, and I thought there was maybe 60 ft total of fun exposed climbing. True there were good ledges, and yes it was on Cannon which was cool. But it just didn't live up to the hype for me. Sep 10, 2009
Newmarket, NH
nhclimber   Newmarket, NH
It may not be the sickest clean route in the world, but it is a fantastic piece of history. And when compared to other ridge climbs it's classic. I don't climb it every year, but I look forward every time. It's also very similar to the rest of cannon moderates, as in shorter pitches broken up by gravely ledges. It reminds of climbing in the winds or other things out west, semi-technical climbing interspersed with technical climbing to get to the top of a feature. Sep 11, 2009
john strand
southern colo
john strand   southern colo
my first lead in NH, 11/77. I'm not a big fan of Moby Grape (except Reppy's) and think this is a better route. Feb 17, 2010
Nick W
Orford, NH
Nick W   Orford, NH
If you have double 60m ropes, you can do this climb in 3 long, high quality pitches in a relatively short amount of time. For a more sustained line (if you are solid on 5.8) you can start at the left-hand corner-crack start and climb all the way to the second large ledge at the base of the 5.8 handcrack pitch. From there, pitch 2 climbs the hand crack on the right, then goes up super steep, exposed blocks around to the right, then straight up through the pipe pitch to belay on a nice ledge on the left side of the arete. Then, traverse left to the nice ledge below the beautiful fin, up the fin, than straight up the arete to the top in one long third pitch, taking the 5.8/5.9 variation. These last two pitches are exposed and have some potentially loose rock, but have very exciting climbing, and are direct; with caution they can be safely negotiated. The last pitch right hand variation, in my opinion is not a lot harder than the 5.7 standard finish, with comparable protection. Doubles up to #2 Camalot is all that I placed. May 14, 2010
bradley white
bradley white   Bend
Big rock slide from above the Cannonade Buttress. There are lots of new boulders on the trail. Jun 6, 2010
Englewood, CO
tscupp   Englewood, CO
I just wanted to add a little bit of info that comes from the Sykes guidebook. For the first pitch, which as Jay mentions feels harder than 5.4, it is 5.6 directly up the corner with the 5.6 move being in the first few feet before you reach the horizontal cracks - it can be a little unnerving as this part is sometimes damp and needs wider gear. To keep it at 5.4 or 5.5, hand traverse in from the right.

On pitch 2, the guidebook indicates that the right exposed crack is 5.6 and the left is 5.7 though the left looks FAR more doable and obvious with chalk and a pin - to me it is the most strenuous part of the entire route (even having done the 5.8 3rd pitch) - but I've never done the right crack so it is hard to compare.

These aren't major variations or changes, but I found knowing these spots were a bit harder than I initially figured they would be very helpful. Aug 2, 2010
Pete W  
My partner and I were the first party up WG on Saturday (7/30/11), we were in the clouds for much of the climb.

For any 5.8/9 or higher leaders out there, heed the recommendations of a light rack. I decided to take doubles of nearly everything and regret it. While I didn't link pitches together, I often only used 4-5 pieces per pitch. Most of the climbing is much easier stuff between the harder sections. I felt very comfortable running out 30 feet or more in some spots since the terrain was easy in many places. For the crux pitches, especially the pipe pitch variation I placed more, but there are so many pro options that a double rack probably isn't necessary. Belays are pretty spacious for the most part.

