Mountain Project Logo

Routes in The Red Slab

1976 Crack/chimney T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Back Scratcher T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a PG13
Bumblies For Breakfast S 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Corner, The T 5.8 5b 16 VI- 15 HVS 4c
Diamondback S 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Fun 'n' Games T 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Jenga S 5.6 4c 14 V 12 S 4b
Lounge Lizard S 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
MK '74 T,TR 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a X
Pink Slip S 5.12b 7b 26 VIII+ 26 E5 6b
Rattle and Scream S 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Rubics S 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Slip It In T 5.11b 6c 23 VIII- 23 E3 5c
Slip and Slide S 5.10d 6b+ 21 VII+ 21 E3 5b
Snakes For Snacks S 5.10a 6a 18 VI+ 18 E1 5a
Spring Fever T,S 5.10+ 6b+ 21 VII+ 20 E3 5b
Trundelero S 5.10b 6a+ 19 VII- 19 E2 5b
Vapor Trail S 5.9 5c 17 VI 17 HVS 5a
Wicked Game S 5.10d 6b+ 21 VII+ 21 E3 5b R
Unsorted Routes:
Type: Sport, 85 ft
FA: Alan Nelson and Guy Lords, 1990
Page Views: 2,828 total, 14/month
Shared By: Richard M. Wright on Mar 4, 2001
Admins: Leo Paik, John McNamee, Frances Fierst, Monty, Monomaniac

You & This Route


76 Opinions

Your To-Do List:

Add To-Do

Your Star Rating:


     Clear Rating

Your Difficulty Rating:


-none- Change

Your Ticks:

Add New Tick
    -none-
Seasonal Raptor Closures Details

Description

Vapor Trail begins off the ground as the second route to the right of the ugly looking, trad grunge on the left side of the Red Slab. This is not a beginner's climb. While the climbing never gets harder than 5.9, all of the bolts feel spacey. The climbing is also a bit devious being filled with underclings, side pulls, and continuously sloping feet. Nonetheless, the climbing is great for the grade and worth all of two stars. Vapor Trail shares its anchor with Bumblies for Breakfast (5.10a) and will set up a good top rope for both climbs.

Protection

QDs only. This 85 foot route needs only six draws and something for the double bolt anchor at the top.

Photos

mmk
Golden, CO
mmk   Golden, CO
About 2/3 of the way up there is a large block (approx. 1.5' x 2') that appears attached with an awesome undercling for your left hand. When I pulled on it, it creaked. Be careful! Oct 30, 2017
Matt Pierce
Denver, CO
 
Matt Pierce   Denver, CO
 
It would be nice if MP would eliminate all of the super OLD beta comments about routes. At any rate - did this route today and thought it was surprisingly GREAT - on par with the best 9s in the canyon - including Lunch Money and others. If you are a solid 5.9 leader and looking for solid terrain, this is worth the visit. Nov 13, 2016
Dave Clark 5.10
Golden, CO
  5.9
Dave Clark 5.10   Golden, CO
  5.9
A fun and thoughtful route. Thoughts like, "There's got to be a more useful hold than that one." and "I wouldn't want to fall here." Pretty consistent for the grade. May 23, 2011
JohnM
Arvada, Colorado
JohnM   Arvada, Colorado
Thought this route was great. My first outdoor sport lead, found the bolts to be spacey but not outrageous if you have a good head. I wouldn't recommend this as a beginner route. Apr 21, 2010
nickb
bouderado
 
nickb   bouderado
 
Just climbed this yesterday, way too hot to do right now. A good route, the chain on the right is looking a little worn. Jul 20, 2008
Stephen Marsh
Thornton, CO
Stephen Marsh   Thornton, CO
Just climbed this last weekend, my first time at Red Slab. Thought the route was excellent. Nothing seemed loose on it as someone early stated. From the discussion here it sounds like 1 or 2 bolts have been added. It would definitely be freaky if the current first bolt wasn't there. The bolt spacing was perfect, really added to the excitment. 2 stars seems a low rating for this climb. The climbing stays interesting throughout, but with plenty of rests between the tricky spots. The moves require thought and searching. A definite 9, don't agree with Andy on that. Glad this one wasn't bolted as close as the routes at HWC (left). And to Nate: if bolts are spaced too far for you, you can always skip the route! Sep 25, 2007
[Awesome] route. It is over graded though, it had to be .8 at least. The first is a little bit never racking because the runouts are big and if you fall you could hurt real bad, but if you are climbing .9 well, then you will have no problem with this route. [SUPER] COOL. Aug 4, 2002
OK, so you can tell from my last comment that I hadn't looked at the Bumblies for Breakfast entry. I guess my question about the bolts has been answered. May 16, 2002
I think this is a nice climb and worth doing. Last time I tried it I actually found it even more testy than Bumblies for Breakfast, even though it has (had) one more bolt (I guess it has two more now). I know the first bolt was up there a bit, but I felt like if you were not solid getting to it, you probably shouldn't be on the climb. On the other hand, removing the groundfall potential is probably a good thing, but what about Bumblies? If you botch the second clip the belayer better start running! I can't imagine someone would botch it, but I would also have though falling before the first bolt on Vapor Trail would be rare. So does this mean Bumblies needs an extra bolt (or two)?

Yes, these climbs are potentially dangerous, but they are not devious, nor under rated. Anyone can see from the ground that the bolts are spaced a ways apart which is a good indication not to do the climb unless you are solid at the grade. Will the extra bolt lull someone who hasn't climbed this route into a false sense of security (if they haven't checked out this site)? May 16, 2002
If bolts are placed to closely for your taste, you can always skip them.... Feb 28, 2002
Just to clarify my earlier comments about a more "ethical" bolting style: I was speaking more about the spacing of the bolts rather than the manner in which they're installed. I agree with your points 100%. There are many routes which I feel are greatly "over-bolted," where bolts are placed no more than one body length apart. This can, in my opinion, greatly diminish the asthetic of the climb. Please understand that I am not promoting highly dangerous climbs with lots and lots of space between bolts; I am merely stating that, on this climb in particular, the bolt spacing seems quite adequate and enhances the thrill of the climb. Thanks again, Alan, for putting up this fun one for the rest of us. Feb 28, 2002
I just wanted to give kudos to Alan Nelson for putting up this fantastic route. There is, indeed, some space between the bolts, but the climbing is positive and quite spectacular. It was a pleasure to climb such a great line with, in my opinion, a much more ethical bolting style. Thanks, Alan. Feb 26, 2002
Jeff Lockyer
Canmore, AB
Jeff Lockyer   Canmore, AB
Agree with consensus about the rock quality. There ARE many loose block on the route and should not be used for feet, but there are many feet and other holds to use, so just relax and look around, before you know it another bolt will be upon you. I would give this route 1 star, not as good as others on the wall. Not a good beginner's lead as stated before, just too many chances to take a big fall, be careful. Sep 16, 2001
Joe Keyser
Scottsdale, AZ
Joe Keyser   Scottsdale, AZ
Cool, I thought getting to bolt #1 was the scariest part! Not so much the moves but the rock quality. The wedged in blocks are good but don't seem that way.... Sep 10, 2001
Saw a climber fall and bust/badly sprain both ankles on this route. He couldn't walk, so he/we tyroled across the river. Jan 1, 2001
If you are not comfy on 5.9, don't do this route! The 15 ft runouts will scare the hell out of you. Jan 1, 2001