Bottom line, a single rack of cams, set of nuts, and pink thru blue tricams is what I'd bring on my next ascent. Leaders where 5.7/8 is your limit, you might feel more comfortable with more gear. Aug 1, 2011
Berkeley, CA
lperitz22   Berkeley, CA
Detailed route description here:
chauvinguides.com/gilmangui… Aug 25, 2011
This route needs to be trundled again (everywhere). The ledge above the v-groove is full of terrifying loose blocks. To avoid this step right immediately at the top of the v-groove (careful of loose holds) and up to the off width belay, or take the 5.8 variation. Aug 21, 2012
Robert Hall
North Conway, NH
  5.7 PG13
Robert Hall   North Conway, NH  
  5.7 PG13
I climbed this route for the first time in about 35 years this past Monday. A Monday and we left the car at 9am and were 3rd on the route. Took the "front crack" start- and I thought I was getting old and weak until I read Marc Chauvin's description, he felt it was 5.7 ( as I did, 'crux' low, before easy protection). Much has changed in 35+ yrs. The "V" groove on P3 is more way more awkward; the 5"-6" off-width on P4 used to be only 2" wide and an easy jam, especially with boots. On the last pitch, after the traverse left, the inside corner started "on a pile of rubble"; the rubble is now gone and as a result to initial moves up the corner are now much harder, 5.7 vs. 5.4 or so. Plus, the 5.7 move(s) are on less-than-the-most-secure flakes.
BTW-I didn't notice too many "terrifying" lose blocks on the ledge above the "V" groove and we actually belayed here. In general, I felt the route was pretty much fairly clean for a "mountain" route. Sep 24, 2013
Peter Lewis
Bridgton, ME
Peter Lewis   Bridgton, ME
Just to clear up a little history: the pipe that is now in situ on the famous "Pipe Pitch" is not the pipe pounded in by the FA party. Pipes have come and gone over the years, and the original pipe is probably in the corner of a garage somewhere. So, don't think you're girth-hitching a historical artifact when you wrap the pipe (and you will wrap the pipe, if the current incarnation is sticking out far enough), but it is in the same place and the whole situation is just plain amazing. Oh, and there is a knee-sized crack in a block just before the pipe pitch; and yes, your knee may well fit in it, and you may feel a certain temptation to do that. But please, for the sake of the poor slobs who will have to come up later that evening lugging a grease gun and a crow bar, DON'T DO IT! Feb 6, 2014
M Sprague
New England
M Sprague   New England  
But are those pitons any good? Between rusting out, freeze thaw and loose rock, it pays to be skeptical. Feb 20, 2014
bradley white
bradley white   Bend
the pins are relics or untrustworthy Apr 26, 2014
SP Boston
Watertown, MA
  5.7 PG13
SP Boston   Watertown, MA
  5.7 PG13
For those interested in an updated route overview, we enclose it below. Climbed WG on June 1 in perfect weather with nobody else on the route, which is unusual for a Sunday in June. Details:

Approach: 50 minutes of huffing and puffing, much more if you get off trail or didn't get your mountain goat badge in Boy Scouts. The trail from the bike path is clearly marked with fallen logs and large branches suggesting you NOT proceed up the path, however this IS the path you want!

Overview: I packed a lighter rack than normal, but still had too much gear for this fourth or fifth trip up WG. I took four small aliens, four small metolius cams, and two each camelots from 3/4 to 2 inch. Used a 3 inch in one place, but not critical. There are over a dozen pins on the route, maybe more. Some look very solid, some are very sketchy. It appears that some inventive slings and biners have been installed that would allow a (safe?) rap retreat now, something that I had not seen before.

Pitch One: we used the horizontal about 8 feet above to traverse into the wider crack/corner. Looks hard, but the horizontal is great for the hands and eats pro. Continue up the crack system, moving slightly rightwards as the corner veers off left. Belay from the base of a clear vertical crack, right facing corner with tons of locked up cams from yesteryear. 5.5, 70'

Pitch Two: climb the steep slightly awkward crack (don't trust those old rusted camelots), moving right briefly for easier climbing, standing on the point at the top, and traversing left and up to much easier terrain. Belay at the newly set up escape rap on cozy ledge. 5.5, 70'

Pitch Three: move up and left on easier rock and set up a belay station at an obvious ledge. Easier climbing here. 5.4, 70'

Pitch Four: move up and left through pins, then onto a clean surface where major rockfall has changed the route dramatically from ten years ago. Some slightly awkward moves bring you up and back to the right where you get onto the gorgeous belay ledge at the base of the double cracks. Some reports suggest avoiding this area because of loose rock, but we did not encounter anything worrisome, and the climbing is good. 5.5, about 80'

Pitch Five: (Pipe pitch). Move up the double cracks (awkward unless you love foot jambs) to a nice stance. Use large horizontals and features to work another ten feet up and right. You should see the pipe in front of you, about chest level. Mantle up with a little balance from hands, and stand in the slightly claustrophobic pocket area above the pipe. Three pins ahead mark the way. Footing fades, and the trick is to traverse left onto the face for good feet and hands at the last minute. Lots of exposure. 5.7, 70'

Pitch Six: this is an easy set of moves upward and left until you find yourself on a large shelf with an obvious narrow crack (left facing corner system) directly overhead. Small aliens for a nice belay station. Twenty foot traverse for follower is protected by a reasonable quality pin. Feet are good. 5.5, 65'

Pitch Seven: my favorite pitch actually. Move up the obvious thin crack, then left and up through a pin onto a small ledge with slightly intimidating climbing ahead. Three pins mark the way. Stemming works well, and hand holds magically appear right where you need them. Once through the hard stretch, some easy climbing to the obvious top out. 5.7, 140'

We moved slowly and did the climb in seven separate pitches, all in 3 and one half hours.

One part of the trail down can be easily missed due to the way bushes have grown. If you hit a dead end just backtrack a tiny bit and try going upward to reconnect to the trail. Hike out is HARD and takes at least an hour. Again, the mountain goat badge will come in handy.

An amazing New England climb and a must-do for a full day's wilderness experience. Jun 2, 2014
Steven James
Portland, Maine
Steven James   Portland, Maine
Some helpful, wish I had known information on the whitney-gilman approach.

If you find yourself heading up the walk-off it will be tempting to step out onto the talus field and want to traverse towards where you climb. This is a bad idea. Turn around, go back to the bike path, go north, (left)to the actual trail (marked by a cairn as of 6/11/14) and just go up that way.

Trust me. This one questionable decision made our day significantly longer and more treacherous than it needed to be. Still had a great day. Jun 12, 2014
Robert Hall
North Conway, NH
  5.7 PG13
Robert Hall   North Conway, NH  
  5.7 PG13
Since the correct trail UP to the W-G seems to be an issue, I have posted photographs of the correct UP and DOWN trails...hope this helps. [also the previous 2 comments abut this were deleted as part of a 'general cleanup' of older comments.] Aug 14, 2014
Derek Jf
Derek Jf   Northeast
Climbed great, loved the exposure over the Black Dike!
Grave yard of gear up there though especially C4 cams. Saw 1 purple .5, 2 green .75s and a yellow 2 buried carelessly in cracks on different pitches and left for dead. A couple old nuts wedged fixed into place too.
Word to the wise; when you place gear on this route, be sure its in a crack that has room to accept it - all the stuck cams were in cracks barely wide enough for them to fit in while fully drawn open. Plan to take your shiny expensive gadgets home when placing! No wiggle room left for these pro when trying to free any of them to clean off Sep 8, 2014
Holland, VT
TSluiter   Holland, VT
Awesome climb, really really fun. A few 5.7 areas, the rest is pretty casual and easily protected. A few areas will feel harder from the exposure, but theres a lot of 'save-your-life' jugs along the way. Even the 5.8 pipe pitch is heady but not all too hard.

The last pitch has a funky shelf to step up on near the start and the rock, which should provide a nice undercling, is very very loose. The group behind us broke a piece off, I'm sure much of it will come off soon, it will probably make the last pitch a little more stout, depending on what remains. Sep 28, 2015
Northeast Alpine Start
Conway, New Hampshire
Northeast Alpine Start   Conway, New Hampshire
Detailed trip report with photos here

Trip Report

Of note is approaching from the parking at Lafayette Place (from the south) is better than approaching from the traditional climbers parking lot. Details in Trip Report Nov 5, 2015
Sam Fox
Burlington, VT
  5.7+ PG13
Sam Fox   Burlington, VT
  5.7+ PG13
Hey all,
Since my first trip to Cannon in 2013 I've done the WGR ~10 times. I've done every variation, including the absurdly hard "5.9" variation that goes right around the ridge into the black dike for the final pitch. I've climbed all over the US and this is my favorite climb anywhere..

For confident climbers I would suggest a single rack from .2-#2 (camalot sizes), and maybe 6 nuts from #4BD to #9BD. If you'd like some extra security doubles of .4-.75 will ensure you have plenty of pro beneath you and plenty of pro for a belay. I never carry a #3 unless I'm linking with Moby Grape, then two hang on the back of my harness uselessly for the entire climb..

My favorite way to climb the WGR is to link the first two pitches (easy with a 70m) then link the 5.8 variation to the pipe pitch, and finally link the last two pitches. Lots of good climbing that goes quickly.

I'd also like to say, the whole climb is PG / PG13. The 5.8 variation is 5.7R. All the crux moves are fairly well protected, but there are numerous times when you're making 5.5-5.6 moves over rusty pins that are literally worthless. The tip of the "Pitch 2" flake is one of these times. I personally would be willing to replace all of these pins if anyone can tell me how to get the old ones out without snapping them off. Jan 29, 2016
john strand
southern colo
john strand   southern colo
Good luck witht that one Sam ! personally I think ALL the fixed gear should be removed . Jan 30, 2016
Our perspective at the top of Pitch #3 when we did this last October. It was a COLD day!

youtube.com/watch?v=vhJO5_H… Jun 4, 2016
Did this for the first time since I was 11 today and had a fantastic time. A few notes that I would pass on are that...
-Once on the ridge route finding is fairly straight forward so don't let fears of ending up stranded in no mans land keep you away.
-The belay above the splitter 5.8 variation is mainly around a very large block that vibrates noticeably when kicked. I doubt it is going anywhere and don't regret using it, but something to keep in mind (you can get a small piece like a black tricam into a different section of rock as well).
-The steep wall that takes you to the pipe on the 5.8 variation has loose blocks that look like great holds in a few places, take care to check your holds and be solid at the grade of 5.7 (very fun climbing)
-There is no real need for a #3 if you are solid at the grade.
-You really can't beat the exposure the G provides anywhere else in NE.

Have fun out there! Jun 30, 2016
Alex Jacques
Burlington, CT
Alex Jacques   Burlington, CT
After the pipe pitch if you stay on the arête you'll see a manky pin on the north side (shade), this leads the way to an exciting and super exposed variation that protects well and gives you full value. Do it and trust, it goes. Sep 18, 2016
Silas Miller
Conway, NH
Silas Miller   Conway, NH
While the route is undeniably cool, I don't think I will ever climb the pipe pitch again. I've climbed some loose stuff, but this tops the list. Some poor soul is going to fall on one of those ancient pitons, or worse a cam placed behind any of the blocks, and 150ft of this route is going to come down. I know tons of people climb it every day, and will continue to, but that just means someone is going to be in the wrong spot when the Jenga pile releases. It's just the fact that it's not a couple loose blocks, but and entire pitch of small, vetically oriented blocks stacked on more blocks. When one goes, they are all going! I just wanted to put that out there, I'm going around next time. Nov 22, 2016
Jonathan Steitzer
West Lebanon, NH
Jonathan Steitzer   West Lebanon, NH  
Trust the pitons, they're good. A few aren't great but most are solid and we'll placed with only cosmetic rust.

I've taken falls on worse looking pins in Mexico, and they're as solid as the one on the Saigons at Cathedral.

As of July 30th, 2017, most of the pitons on the main route are solid and should give you confidence. Jul 6, 2017
Sean M
Sean M  
Fun climb, great exposure at the grade. Biggest fear is yanking off a hold and falling a ways because you hadn't placed a piece in a while due to rock quality or easy climbing. Place often and enjoy. Aug 10, 2017
I did this route as a teenager in 1976 with my original climbing partner, Andrew Kaplan. It was our first alpine adventure. We reclimbed the WG on August 21 (solar eclipse day), 41 years later, and it was as good as we remembered it. We lucked out and had phenomenal weather: we climbed in t-shirts and shorts. Here are my thoughts on the route as it currently exists:

We found the tip to park and hiked from the Lafayette campground to be a good idea - definitely shorter and faster. We climbed on a Monday, leaving the campground at 8:30 AM. We had the route to ourselves until we were already halfway up. The advice to take a light rack, with lots of runners and biners, and spot on. I brought 3 Tricams, stoppers, a mixture of C-4s and X-4s from .3 to 3, with doubles in the .5 to 2 range. we clipped the fixed pins when they looked "good" (a relative term) or there was nothing else.

We started the climb by traversing in from the right along the horizontal crack. Very fun and some of the best rock on the climb. We did the climb in pitches following the 5.7 grade.

The climb is lots of fun, but definitely alpine in character. There is a boatload of questionable rock (part of the "fun")which requires care and decision-making, and, given the grade, sketchy protection. Not a good climb if 5.7 is near your limit or you are new to trad leading. But this is climb that definitely should be on everyone's tick list.

Sep 19, 2017
Kurt G.
Reading, PA
Kurt G.   Reading, PA
just wondering what the best guidebook is for this climb/area for a first time visit here? Dec 13, 2017
Robert Hall
North Conway, NH
  5.7 PG13
Robert Hall   North Conway, NH  
  5.7 PG13
The best current guidebook for the Franconia (Cannon)-Crawford Notch areas is The Notches by Jon Sykes (eaglecliffpub.com). It does not cover the mostly-sport area of Rumney which has it's own guidebook. Further east in the North Conway and Kancamangus area(s) the best guide is North Conway Rock Climbs by Jerry Handren.

If you like history, try to get an out-of-print Ed Webster Guide to the White Mtns East . Dec 13, 2017
Luke Fagan   MA
Thoughts on using a 40 m rope for this climb? Apr 19, 2018
Van Go  
I found a pretty nice mountaineering glove a bit down the scree from the base of this route. It was late spring last year. Sorry to wait so long. Time flies! PM with the description of what and which glove if you lost one and still want it back and I'll see if I can get it back to you. Apr 19, 2018
Robert Hall
North Conway, NH
  5.7 PG13
Robert Hall   North Conway, NH  
  5.7 PG13
Re 40m rope: Certainly do-able with this length (about 135 ft) but you'd probably want to take along a 7 or 8 mm tag line in case you wanted to rap off for any reason; making 20m raps to get off (while it probably could be done with much leaving of gear) would be pretty epic. If you're looking to do it with a shorter rope, (? to save weight on the approach??) the shortest rope I'd take without a "tag line" would be a 50m. Apr 20, 2018
Classic line, lots of loose rock but careful climbing will mitigate risk. A confident party will be fine with a single rack #.2-2 camalots but might need to utilize more questionable pins than you'd like. Carrying doubles in the #.2-1 camalot range will prevent you from relying on many pins as many of the most solid placements are in very thin cracks. The pipe pitch could protect well with a 0 or 00 c3 where the only other options are old pins and tedious nut placements. It pays to know what gear you will need for each anchor if you're trying to move efficiently.

P1 anchor: #.4-.75 camalots
P2 anchor: I usually sling a solid block on the lower right portion of the ledge but options are abundant
P3 anchor (right side of the ledge above v-groove): #.75-1 camalots
P4 anchor (immediately above pipe pitch crux): #.75-1 camalots
P5 anchor (base of corner): #.2-.4 camalots
P6 anchor: #.5-1 camalots May 17, 2018
Meh. I did Moby Grape last spring and just did Whitney Gilman this past weekend. W-G isn't even comparable. It's more of an interesting history lesson than an enjoyable climb. The Pipe Pitch is cool, though. So is the dihedral/crack after it and any time you pop over to the North side.

Some questionable large flakes and blocks that someone might end up riding some day. Pull gently and think light thoughts.

You can get away with a light rack: singles from .3-1 with optional doubles in .5-1 and a set of small to medium stoppers. I saw no point in bringing a 3 or larger. We did the direct start, standard route, and direct finish. I really wish we had done the 5.8 variation to the pipe.

As of May 21/18 the approach is still reliably located by the large log and carin. Couple sucker carins on the talus field. Don't trend left too early. The rock beneath W-G is smaller and pretty loose. The descent is super obvious - much clearer than Moby's. May 22, 2018
Franz Buzawa
Brooklyn, NY
Franz Buzawa   Brooklyn, NY
I second that motion @ Derek Michael, "Some questionable large flakes and blocks that someone might end up riding some day. Pull gently and think light thoughts." Especially on the final pitch (not the right-hand, 5.8 variation). The loose flakes, etc. going through the broken left-facing corner (about mid-pitch) are no joke/not solid. Proceed with caution when leading and instruct your second to be careful, especially less experienced climbers. Jul 21, 2018
Evan Glessner
San Francisco, CA
Evan Glessner   San Francisco, CA
Quality climb and certainly a bold route for its time. Need to be aware of loose rock. Well worth getting to the base early to avoid inexperienced parties. Nov 19, 2018
Nick Woodman
Saco, ME
Nick Woodman   Saco, ME
Another voice for rack size. Went up with a single rack, x4 from .1 to .4, and c4s from .4 to 3, with a second #1 (was nice on the 5.8 right variation before the pipe.) Set of stoppers from 4-11, 8 single length draws and 2 double length. Excellent climb, the last pitch just makes me nervous with less experienced followers. Jan 11, 2019
Robert Hall
North Conway, NH
  5.7 PG13
Robert Hall   North Conway, NH  
  5.7 PG13
Nick....agreed; although I'd worry more about inexperienced leaders; as several COMMENTers have said, someone, someday may ride one of those last-pitch flakes down. The last pitch is also more difficult than it used to be. (now about 5.6-5.7 vs 5.4-5.5) Jan 11, 2019